- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03875352
The Influence of Nursing Technique Applied at the Central Venous Catheter Insertion Site Upon the Incidence of Infection
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study was a prospective and randomized clinical trial. The study was performed at two departments of the University Hospital Ostrava.
The design and performance of the study were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Ostrava.
The patients indicated for insertion of central venous catheter (CVC) were informed about the possible nursing techniques applied at the insertion site of the central venous catheter, participation in the study was conditioned with signing a written informed consent. The study evaluated the superiority of a new procedure in providing nursing care for patients with CVC.
Basic patient characteristics were observed and recorded according to the protocol of the study (age, sex, diagnosis), the number of days with CVC inserted, type of dressing, APACHE II score, the presence of neutropenia and the final score of assessment of local signs of inflammation, which was defined as follows:
0 points = No reddening
- point = Reddening below 2 mm in diameter around the incision
- points = Reddening below 5 mm in diameter around the incision
- points = Reddening exceeding 5 mm in diameter around the incision
- points = Purulent secretion, swelling, pain
- points = Catheter sepsis The investigators also recorded the day when the first signs of local infection were observed.
The obtained results were evaluated with standard statistical techniques (Chí-quadrate test, Fisher's exact test).
Upon inserting CVC, the type of draping was recorded (small, middle, large), and the cannulated vein (vena subclavia, left and right, vena jugularis interna, left and right, vena femoralis, left and right). A smear was obtained from around the incision site in all patients after insertion and after extraction; the smears were sent for microbiology cultivation and determination of sensitivity to antibiotic therapy. Changing of the dressings was performed in accordance with standard operating procedures of the University Hospital Ostrava. The CVC was attended under aseptic conditions, using sterile material. Surrounding of CVC was mechanically cleaned and disinfected using 2% chlorhexidine for disinfection of the skin, let to dry, and semipermeable foil was placed at the site, containing chlorhexidine gluconate. The dressing was identified with a date when it was applied. This was left in situ for 3-4 days, and the procedure was repeated.
The patients were randomized into two study groups:
- HMG Group - the patients were treated with 2% chlorhexidine for skin disinfection, HMG and transparent foil
- CHG Group - the patients were treated with 2% chlorhexidine for skin disinfection and dressing with CHG The randomization procedure further divided the patients into two study arms
1. Neutropenia Group (defined as the number of neutrophil granulocytes below 1x109/l 2. No-neutropenia Group (with a normal number of neutrophil granulocytes
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Moravian-Silesian Region
-
Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia, 70852
- University Hospital Ostrava
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age over 18 years
- Patients with CVC
- Hospitalization at ICU
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy to HMG
- Allergy to transparent foil
- CVC insertion shorter than 3 days
- Strong bleeding from CVC insertion site
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Neutropenia patients
Patients with neutropenia were treated using the CHG and HMG technique.
|
The CHG technique includes treatment using dressing with chlorhexidine.
The HMG technique includes treatment using hydrophilic methacrylate gel and transparent foil.
|
Experimental: No neutropenia patients
Patients with no neutropenia were treated using the CHG and HMG technique.
|
The CHG technique includes treatment using dressing with chlorhexidine.
The HMG technique includes treatment using hydrophilic methacrylate gel and transparent foil.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Local signs of inflammation
Time Frame: 3 days at minimum, up to 15 days
|
The local signs of inflammation were observed in both study arms and both interventions, and were assessed according to the scoring system described in detail description.
|
3 days at minimum, up to 15 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kateřina Hašová, Mgr., University Hospital Ostrava
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chambers ST, Sanders J, Patton WN, Ganly P, Birch M, Crump JA, Spearing RL. Reduction of exit-site infections of tunnelled intravascular catheters among neutropenic patients by sustained-release chlorhexidine dressings: results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Hosp Infect. 2005 Sep;61(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.01.023.
- Crawford AG, Fuhr JP Jr, Rao B. Cost-benefit analysis of chlorhexidine gluconate dressing in the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;25(8):668-74. doi: 10.1086/502459.
- Ho KM, Litton E. Use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing to prevent vascular and epidural catheter colonization and infection: a meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Aug;58(2):281-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl234. Epub 2006 Jun 6. Erratum In: J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Apr;65(4):815.
- Lorente L, Henry C, Martin MM, Jimenez A, Mora ML. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters. Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R631-5. doi: 10.1186/cc3824. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
- Mermel LA. What is the predominant source of intravascular catheter infections? Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Jan 15;52(2):211-2. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq108.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KHO-01-CVC
- RVO-FNOs/2016 (Other Grant/Funding Number: University Hospital Ostrava)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgery
-
3MRecruitingAbdominal Surgery | Orthopedic Surgery | Vascular Surgery | Cardiovascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompletedHand Surgery | Wrist Surgery | Forearm Surgery | Elbow SurgeryUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedGynecological Surgery | Plastic Surgery | ENT SurgeryFrance
-
Edwards LifesciencesCompletedAbdominal Surgery | Pelvic Surgery | Non-Cardiac/ Non-Thoracic Surgery | Major Peripheral Vascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Maquet Cardiopulmonary GmbHNAMSARecruitingCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Thoracic Surgery | Vascular SurgerySpain
-
Baylor Research InstituteChiesi USA, Inc.RecruitingSurgery | Cardiac Surgery | Surgery--Complications | Percutaneous Coronary InterventionUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityEdwards LifesciencesCompletedCardiac Surgery | Thoracic Surgery | Heart Surgery | Heart Transplant
-
Surgify Medical OyCompletedSurgery | Spine SurgeryFinland
-
Cairo UniversityBatterjee Medical College; Taif UniversityCompletedSurgery | Bariatric SurgeryEgypt, Saudi Arabia
-
Poudre Valley Health SystemTerminatedSurgery | Surgery--ComplicationsUnited States
Clinical Trials on CHG technique
-
National Taiwan University HospitalMin-Sheng General Hospital; Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital; Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
University Hospital, GrenobleCompletedCatheter-Related InfectionsFrance
-
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart3M; Fondazione C.N.R./Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Pisa, ItalyUnknownInfection | CatheterizationItaly
-
3MCompleted
-
Duke UniversityCompletedCentral Line-associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI)United States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiCompletedEndometritis | Surgical Site Infections | Infection; Cesarean Section | Chlorhexidine Gluconate Cloths | Infectious MorbidityUnited States
-
3MTerminatedSkin Flora Bacterial Reduction Post-product ApplicationUnited States
-
Medline IndustriesCompleted