The Influence of Nursing Technique Applied at the Central Venous Catheter Insertion Site Upon the Incidence of Infection

March 13, 2019 updated by: University Hospital Ostrava
Assessing the impact of the nursing technique applied at the insertion site of the central venous catheter using hydrophilic methacrylate gel (HMG) and 2% Chlorhexidine (CHG) upon the incidence of inflammatory complications when treating the surrounding of the central venous catheter.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study was a prospective and randomized clinical trial. The study was performed at two departments of the University Hospital Ostrava.

The design and performance of the study were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Ostrava.

The patients indicated for insertion of central venous catheter (CVC) were informed about the possible nursing techniques applied at the insertion site of the central venous catheter, participation in the study was conditioned with signing a written informed consent. The study evaluated the superiority of a new procedure in providing nursing care for patients with CVC.

Basic patient characteristics were observed and recorded according to the protocol of the study (age, sex, diagnosis), the number of days with CVC inserted, type of dressing, APACHE II score, the presence of neutropenia and the final score of assessment of local signs of inflammation, which was defined as follows:

0 points = No reddening

  1. point = Reddening below 2 mm in diameter around the incision
  2. points = Reddening below 5 mm in diameter around the incision
  3. points = Reddening exceeding 5 mm in diameter around the incision
  4. points = Purulent secretion, swelling, pain
  5. points = Catheter sepsis The investigators also recorded the day when the first signs of local infection were observed.

The obtained results were evaluated with standard statistical techniques (Chí-quadrate test, Fisher's exact test).

Upon inserting CVC, the type of draping was recorded (small, middle, large), and the cannulated vein (vena subclavia, left and right, vena jugularis interna, left and right, vena femoralis, left and right). A smear was obtained from around the incision site in all patients after insertion and after extraction; the smears were sent for microbiology cultivation and determination of sensitivity to antibiotic therapy. Changing of the dressings was performed in accordance with standard operating procedures of the University Hospital Ostrava. The CVC was attended under aseptic conditions, using sterile material. Surrounding of CVC was mechanically cleaned and disinfected using 2% chlorhexidine for disinfection of the skin, let to dry, and semipermeable foil was placed at the site, containing chlorhexidine gluconate. The dressing was identified with a date when it was applied. This was left in situ for 3-4 days, and the procedure was repeated.

The patients were randomized into two study groups:

  1. HMG Group - the patients were treated with 2% chlorhexidine for skin disinfection, HMG and transparent foil
  2. CHG Group - the patients were treated with 2% chlorhexidine for skin disinfection and dressing with CHG The randomization procedure further divided the patients into two study arms

1. Neutropenia Group (defined as the number of neutrophil granulocytes below 1x109/l 2. No-neutropenia Group (with a normal number of neutrophil granulocytes

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

221

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Moravian-Silesian Region
      • Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia, 70852
        • University Hospital Ostrava

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18 years
  • Patients with CVC
  • Hospitalization at ICU

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to HMG
  • Allergy to transparent foil
  • CVC insertion shorter than 3 days
  • Strong bleeding from CVC insertion site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neutropenia patients
Patients with neutropenia were treated using the CHG and HMG technique.
The CHG technique includes treatment using dressing with chlorhexidine.
The HMG technique includes treatment using hydrophilic methacrylate gel and transparent foil.
Experimental: No neutropenia patients
Patients with no neutropenia were treated using the CHG and HMG technique.
The CHG technique includes treatment using dressing with chlorhexidine.
The HMG technique includes treatment using hydrophilic methacrylate gel and transparent foil.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local signs of inflammation
Time Frame: 3 days at minimum, up to 15 days
The local signs of inflammation were observed in both study arms and both interventions, and were assessed according to the scoring system described in detail description.
3 days at minimum, up to 15 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kateřina Hašová, Mgr., University Hospital Ostrava

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KHO-01-CVC
  • RVO-FNOs/2016 (Other Grant/Funding Number: University Hospital Ostrava)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

The investigators have decided not to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on CHG technique

3
Subscribe