Vaparshun Improving Toilet Use in Rural India

August 25, 2020 updated by: Deepak Saxena, Public Health Foundation of India

Vaparshun Improving Toilet Use in Rural India (The 5 Star Toilet Campaign)

Vaparshun intervention aimed to inspire the target audience to use a toilet. It aimed to revalue their toilets by recognizing that they provide benefits associated with the motives of hoard, create, convenience (comfort) and affiliation, and provide a reward pathway for transitioning to a new toilet use routine.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Our intervention consists of four different streams of activity. The outcome is that family members and men improve and use their contractor-built toilets. The activities are listed below.

  1. Create Motive:

    Toilet Makeover: Conduct a lottery and perform makeovers of select government built toilets in the village, with the involvement of the community. Demonstrate improvements in comfort (light, space, ventilation, latrine chair/handle) and aesthetics (stencil painting of door and walls).

    Challenge/Opportunity: Many of the 'contractor' toilets are built with low engagement from family members and are uncomfortable to use. People are left with toilets they are not proud of or engaged with.

    Insight (from 'makeover' trial): If families invest in creating an attractive toilet they are be more likely adopt and use them.

    Inputs: Materials for the physical and aesthetic improvement of a toilet, manuals for conducting the community event.

    Outputs: Greater engagement with, and pride in, the toilet after makeover; others in the village inspired to conduct their own makeover. Those who use the upgraded toilet find it a more comfortable experience than they had expected causing reinforcement learning.

  2. Hoard motive:

    Pit Emptying Demo and Pit Filling Estimation Demo" A community event-based discussion of the 'real' aspects related to pit filling/emptying designed to graphically overcome their perceptual barriers (e.g., squeezing a watermelon to show how little material there is in faeces).

    Challenge/Opportunity: People over-estimate the speed at which a pit fills and are uncertain about the emptying process. Therefore they hoard the 'limited' pit space by using the toilet only partially.

    Insight from FR: There are gaps between perception and reality which can be addressed. For example; water doesn't stay in the pit but seeps into the soil, faeces are composed mainly of water, decomposition reduces volume, compost doesn't smell and twin pits can be used interchangeably forever.

    Inputs: Films and 'emo-demos' (emotional demonstrations). Outputs: Participants are less anxious about pit filling and emptying.

  3. Affiliation/convenience motives:

    Community Motivational Events: Small and large community events such as street plays, films, posters and pledging activities to bring alive convenience/comfort motives by amplifying problems associated with OD and rewards of using toilets; use of affiliation through testimonials films, posters, village maps, etc.

    Challenge/Opportunity: Even if the barriers around pits and toilet comfort are addressed, it may still not be enough to motivate men with entrenched habits of OD to start using toilets.

    Insights: Convenience/comfort can be a powerful drive for toilet usage. Those who use toilets in the village (women, children and elderly) find it is much more convenient and therefore do not return to OD. However, men who are non-users may not have experienced this and need to be convinced. Affiliation can be another strong drive for toilet usage. It is possible to exploit the emerging norms of toilet use and encourage men 'not to be left behind'.

    Inputs: Scripts, props, invitations, loud hailers, audio-visual equipment, etc. Outputs: Men use toilets because they 'get' how convenient they are, and so as not to be 'left behind'.

  4. Transition to a new toilet use This would include testimonial videos of toilet users and toilet board of household members who improved their toilets. Providing certificate to households who improved their toilets.

Challenge/Opportunity: Those who use toilets for a specific period tend to stick with the habit; however, some people, especially men, do not try out the toilet or find the first experience unpleasant.

Insight: Reward the use of toilets for a specific period so new habits can form.

Inputs: Stimuli and nudges. Outputs: The entire family, especially men, form the habit of using a toilet.

In addition, village authorities will also be recruited to support delivery of the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2483

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gujarat
      • Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India, 382042
        • Indian Institute of Public Health/ Public Health Foundation of India

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Households with a functional government or contractor built toilet.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Households with self built toilet.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vaparshun
In intervention clusters, two full day events, with a gap of 4 weeks between the two events, were organized at cluster level. Eligible households with a government or contract tor built toilet were invited to enroll for a toilet makeover. Intervention activities, delivered at cluster level, included films on toilet improvement, comfort and convenience of toile use, addressing pit filling anxiety and celebrating proud toilet owners by providing certificates and acknowledging them during the events.
Participants in the intervention clusters were encouraged to improve their existing toilets.
Other Names:
  • 5 Star Toilet Campaign
No Intervention: Control Arm
No intervention was delivered to clusters in the control arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of households where all members above the age of 5 years were reported to use the toilet the last time they defecated.
Time Frame: A gap of 6 weeks was maintained between campaign roll out and endline data collection
The survey was addressed to one adult respondent per household, preferably the male or female household head
A gap of 6 weeks was maintained between campaign roll out and endline data collection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exposure to the intervention
Time Frame: Six weeks post intervention delivery
Proportion of population in intervention arm that reports attending intervention events
Six weeks post intervention delivery
Perceptions related to toilet use
Time Frame: Six weeks post intervention delivery
Agreement with statements reflecting important campaign messages such as "Toilets are not just for women; men should use them too", "A smart person is one who uses a toilet", or (phrased negatively) "Toilet pits fill quickly if too many people in the household use them"
Six weeks post intervention delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deepak o Saxena, PhD, IIPHG

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PHFindia

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All collected IPD.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Now.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Unlimited.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Study Data/Documents

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Behavior

Subscribe