Evaluation of Customized V Plate Versus Conventional Miniplates of Mandibular Angle Fracture

July 26, 2019 updated by: Hiba Obad Saleh Saeed, Cairo University

Evaluation of the Effect of Customized V Plate Fixation Versus a Conventional Superior -Inferior Miniplates Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture on Mouth Opening and Radiographical Parameters Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of the study to evaluate the effect of customized V pattern plate fixation versus a conventional superior-inferior mini plates fixation of mandibular angle fracture on mouth opening and radio graphical parameters.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The mandibular angle is one of the most common sites for fractures, accounting for 23-42% of all cases of mandibular fractures. Moreover, mandibular angle fractures have the highest postoperative complications among all mandibular fractures, and the loosening of screws and fracturing of plates are main reasons for the complications.The most widely used treatment modality for mandibular angle fracture is the use of one miniplate fixation ,The other one uses two mini-plates, with a upper mini-plate fixed at the same place of previous treatment which corresponds to the tension band of the mandible, and the lower mini-plate fixed at the inferior border of the mandible which corresponds to the compression band of the mandible, however, based on recent experimental and clinical studies, the stability provided by the miniplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures has become a point of contention among surgeons .In order to decrease the need for plate removal, reduce the operative time and improve the stability of the fixation system, a customized V pattern plate design is an appropriate plate structure for fractured mandible using the minimum output values for stress of plate and displacement of bony segments to seek maximum reduction volume on an original plate .Patient satisfaction include: clinical parameters such are occlusion, pain, facial swelling, maximal mouth opening, sensory function, and surgical wound ,these should be evaluated postoperatively ,radio graphical evaluation is also an important parameter to assess adequate reduction of the fractured segments .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11599
        • faculty of dentistry-Cairo university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with at least a unilateral unfavorable angle fracture indicated for Open reduction internal fixation alone or in combination with fracture elsewhere in the mandible or midrace.
  • Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of bone, and predictable outcome

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic disease (may affect normal healing).
  • Patients with old and/or malunited fractures (affect accuracy of reduction of the fractured segments).
  • Patients whom cannot tolerate follow up intervals (affect accuracy of study results).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Customized V plate fixation
Computed tomography (CT) scan of the Facial bones (Axial cuts, DICOM file, Gantry tilt zero and minimal thickness of 1mm )is taken for the patients and a customized V pattern plate
(CT) scan is taken for the patients and a customized V pattern plate will be designed .Intraoral approach will be done to expose the angle fracture.Fracture site will be exposed and reduced in normal anatomic position guided by the CAD/CAM plate. MMF will be done.Fracture fragments will be fixed using CAD/CAM plate .
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional miniplates fixation
Conventional superior-inferior miniplates fixation of mandibular angle fixation
Intraoral approach will be done to expose the angle fracture.Fracture site will be exposed and reduced in normal anatomic position. MMF will be done.Fracture fragments will be fixed using conventional miniplates fixation of angle fracture.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mouth Opening
Time Frame: Every week for 1 month ,3 months and 6 months postoperative
Mouth Opening is evaluated by measurement of maximal interincisal opening between maxilaary and mandibular central incisiors by the caliper and measuring unit is mm
Every week for 1 month ,3 months and 6 months postoperative
Radiographical parameters
Time Frame: At 3 and 6 months postoperatively
Radiographical parameters (Bone Density) is detected through CT scan to evaluate bone density in Hounsfield unit in the area of plate fixation to determine the effect of the plate stress over the fracture site Measures format will be summarized as mean
At 3 and 6 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occlusion
Time Frame: immediate postoperative day
Occlusion will be evaluated by intraoral examination and write in dental chart whether normal or abnormal occlusion
immediate postoperative day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hiba O Saleh, Phd.student, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mandibular Fractures

Clinical Trials on Customized V plate fixation

3
Subscribe