The Stealth Pet Obedience Training Study (SPOT)

March 30, 2020 updated by: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Strengthening the Bond Between Owners and Their Dogs to Increase Physical Activity

Americans love pets. Nearly 1 in 2 American households (44%) own at least one pet dog and more than 1 in 3 (35%) own a cat. The bond people form with their pets can be powerful and can provide many mental and physical health benefits. In the case of pet dogs, a strong dog-owner bond increases the odds of regular dog walking, which can help owners meet physical activity guidelines. When the bond is strong, owners feel a sense of responsibility to walk the dog, as well as motivation and social support to walk. Dog walking may be a particularly sustainable form of physical activity as dogs require regular exercise throughout their lives, across all seasons. Owners less bonded to their dogs are less likely to walk them regularly and 40% of owners report never walking their dog.

Obedience training may strengthen the dog-owner bond. Thus, the proposed study will test the hypotheses that obedience training can 1) strengthen the dog-owner bond, and 2) promote physical activity among owners. Forty dog owners who do not regularly walk their dog will be randomized to a 6-week obedience training course (n=20) or a control group that does not receive dog training (n=20). The investigators will assess the strength of the dog-owner bond (via questionnaires) and physical activity levels (via a wearable activity monitor) before training, immediately after completing training, and 6 weeks after completing training. The hypothesis is that the dog-owner bond will strengthen and physical activity levels will increase in the intervention group as compared to the control group. As over 50 million American households own a dog, support for this hypothesis would support further investigation of dog obedience training as a novel strategy for promoting public health.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Amherst, Massachusetts, United States, 01003
        • University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 21+ years
  • Current dog owner
  • Walk dog ≤3 for no more than 20 minutes
  • Have not attended obedience training course
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a dog with a history of aggressive behavior
  • Have a dog overdue for rabies vaccination (self-reported)
  • Self-report regular exercise over last 6 months
  • Have any condition that limits walking ability
  • Have uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Waitlist control
Experimental: Intervention
6-week basic dog obedience training course
The class focused on teaching owners how to better communicate with their dog and covered basic commands (e.g., sit, down, watch), loose leash walking, and polite greetings, among other skills. The importance of dog walking was implied, but not specifically emphasized. Classes were held once per week for 45 minutes, with 5-8 students per class.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in physical activity from baseline to 6 weeks
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 6 weeks
Measured with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers
7 days at baseline, 6 weeks
Change in physical activity from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 12 weeks
Measured with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers
7 days at baseline, 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in sedentary behavior from baseline to 6 weeks
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 6 weeks
Measured with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers
7 days at baseline, 6 weeks
Change in sedentary behavior from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 12 weeks
Measured with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers
7 days at baseline, 12 weeks
Change in dog-owner bond strength from baseline to 6 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
The Perceived Emotional Closeness sub-scale of the Cat/Dog Owner Relationship Scale (C/DORS) was used to assess dog-owner bond strength. The sub-scale score can range from 1-5, with a higher score indicating greater emotional closeness.
baseline, 6 weeks
Change in dog-owner bond strength from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
The Perceived Emotional Closeness sub-scale of the Cat/Dog Owner Relationship Scale (C/DORS) was used to assess dog-owner bond strength. The sub-scale score can range from 1-5, with a higher score indicating greater emotional closeness.
baseline, 12 weeks
Change in dog walking self-efficacy from baseline to 6 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
Sub-scales from the Dogs and Walking Survey (DAWGS) were used to assess social cognitive theory-based determinants of dog walking behavior. The self-efficacy sub-scale is scored on a scale of 9-45, with higher scores indicating greater dog walking self-efficacy.
baseline, 6 weeks
Change in dog walking self-efficacy from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Sub-scales from the Dogs and Walking Survey (DAWGS) were used to assess social cognitive theory-based determinants of dog walking behavior. The self-efficacy sub-scale is scored on a scale of 9-45, with higher scores indicating greater dog walking self-efficacy.
baseline, 12 weeks
Change in social support for dog walking from baseline to 6 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
Sub-scales from the Dogs and Walking Survey (DAWGS) were used to assess social cognitive theory-based determinants of dog walking behavior. The social support for dog walking sub-scale is scored on a scale of 3-15, with higher scores indicating greater perceived support from one's dog for walking.
baseline, 6 weeks
Change in social support for dog walking from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Sub-scales from the Dogs and Walking Survey (DAWGS) were used to assess social cognitive theory-based determinants of dog walking behavior. The social support for dog walking sub-scale is scored on a scale of 3-15, with higher scores indicating greater perceived support from one's dog for walking.
baseline, 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Grant #16-00293

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on 6-week basic dog obedience training course

Subscribe