- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04329741
The Stealth Pet Obedience Training Study (SPOT)
Strengthening the Bond Between Owners and Their Dogs to Increase Physical Activity
Americans love pets. Nearly 1 in 2 American households (44%) own at least one pet dog and more than 1 in 3 (35%) own a cat. The bond people form with their pets can be powerful and can provide many mental and physical health benefits. In the case of pet dogs, a strong dog-owner bond increases the odds of regular dog walking, which can help owners meet physical activity guidelines. When the bond is strong, owners feel a sense of responsibility to walk the dog, as well as motivation and social support to walk. Dog walking may be a particularly sustainable form of physical activity as dogs require regular exercise throughout their lives, across all seasons. Owners less bonded to their dogs are less likely to walk them regularly and 40% of owners report never walking their dog.
Obedience training may strengthen the dog-owner bond. Thus, the proposed study will test the hypotheses that obedience training can 1) strengthen the dog-owner bond, and 2) promote physical activity among owners. Forty dog owners who do not regularly walk their dog will be randomized to a 6-week obedience training course (n=20) or a control group that does not receive dog training (n=20). The investigators will assess the strength of the dog-owner bond (via questionnaires) and physical activity levels (via a wearable activity monitor) before training, immediately after completing training, and 6 weeks after completing training. The hypothesis is that the dog-owner bond will strengthen and physical activity levels will increase in the intervention group as compared to the control group. As over 50 million American households own a dog, support for this hypothesis would support further investigation of dog obedience training as a novel strategy for promoting public health.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Amherst, Massachusetts, United States, 01003
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 21+ years
- Current dog owner
- Walk dog ≤3 for no more than 20 minutes
- Have not attended obedience training course
- English speaking
Exclusion Criteria:
- Have a dog with a history of aggressive behavior
- Have a dog overdue for rabies vaccination (self-reported)
- Self-report regular exercise over last 6 months
- Have any condition that limits walking ability
- Have uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
Waitlist control
|
|
|
Experimental: Intervention
6-week basic dog obedience training course
|
The class focused on teaching owners how to better communicate with their dog and covered basic commands (e.g., sit, down, watch), loose leash walking, and polite greetings, among other skills.
The importance of dog walking was implied, but not specifically emphasized.
Classes were held once per week for 45 minutes, with 5-8 students per class.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in physical activity from baseline to 6 weeks
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 6 weeks
|
Measured with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers
|
7 days at baseline, 6 weeks
|
|
Change in physical activity from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 12 weeks
|
Measured with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers
|
7 days at baseline, 12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in sedentary behavior from baseline to 6 weeks
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 6 weeks
|
Measured with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers
|
7 days at baseline, 6 weeks
|
|
Change in sedentary behavior from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: 7 days at baseline, 12 weeks
|
Measured with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers
|
7 days at baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in dog-owner bond strength from baseline to 6 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
|
The Perceived Emotional Closeness sub-scale of the Cat/Dog Owner Relationship Scale (C/DORS) was used to assess dog-owner bond strength.
The sub-scale score can range from 1-5, with a higher score indicating greater emotional closeness.
|
baseline, 6 weeks
|
|
Change in dog-owner bond strength from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
|
The Perceived Emotional Closeness sub-scale of the Cat/Dog Owner Relationship Scale (C/DORS) was used to assess dog-owner bond strength.
The sub-scale score can range from 1-5, with a higher score indicating greater emotional closeness.
|
baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in dog walking self-efficacy from baseline to 6 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
|
Sub-scales from the Dogs and Walking Survey (DAWGS) were used to assess social cognitive theory-based determinants of dog walking behavior.
The self-efficacy sub-scale is scored on a scale of 9-45, with higher scores indicating greater dog walking self-efficacy.
|
baseline, 6 weeks
|
|
Change in dog walking self-efficacy from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
|
Sub-scales from the Dogs and Walking Survey (DAWGS) were used to assess social cognitive theory-based determinants of dog walking behavior.
The self-efficacy sub-scale is scored on a scale of 9-45, with higher scores indicating greater dog walking self-efficacy.
|
baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in social support for dog walking from baseline to 6 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 6 weeks
|
Sub-scales from the Dogs and Walking Survey (DAWGS) were used to assess social cognitive theory-based determinants of dog walking behavior.
The social support for dog walking sub-scale is scored on a scale of 3-15, with higher scores indicating greater perceived support from one's dog for walking.
|
baseline, 6 weeks
|
|
Change in social support for dog walking from baseline to 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks
|
Sub-scales from the Dogs and Walking Survey (DAWGS) were used to assess social cognitive theory-based determinants of dog walking behavior.
The social support for dog walking sub-scale is scored on a scale of 3-15, with higher scores indicating greater perceived support from one's dog for walking.
|
baseline, 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Grant #16-00293
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Physical Activity
-
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityEge UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | Physical Activity Behavior | Physical Activity LevelsTurkey
-
Istinye UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | Youth | Physical Activity Barriers | Physical Activity FacilitatorsTurkey
-
Universidad Pedagogica Nacional, ColombiaEnrolling by invitationPhysical Activity | Running | Running Performance | Running Endurance | Physical Activity in Adults | Physical Activity IntensityColombia
-
Istanbul Kültür UniversityWithdrawnPhysical Activity Level | Physical Activity Awareness
-
University of ManitobaResearch ManitobaCompletedPhysical Activity | Physical Activity Self-Definition
-
Odense University HospitalUniversity of Southern DenmarkRecruitingQuality of Life | Physical Activity | Physical Disability | Physical Function | ParticipationDenmark
-
Universidade do PortoActive, not recruitingPhysical Activity | Physical Fitness | Well BeingPortugal
-
Firat UniversityNot yet recruitingUniversity Students | Physical Activity Level | Postural Awareness | Physical Activity AttitudeTurkey
-
Pham Ngoc Thach University of MedicineCompletedModerate Physical Activity (MPA) | Vigorous Physical Activity (VPA) | Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) | Total of Sleep Time (TST)Vietnam
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTerminatedPhysical Activity | Physical DisabilityFrance
Clinical Trials on 6-week basic dog obedience training course
-
Chimei Medical CenterCompletedResilience | Mindfulness | Nurses in COVID-19 | Pandemic FatigueTaiwan
-
Duke UniversityCompleted
-
St Mary's University CollegeNot yet recruiting
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesTerminatedSedentary Lifestyle | PreDiabetesUnited States
-
University of CalgaryDysautonomia InternationalRecruiting
-
PharmanexUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedBody Weight Changes | Performance Enhancing Product Use | Damage MuscleUnited States
-
University of MichiganNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Completed
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingOsteoporosis | Post MenopausalEgypt