Supplemented Low Protein Diet and Progression of CKD

August 6, 2021 updated by: Jose Ramon Paniagua Sierra, Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico

Restriction of Proteins in the Diet and Supplementation With Ketoanalogues to Prevent Disease Progression in Patients With Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease

Investigators intend to analyze diets restricted in protein and supplemented with ketoanalogues of essential amino acids, to slow the progress of renal damage and improve nutritional status in diabetic patients over 60 years with stage 4 chronic kidney disease.

Evey 2 months, evaluations were performed of renal function (creatinine clearance, serum cysteine, proteinuria) and nutritional status (subjective global evaluation,dominant had pressure strength, body composition by bioelectric impedance, serum transferrin, serum prealbumin and serum aminogram) for a follow-up period of 2 years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Design. A multicenter, controlled, randomized, open label clinical trial was performed in patients with T2DM in CKD stage 3b-4 (GFR <44 to >15 mL/min/1.73 m2) treated in hospitals of the Mexican Social Security Institute. The follow-up period was at least 1 year from the inclusion of the last patient. The study was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Declarations of Helsinki and Tokyo with the amendments in Venice (1983). The protocol was approved by the National Research and Ethics Committee and by the Research Committees of all participating hospitals and was registered in National Clinical Trials (NCT03818568).

Patients. Inclusion criteria: Adult patients with T2DM (>18 years) of either sex, with stage 3b-4 of CKD. All patients gave their signed informed consent at the time of recruitment. Exclusion criteria: Previous treatment with KA, kidney transplantation, cancer, HIV-AIDS, or seropositive for hepatitis B or C, patients receiving immunosuppressors, with hypercalcemia, intolerance to KA or disorders of amino acid metabolism. Patients who lost social security during the study, changed address or treating physician were also excluded.

Sample size. Sample size calculation was made on the basis of two independent groups with unequal variances, α=0.05, β=0.20, and assuming a difference of 4.0 mL/min/yr between groups in reduction of eGFR, lower in LPD+KA. Calculation was made with sample size software. A minimum of 51 per group was obtained.

Intervention. Diet design. Energy: 35 kcals/kg of ideal body weight in patients with normal BMI; 30 kcals/kg of ideal body weight in overweight patients (BMI>25 kg/m2) and 40 kcals/kg of ideal weight in underweight patients (BMI<25 kg/m2). Lipids accounted for 35% of the total energy intake (2/3 from polyunsaturated fatty acids). Carbohydrate intake was set at 55-60% of the total energy intake, with >70% of complex carbohydrates. The fiber content was 20-25 g per day. The dietary recommendation for sodium chloride was ~5 g daily and potassium 50-60 mEq/day. Phosphate intake was set at 800-1000 mg per day.

Both groups were prescribed with PrI of 0.6 g/kg/day, preferably plant-based. Patients in LPD+KA group received KA (Ketosteril® (Fresenius Kabi, Deutschland GMBH, BadHomburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommendations (1 tablet/5 kg of body weight divided into 3 doses). All other treatments were provided according to institutional guidelines and prescribed by and according to the criteria of the treating physicians.

Randomization. Patients were centrally randomized 1:1 using an electronic system of random numbers generator.

Outcomes. The primary outcome was: the rate of decline in kidney function (Δ eGFR/year). Secondary outcomes included: start of dialysis, impairment of nutritional status, adverse events, hospitalizations, and mortality.

Follow-up. Patients were followed-up with scheduled visits every two months, for clinical and biochemical evaluation. Blood samples were obtained after an overnight fast, serum and plasma were separated and kept in frozen aliquots (-70 °C) until assay. The 24 h urine volumes were recorded and frozen aliquots stored (-70 °C) until assay. In total blood, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and glycated hemoglobin were measured, and in plasma/serum: glucose, urea, creatinine, albumin, total proteins, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, calcium, phosphorus, C-reactive protein. In 24-hour urine: urea and creatinine. Serum Cystatin-C was measured at baseline and months 6, 9 and 12.

Measurements of biochemical parameters were performed on automated equipment using routine techniques. High sensitivity C-reactive protein and Cystatin-C were measured by immunoturbidimetry (Diazyme's Cystatin C Assay. Poway, CA, USA). The protein nitrogen appearance normalized by body weight (nPNA) was calculated with the Maroni formula, GFR was calculated using formulas based on sCr (eCKDCr), and serum Cystatin C (eGFRCysC).

Nutritional evaluations. The patients were evaluated by Nephrology Nutritionists. Nutritional status was monitored by body weight, body mass index, subjective global assessment, body composition analyzed by electrical bioimpedance, and biochemical parameters. As a functional index, the hand grip force was measured with a dynamometer. Treatment adherence was monitored by the 24-hour food intake questionnaire and/or the 3-day food intake diary, nPNA was also used. In the intervention group, adherence to the use of KA was evaluated by counting tablets and packaging at each visit.

Statistical analysis. Data are presented as means and standard deviations or standard errors and as percentages or frequencies according variable characteristics. Differences between groups were analyzed with Chi2 test, or Student´s t test. For calculation of decline of GFR during follow-up, only actual eGFR data were considered, and two-way analyses of variance used. For analysis of the effect of concomitant medication, differences in slopes of regression lines of eGFR over time among users and non-users of specific medication were used. Differences in distribution of adverse events was analyzed with Chi2 and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. All statistical calculations were made with wSPSS v19 package.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

149

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mexico City, Mexico, 06720
        • Unidad de Investigacion Medica en Enfermedades Nefrologicas, Hospital de Especialidades Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI
    • DF
      • Mexico City, DF, Mexico, 06722
        • Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Nefrológicas, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with diabetic nephropathy in stage 4 chronic kidney disease
  • Patients in pre-dialysis
  • Patients with signed informed consent forms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have received Ketosteril previously
  • Patients participating in other intervention studies
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients with background of renal transplant
  • Patients with cancer, HIV, seropositive for hepatitis B or C or receiving immunosuppressors, hypercalcemia
  • Intolerance of Ketosteril ingredients
  • Hereditary disorders in amino acid metabolism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ketoanalogues of essential amino acids
Patients will receive conventional treatment according to the institution's clinical guidelines, with moderate restriction of proteins 0.6 g protein/kg/day, as recommended to slow renal damage progression), plus ketoanalogues in the established dosage (1 tablet/5 kg weight divided into 3 doses per day).
Patients will receive conventional treatment according to the institution's clinical guidelines, with moderate restriction of proteins 0.6 g protein/kg/day, as recommended to slow renal damage progression), plus ketoanalogues in the established dosage (1 tablet/5 kg weight divided into 3 doses per day).
Active Comparator: Control
Patients will receive conventional treatment according to the institution's clinical guidelines, with moderate restriction of proteins 0.6 g protein/kg/day, as recommended to slow renal damage progression).
Patients will receive conventional treatment according to the institution's clinical guidelines, with moderate restriction of proteins 0.6 g protein/kg/day, as recommended to slow renal damage progression), plus ketoanalogues in the established dosage (1 tablet/5 kg weight divided into 3 doses per day).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
glomerular filtration
Time Frame: 2 years
Speed of reduction in glomerular filtration measured by cysteine C clearance and the need for dialysis glomerular filtration <15 mL/min/1.73 m2)
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comorbidities
Time Frame: 2 years
measure of frequency and number of comorbidities
2 years
Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 2 years
measure of number and length of hospitalizations
2 years
Mortality
Time Frame: 2 years
measure of incidence of mortality
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ramon Paniagua, MD, PhD, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-785-038

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease

Clinical Trials on ketoanalogues of essential amino acids

Subscribe