Linking Persons With HIV, Discharged From Jail, With Community Care

May 20, 2022 updated by: Anne C Spaulding, Emory University

Linking Persons With HIV, Discharged From Jail, With Community Care: a Direct Comparison of the Costs and Effects of Three HIV Management Strategies in the District of Columbia Department of Corrections

This is a prospective cohort study of outcomes of individuals who entered jail during a period during which one of three serial HIV testing strategies is implemented. This study involves two sub-studies. One sub-study will examine referrals to HIV prevention programs for persons testing negative for HIV while in jail. The second sub-study will monitor antiviral use among those testing positive for HIV.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Incarcerated Americans on any given day represent one in 40 (2.5%) Persons Living with HIV (PLWH) in this country, but those ever incarcerated over the course of a year represent 17% of the US epidemic. PLWH are a diverse group in terms of awareness and management of their disease. A portion may be aware of their HIV status and on treatment. This subgroup is at risk of disruption in care if incarcerated. Others may be aware of their status, but untreated, while still others may be unaware of their HIV status. The latter group is of particular importance in terms of the HIV epidemic in criminal justice settings, as a recent meta-analysis indicated that up to 15% of individuals entering jail have undiagnosed infections.

Good management of PLWH during a period of incarceration is critical. Ensuring that care relationships are maintained or newly established will improve health outcomes among PLWH and reduce the risk of transmission once they are discharged. As the median length of stay in jail is short (median < 7 days), rapid HIV testing is critical. Maximizing the yield and speed of HIV testing in a jail environment has the potential to promote rapid entry into care, or rapid re-engagement if persons have fallen out of care. For those testing negative, it can hasten the referral to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) services.

How correctional facilities offer HIV testing and begin treatment affects long-term outcomes. Because of the rapid churn of jail, point-of-care (POC) rapid testing may lead to a higher percentage of patients receiving test results before leaving jail, compared to conventional assays. Fourth generation laboratory-based antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) testing can diagnosis more persons with acute HIV infection, who may be in the window period before the POC test turns positive, but has a several hour test turn-around time, and those tested may leave jail before receiving their result. Using both tests for every entrant would permit the jail to experience the benefit of both methods but at greater expense. Collaborating with Washington, DC's city jail, known as DC Department of Corrections (DC DOC), and Unity Healthcare, the network of Federally Qualified Health Centers in Washington DC, which also provides care within the DC DOC, this study has a unique opportunity to measure rapidity of testing, linkage to and commencement of care, and achievement of viral suppression, along with costs of HIV identification.

This study uses a unique, time-sensitive opportunity to compare three separate strategies of universal HIV screening and treating. The strategies of POC testing, 4th generation laboratory-based Ag/Ab testing, and a combination of the two tests will be compared in the DC jail. A rigorous assessment of the three strategies in terms of their feasibility, process measures, and cost-effectiveness on an institutional level will help to guide implementation decisions in jails across the US.

One sub-study will assess the number of persons testing negative who are referred to prevention programs after leaving the jail. A second sub-study will examine antiviral use after jail release, among PLWH.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20009
        • DC Department of Corrections

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be enrolled from the study population of NCT04296331, comprised of individuals admitted to D.C. Central Detention Facility (DC DOC) between October 2019 and April 2021.

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Those Testing Negative for HIV:

  • Able to understand and speak English
  • Confirmed HIV negative status
  • Planning to stay in the metropolitan DC area upon jail release
  • Candidate for PrEP using attached screening instrument and interested in taking it

Inclusion Criteria for Those Testing Positive for HIV:

  • Able to understand and speak English
  • Confirmed HIV positive status
  • Planning to stay in the metropolitan DC area upon jail release

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
POC Testing Alone
POC HIV testing (the current standard of care) will be conducted for persons entering jail during the first two-month period.
Point-of-care (POC) rapid HIV testing provides results within minutes, however, it cannot reliably detect new infections. It can take up to 90 days after exposure for HIV infections to be diagnosed with POC rapid testing.
POC and 4th Generation Testing
POC plus 4th Generation HIV Testing will be conducted for persons entering jail during the second two-month period.
Point-of-care (POC) rapid HIV testing provides results within minutes, however, it cannot reliably detect new infections. It can take up to 90 days after exposure for HIV infections to be diagnosed with POC rapid testing.
Fourth generation laboratory-based antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) HIV testing can detect acute HIV infections (as early as 18 days after exposure), but it takes several hours to process.
4th Generation Testing Alone
4th Generation HIV Testing will be conducted for persons entering jail during the third two-month period.
Fourth generation laboratory-based antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) HIV testing can detect acute HIV infections (as early as 18 days after exposure), but it takes several hours to process.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Entrants Tested
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours
The number of entrants receiving an HIV test within 24 hours of intake will be examined.
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of PLWH Identified in First 24 Hours
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours
The percentage of PLWH identified within the first 24 hours of admission, among all PLWH who enter, will be examined.
Up to 24 hours
Number of New HIV Diagnosed Prior to Discharge
Time Frame: Up to Jail Discharge
The number of persons with a new diagnosis of HIV who receive test results before discharge will be examined.
Up to Jail Discharge
Number of Entrants with Acute HIV Infection Identified
Time Frame: Up to 5 days
The number of entrants identified having an acute HIV infection will be examined.
Up to 5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time Until Receipt of Positive Test Result
Time Frame: Up to 5 days
The time (in hours) from the positive test result in persons not previously diagnosed and receipt of test report.
Up to 5 days
Time Until Receipt of Antiviral Dose
Time Frame: Up to Jail Discharge
The time (in days) from entry until receipt of first dose of antiviral in the jail, for PLWH.
Up to Jail Discharge
Time Until Viral Suppression
Time Frame: 6 months after positive HIV intake test
For all PLWH, the time (in days) from entry to achieving viral suppression, if not suppressed at baseline.
6 months after positive HIV intake test
Time Until Meeting with Discharge Planner
Time Frame: Up to Jail Discharge
For all PLWH, the time (in days) from intake to meeting the discharge planner.
Up to Jail Discharge
Number of Participants Taking PrEP
Time Frame: 2 months after jail release, 6 months after jail release
For those consenting to the first sub-study, the number of high-risk persons who test negative for HIV who successfully link to PrEP within 2 months of jail release and stay on PrEP for at least 6 months will be examined.
2 months after jail release, 6 months after jail release
Number of PLWH who Attend Clinic Visits
Time Frame: 1 year
For persons living with HIV who consent to the second sub-study, the percentage of persons previously and newly diagnosed who make clinic visits at least once every 6 months will be examined.
1 year
Number of PLWH with Viral Suppression
Time Frame: 6 months
For persons living with HIV who consent to the second sub-study, the percentage of persons previously and newly diagnosed who are virally suppressed 6 months after sub-study enrollment.
6 months
Cost of Each Testing Strategy
Time Frame: 6 months
A cost-effectiveness analysis using the intermediate process measures will be conducted. Units of resource items, such as tests and staff time, will be multiplied by their unit costs to calculate total costs. Wage ranges provided by DOC and Unity Healthcare will be used to price staff time; market values will be used for all other items. Costs will then be summed by testing strategy.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne Spaulding, MD, MPH, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 3, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 24, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified laboratory results, demographics, and survey questions may be made available to other researchers.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Individual participant data will available for sharing after publication of the main article from this study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Individual participant data will be available for sharing with fellow researchers who submit a proposal for secondary data analysis. Proposals should be sent to aspauld@emory.edu.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Clinical Trials on Point-of-Care (POC) Rapid HIV Test

Subscribe