Evolution of Lung 18FDG Uptake in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Receiving Pirfenidone (PET-Fibrosis)

October 3, 2022 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare and fatal lung disease characterized by unpredictable changes with variable kinetics of progression. Changes in pulmonary function (FVC, DLCO) assessed at the time of diagnosis, or decline in pulmonary function within 12 months after diagnosis, are the best predictors of survival, but poorly predicted disease activity and evolution. 18FDG positron emission tomography (18FDG PETscan) provides the ability to quantify cell metabolism in vivo and non-invasively using a labeled non-metabolizable substrate. Several parameters can be measured in an automated and reproducible way, such as the mean fixation intensity (SUV mean), the maximum fixation intensity (SUV max), the hyperfixing volume measurement (MLV) or the glycolytic activity measurement tissue or TLG (total lesions glycolysis). Several studies have demonstrated an increase of glycolytic activity in lung fibroblast from IPF patient. In a recent study, the investigators demonstrated a strong correlation between the lung uptake parameters and the lung function tests results (LFTs) and prognostic score GAP. In addition, MLV and TLG were factors prognostic and independently associated with progression-free survival at 12 months. In a preliminary study, the investigators studied the change of these parameters in twelve patients treated with pirfenidone for IPF who performed an 18FDG PETscan before the initiation of treatment and about twelve weeks later. A mean decrease of 30% in TLG value between the two evaluations was observed. These preliminary data suggest that pirfenidone influences lung metabolism in patients with IPF. The investigators aim to conduct a prospective study to confirm and refine the preliminary data.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare and fatal lung disease characterized by an unpredictable evolution with variable kinetics of progression and burdened by the occurrence of exacerbation. The evaluation of the prognosis in a given patient remains difficult. Impaired lung function assessed by the value of forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion of lung carbon monoxide (DLCO) at the time of diagnosis, or decline in lung function within 6 or 12 months after the diagnosis, are the best predictive markers of survival but fail to assess or to predict lung function decline. Until recently, lung transplantation was the only IPF treatment and remains associated with high morbidity and mortality. Pirfenidone and nintedanib - anti-fibrotic treatments - are now validated therapies in the management of mild-to-moderate IPF defined by FVC ≥ 50% of predictive value and by DLCO ≥ 30 % of predicted value. Several international clinical trials demonstrated that pirfenidone and nintedanib significantly reduce the lung function decline and the exacerbations incidence and significantly improve survival. The emergence of these innovative but costly therapies - which are associated with a non-negligible rate of adverse effects - requires the development of tools to evaluate their effectiveness and monitor anti-fibrotic activity. The 18-fluorodesoxyglucose (18FDG) lung uptake may be the first tool to predict early therapeutic response. PET offers the possibility to quantify in vivo and non-invasively the cell metabolism, using a non-metabolizable substrate labeled as 18FDG. Several parameters can be measured in an automated and reproducible manner such as the mean uptake intensity (SUV mean), the maximum uptake intensity (SUV max), the metabolic lung volume measurement (MLV) or finally the measurement of tissue glycolytic activity or TLG (total lesion glycolysis). 18FDG PET scanner plays a key role in the diagnosis and monitoring of neoplasia and inflammatory diseases such as sarcoidosis. Recent studies reported a change of the metabolic activity of pulmonary fibroblasts issued from IPF, showing increase of glycolytic activity. In a recent study, the investigators demonstrated a strong correlation between the lung uptake parameters and the lung function tests results and prognostic score GAP. In addition, MLV and TLG were prognostic and independently associated with progression-free survival at 12 months. Preliminary data suggest that the intensity of lung 18FDG uptake may be a prognostic marker but also a predictive marker of response to anti-fibrotic treatments. A prospective study must be conducted to confirm or refute these observations.

Primary objective: The main objective of this study is to describe the changes of 18FDG lung uptake assessed by TLG variation in patients with IPF, 12 weeks after the initiation of pirfenidone.

Secondary objectives: Secondary objectives include the following : 1. To describe the changes of 18FDG lung uptake assessed by other 18FDG indices (SUVmean, SUVmax and MLV) in patients with IPF, 12 weeks after the initiation of pirfenidone ; 2. To study the relationship between the variation of 18FDG lung uptake 12 weeks after the initiation of pirfenidone therapy (as assessed by the changes of TLG, SUVmean, SUVmax and MLV) and the decline of FVC 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks after the initiation of pirfenidone therapy ; 3. To estimate the predictive performance of the variation of 18FDG lung uptake 12 weeks after the beginning of pirfenidone therapy for therapeutic efficacy at 24 weeks.

Experimental plan: This is an interventional, prospective, multicenter, proof of concept study. 18FDG PET-scanner will be performed at baseline and 12 weeks after the beginning of pirfenidone treatment in each patient. Lung Function Tests will be also performed before and 12 weeks after initiation of pirfenidone treatment and will be repeated every 12 weeks until 48 weeks after pirfenidone initiation. A clinical examination and liver enzymes will be assessed every 12 weeks. The occurrence of any adverse event will be collected throughout the trial. LFTs will be interpreted blindly from the results of 18FDG uptake.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75018
        • Recruiting
        • Service de Pneumologie A Centre constitutif de référence des maladies pulmonaires rares Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard
        • Contact:
          • Bruno Crestani, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. IPF, diagnosed accordingly to ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT international guidelines
  2. FVC≥50% and DLCO≥30%
  3. Decision to initiate a treatment with pirfenidone
  4. Affiliation to the French social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

Will be non-eligible in this study any patient:

  1. with an age lower than 18 years
  2. with a life expectancy lower than 12 months as assessed by the investigator
  3. taking an anti-fibrotic treatment (pirfenidone, nintedanib or any experimental molecule) in the previous three months
  4. treated by corticosteroid therapy (daily dose > 10 mg, prednisone equivalent)
  5. with neoplasia localized in thorax
  6. with contraindication to pirfenidone according to the French Summary of Product Characteristics : hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients, past history of angioedema with pirfenidone, concomitant treatment with fluvoxamine, severe or terminal hepatic insufficiency, severe renal insufficiency (CrCl <30ml / min) or end-stage requiring dialysis
  7. with a positive pregnancy test or currently breastfeeding
  8. with contraindication to performing a 18FDG PETscan, ie 18FDG hypersensitivity
  9. with emphysema extension >15% on HRCT according to Cottin et al (16).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 18FDG-PET scan
18FDG PET scan will be performed in each patient before initiation of pirfenidone and after 12 weeks of treatment
18FDG PET scan will be performed in each patient before initiation of pirfenidone and after 12 weeks of treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of 18FDG lung uptake (TLG variation) in patients with IPF 12 weeks after the initiation of pirfenidone
Time Frame: 12 weeks
To describe the changes of 18FDG lung uptake assessed by TLG variation in patients with IPF 12 weeks after the initiation of pirfenidone
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of 18FDG lung uptake in patients with IPF 12 weeks after the initiation of pirfenidone : variation of SUVmean between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Values of SUVmean will be compared between baseline (treatment initiation with pirfenidone) and the 12 weeks using a Wilcoxon's signed rank test
12 weeks
Change of 18FDG lung uptake in patients with IPF 12 weeks after the initiation of pirfenidone : variation of SUVmax between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Values of SUVmax will be compared between baseline (treatment initiation with pirfenidone) and the 12 weeks using a Wilcoxon's signed rank test
12 weeks
Change of 18FDG lung uptake in patients with IPF 12 weeks after the initiation of pirfenidone : variation of MLV between baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Values of MLV will be compared between baseline (treatment initiation with pirfenidone) and the 12 weeks using a Wilcoxon's signed rank test
12 weeks
Variation of the PET parameter SUVmean between baseline and 12 weeks and FVC at 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Relationship between the variation of SUVmean values between baseline and 12 weeks after treatment initiation and the decline of FVC over time will be assessed using a linear mixed effect model of the evolution of FVC over time and the effect of the change of each PET parameter on the decline of FVC over time will be tested
48 weeks
Variation of the PET parameter SUVmax between baseline and 12 weeks and FVC at 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Relationship between the variation of SUVmax values between baseline and 12 weeks after treatment initiation and the decline of FVC over time will be assessed using a linear mixed effect model of the evolution of FVC over time and the effect of the change of each PET parameter on the decline of FVC over time will be tested
48 weeks
Variation of the PET parameter TLG between baseline and 12 weeks and FVC at 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Relationship between the variation of TLG values between baseline and 12 weeks after treatment initiation and the decline of FVC over time will be assessed using a linear mixed effect model of the evolution of FVC over time and the effect of the change of each PET parameter on the decline of FVC over time will be tested
48 weeks
Variation of the PET parameter MLV between baseline and 12 weeks and FVC at 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Relationship between the variation of MLV values between baseline and 12 weeks after treatment initiation and the decline of FVC over time will be assessed using a linear mixed effect model of the evolution of FVC over time and the effect of the change of each PET parameter on the decline of FVC over time will be tested
48 weeks
Evaluation of the performance of the PET scanner (Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive predictive value and Negative predictive value) using the variation of each PET parameter and the therapeutic response at 24 weeks (succes versus failure)
Time Frame: 24 weeks

The performance of the PET scanner (Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive predictive value, and Negative predictive value) will be studied using the variation of each PET parameter and the therapeutic response at 24 weeks.

A non-parametric Wilcoxon test will be used to compare the variation of each PET parameter according to the therapeutic response.

The therapeutic response will be classified as therapeutic failure in the case of any of the following events between pirfenidone treatment initiation and 24 weeks: a relative decline in percent predicted FVC ≥10%, an absolute decline in 6MWT distance ≥50 m, or death from any cause, or as therapeutic success (in any other case).

24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bruno Crestani, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 4, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on 18FDG-PET scan

3
Subscribe