Effect of Combined IMT and CPAP in Pulmonary Rehabilitation for COPD

March 12, 2024 updated by: Zhujiang Hospital

Effect of Combined Inspiratory Muscle Training and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Inspiratory muscle training(IMT) was one of the widely used pulmonary rehabilitation method in COPD patients.However, when the respiratory muscles are fatigue without sufficient rest, IMT may increase muscle fatigue and aggravate muscle damage. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is another important strategy of pulmonary rehabilitation which could overcome airway resistance and reduce respiratory work, improve respiratory muscle fatigue. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the effective of the "IMT - NPPV sequential" rehabilitation method, that is, first inspiratory muscle training, followed by respiratory muscle resting (non-invasive positive pressure ventilation).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Exploring the effects of the new rehabilitation method of "IMT - NPPV sequential", comparing with the single rehabilitation strategy such as inspiratory muscle training and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510282
        • Zhujiang Hospital,Southern Medical Universicity

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pulmonary function test of forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity(FVC) < 70% after inhalation of bronchial dilation agent. Patients in a clinically stable state.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were excluded if they had other respiratory diseases ,or evidence of pneumothorax or mediastinal emphysema and pacemaker installed.

Patients with acute cardiovascular event and severe cor pulmonale. Patients with poor compliance. An Other causes of diaphragmatic dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: respiratory muscle weakness
Patients with respiratory muscle weakness are performing the inspiratory pressure threshold device, combined CPAP and inspiratory pressure threshold device and continue oxygen therapy randomly.
The threshold loading device is composed of a mouth -piece attached to a small plastic cylinder that contains a spring-loaded poppet value. The valve opens to permit inspiratory flow only once the person has generated adequate negative intrathoracic pressure to condense the spring.
Other Names:
  • CPAP
Experimental: normal respiratory muscle
Patients with normal respiratory muscle are performing the inspiratory pressure threshold device, combined CPAP and inspiratory pressure threshold device and continue oxygen therapy randomly.
The threshold loading device is composed of a mouth -piece attached to a small plastic cylinder that contains a spring-loaded poppet value. The valve opens to permit inspiratory flow only once the person has generated adequate negative intrathoracic pressure to condense the spring.
Other Names:
  • CPAP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory muscle strength(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Currently, the maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) and maximal expiratory pressures(PEmax) are measured by a digital manometer (AZ-8205, AZ Instrument, Taichung City, Taiwan)and combined to evaluate respiratory muscle function.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diaphragmatic function
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Diaphragmatic function can be assessed by diaphragm electromyogram (EMGdi) measured by a high-performance data acquisition device (Powerlab 16/35; ADInstruments, Australia), which reflect the physiological activity of the diaphragm and indicate functional status of the central drive.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Symptom Evaluation(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Individuals with chronic respiratory disease often have symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, cough, weakness, sleeplessness, and psychological distress. Instruments for assessment of multiple symptoms include COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and Modified Medical British Research Council Scale(mMRC).
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Pulmonary function(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Pulmonary function is measured using a spirometer(PonyFX 229, Cosmed, Rome, Italy) that is calibrated daily.The FEV1 and percent-of-predicted FEV1, FVC and percent-of-predicted FVC which are presented in one report are used to evaluate Pulmonary Function.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Exercise capacity
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Exercise capacity is evaluated using the 6-min walking distance (6MWD) according to American Thoracic Society guidelines.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chen Xin, Doctor, Zhujiang Hospital,Southern Medical Unversity

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-HXNK-011

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe