Interprofessional Group Intervention to Promote Faculty Wellbeing and Engagement

A randomized trial of an interprofessional intervention to reduce burnout and enhance professional engagement in physicians, certified nurse midwives, and nurse practitioners.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Burnout, Professional
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Discussion Guide

Detailed Description

To test the hypothesis that an intervention involving self-facilitated interprofessional group meetings would result in improvement in wellbeing and to determine whether use of a written curriculum provided increased benefit, the following study is conducted:

Practicing clinical faculty in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Massachusetts General Hospital were recruited to participate in three monthly small groups over dinner. Participants were randomized to a control group, which met without any specified guidelines for discussion content, or to receive an intervention which consisted of a one-page discussion guide addressing themes relevant to challenges in the healthcare environment: reframing challenging patient interactions; embracing uncertainty in work; and coping with errors, near misses, and bad outcomes. Outcomes included burnout, empowerment and engagement in work, stress from uncertainty assessed using validated metrics, and perception of of collegiality and community.

All participants were also offered the option of participating in evaluation of biomarkers. To test the hypothesis that an increased sense of bonding and relational connection, and reduced stress levels would be reflected by changes in hormone levels during the meeting and over the course of the study. Faculty who opted into this portion of the study gave the following samples:

Urine Oxytocin before and after the first and third group meetings Salivary Oxytocin before and after the first and third group meetings Salivary Cortisol before and after the first and third group meetings Hair Cortisol at the beginning of the study and at the end of the study (a roughly three month interval).

An optional focus group was conducted after the three monthly sessions.

All participants signed a consent form prior to participating in the study.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 25
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Massachusetts
    • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
      • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Physican in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Massachusetts General Hospital
• Nurse Practitioner in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Massachusetts General Hospital
• Certified Nurse Midwife in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Massachusetts General Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

• None

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention; Providers were placed in small groups and given the intervention of a discussion guide to facilitate discussion.	Other: Discussion Guide; Written list of prompts to facilitate discussion
No Intervention: Control; Providers were placed in small groups and not given a discussion guide to facilitate discussion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Burnout	Change from baseline in 2 item Maslach Burnout Inventory scores before and after the intervention. Minimum score: 2; Maximum score: 14 Higher score = more burnt out (worse outcome)	Change over the three month study period. Baseline measurement and immediately after final intervention.
Stress from Uncertainty	Change in scores on Physician Response to Uncertainty Scale before and after intervention Minimum score: 6; Maximum score: 90 Higher score = increased stress due to uncertainty (worse outcome)	Change over the three month study period. Baseline measurement and immediately after final intervention.
Work Engagement	Change in scores on Utrecht Work Engagement Scale before and after intervention Minimum score: 0; Maximum score: 54 Higher score = higher engagement at work (better outcome)	Change over the three month study period. Baseline measurement and immediately after final intervention.
Urine oxytocin	Change from baseline in the level of urine oxytocin before and after each intervention. This is an exploratory study so the maximum and minimum values are not known, and any change up or down is interesting.	Two samples were taken one hour apart at baseline, and this was repeated three months later.
Salivary Oxytocin	Change from baseline in the level of salivary oxytocin before and after each intervention. This is an exploratory study so the maximum and minimum values are not known, and any change up or down is interesting.	Two samples were taken one hour apart at baseline, and this was repeated three months later
Salivary Cortisol	Change from baseline in the level of salivary cortisol before and after each intervention. This is an exploratory study so the maximum and minimum values are not known, and any change up or down is interesting.	Two samples were taken one hour apart at baseline, and this was repeated three months later
Hair Cortisol	Change from baseline in hair cortisol levels. Maximum and minimum levels are not known and any change up or down is interesting.	Change over the three month study period. Baseline measurement and immediately after final intervention.
Work Empowerment Scale	Minimum score: 12; Maximum score: 84 Change from baseline on Work Empowerment Scale before and after intervention. Higher score = higher empowerment at work (better outcome)	Change over the three month study period. Baseline measurement and immediately after final intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): May 1, 2018
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 30, 2018
• Study Completion (Actual): September 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 3, 2020
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 10, 2020
• First Posted (Actual): March 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 12, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 10, 2020
• Last Verified: March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Behavioral Symptoms; Stress, Psychological; Occupational Stress; Occupational Diseases; Burnout, Psychological; Burnout, Professional
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2018P000415

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No