Evaluating a Primary-Care Group-based Mindfulness Program

April 2, 2021 updated by: Elizabeth Alvarez, McMaster University
The study evaluates the effectiveness of a group-based mindfulness program conducted in a primary care setting. This study also aims to identify any scale-up and implementation considerations for the program.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A primary care group-based mindfulness program was developed by community physicians and co-op and public health students in Ajax, Ontario. The program was started in January 2018 and is run through the Ajax Harwood Clinic, which is a clinic housing a Family Health Organization (FHO) comprising of 5 physicians and approximately 6,500 patients. The purposes of the program are:

  1. To teach mindfulness skills for stress reduction, self-compassion, and dealing with difficult thoughts and emotions,
  2. To promote an integrative concept of health, which treats the whole person
  3. To promote community building and positive relationships
  4. To capitalize on the power of groups to:

    1. Foster peer-to-peer learning and support when it comes to coping with life challenges
    2. Combat isolation
    3. Increase efficiency, quality, and timeliness of care

This study evaluates the 8-week rolling admission mindfulness program, by first doing a retrospective chart review to identify effect sizes and then conducting a before-after study evaluation of the effect of the mindfulness program on key mental health outcome measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ajax, Ontario, Canada, L1S 2H6
        • Ajax Harwood Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be enrolled in mindfulness-based program through Ajax Harwood Clinic
  • Age of 18
  • English-speaking ability to participate in program
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no formal exclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mindfulness Group Program
A primary care mindfulness-based rolling admissions program where subjects must attend 4 of 8 consecutive group sessions, to be considered to have completed the program.

The mindfulness program has the following aims (Iacono, 2018): to teach mindfulness skills for stress reduction, self-compassion, and dealing with difficult thoughts and emotions, to promote an integrative concept of health, which treats the whole person, to promote community building and positive relationships, and to capitalize on the power of groups to:

  1. Foster peer-to-peer learning and support when it comes to coping with life challenges
  2. Combat isolation
  3. Increase efficiency, quality, and timeliness of care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Change from baseline each week until 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline
The GAD-7 is a validated instrument for the diagnosis and treatment response of anxiety disorders (Spitzer et al, 2006; Hinz et al, 2017). It is comprised of 7 questions with 4 answer options, ranging from "not at all" to "nearly every day" and scored 0-3 with a total score ranging from 0-21 (Spitzer et al, 2006). Scores of 5-9, 10-14, and 15-21 represent mild, moderate and severe generalized anxiety disorder, respectively. In the primary care setting, the GAD-7 has high diagnostic validity, with a threshold of 10 exhibiting a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 82% for generalized anxiety disorder (Spitzer et al, 2006). Other conditions related to generalized anxiety disorder including panic disorder, social anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder have also been sensitive to a GAD-7 score of 10 (Kroenke et al, 2007).
Change from baseline each week until 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Heath Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) for depression
Time Frame: Change from baseline each week until 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is made up of nine questions and is diagnostic for depression. Importantly, the PHQ-9 has also been found to be sensitive to change for monitoring of treatment outcomes (Kohrt et al, 2016; Lowe et al, 2004). The PHQ-9 asks participants, "Over the last 2 weeks, how often have you been bothered by any of the following problems?" All answers have four options ranging from "not at all," "several days," more than half the days," or "nearly every day" for a number of symptoms related to depression. Major depression and other depressive syndromes are diagnosed based on answers of "more than half the days" or "nearly every day" to "Little interest or pleasure in doing things" or "Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless" plus 2-5 or more of the other symptoms.
Change from baseline each week until 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline each week until 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline

The Insomnia Severity Index, a 7-item scale, was identified as the most fitting validated scale to identify insomnia symptoms (Bastien et al., 2001). Each of the questions is measured on a scale of 0-4 and the answers are added up to get a total score.

Total score categories:

0-7 = No clinically significant insomnia 8-14 = Subthreshold insomnia 15-21 = Clinical insomnia (moderate severity) 22-28 = Clinical insomnia (severe)

Change from baseline each week until 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline
DeJong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline each week until 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline
The DeJong Gierveld 6-item Loneliness Scale captures both emotional loneliness (missing an intimate relationship) and social loneliness (missing a wider social network) (Gierveld et al, 2006; Grygiel et al, 2016). Each subscale is made up of three questions with possible answers of "yes," "more or less," or "no." Questions 1-3 are negatively worded and answers of "yes" or "more or less" are scored as "1", while "no" is scored as "0". On positively worded questions (4-6), neutral or negative answers ("no" or "more or less") are scored as "1," while "yes" is scored as "0." This gives a range of 0 (not lonely)-3 (very lonely) in each subscale, or 0 (not lonely)-6 (very lonely) in the total scale. However, we have changed this scoring so that we can further discriminate between neutral and other answers. Therefore, our scoring on each question ranges from 0-2, giving a total scale of 0 (not lonely)-12 (very lonely).
Change from baseline each week until 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemoglobin A1C (HgA1C)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline
Assessing prevalence of diabetes via HgA1C levels from electronic medical record (EMR) for comorbidity comparison
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline
Weight
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline
Assessing prevalence of obesity/comorbidities from weight through EMR data
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and at 8 months post-baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elizabeth Alvarez, MD, McMaster University
  • Principal Investigator: Yaswanta Gummadi, BHSc, McMaster University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness Group Program

3
Subscribe