- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04787133
Supervised Nurse Assisted Preoperative Assessment (SNAP) (SNAP)
Assessment of the Perioperative Experience of Patients According to Different Preoperative Anesthesia Consultation (PAC) Modalities
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Preoperative anesthesia consultations (PACs) are a key moment in the perioperative care journey. During the PAC, the doctor assesses the patient's state of health (allowing an assessment of the perioperative risk), establishes the anesthesia protocol and writes the preoperative prescriptions. PAC also helps inform and educate patients to reduce their anxiety.
Indeed, if the perioperative care pathway and the risks associated with anesthesia are poorly understood, there is an increased risk of preoperative anxiety, poor compliance with preoperative prescriptions, and therefore potential cancellation of the surgical intervention.
In many countries, preoperative PACs are performed by nurses trained and supervised by anesthetists. These PACs take longer than a consultation carried out by a doctor alone, but would on the one hand have a positive effect on patient education and, on the other hand, ultimately reduce the time and costs associated with the PAC . On the other hand, the impact of PACs performed by nurses supervised by physicians on the perioperative experience of patients and on the rate of cancellations of scheduled interventions has not yet been demonstrated.
Since 2013, so-called "optimized" consultations (PAC carried out by a state-certified nurse - IDE - supervised by an anesthesiologist) have been carried out at the Adolphe de Rothschild Foundation (Paris), for patients having a scheduled surgery intervention. cataract under locoregional or general anesthesia. First, the IDE collects the patient's history and treatments and informs him of the perioperative care pathway. In a second step, the doctor performs the pre-anesthetic medical examination, completes the medical examination and writes the appropriate pre and postoperative prescriptions. This method of consultation made it possible to optimize medical time while providing complete, even better, information to the patient.
That is why optimized PACs may improve the patient's perioperative experience and reduce preoperative cancellations regardless of the type of surgery. programmed.
Study Type
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ile-de-France
-
Paris, Ile-de-France, France, 75019
- Hopital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient over 18 years old
- Must benefit from an anesthesia consultation for general or regional anesthesia for scheduled surgery, whatever it is.
- Express consent to participate in the study
- Affiliate or beneficiary of a social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient benefiting from a legal protection measure
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Patient unable to understand and read French, as well as to complete a self-administered questionnaire
- Patient with mental retardation with impaired judgment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of patient satisfaction with a perioperative anesthetic evaluation
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Patient satisfaction will be assess within 48h after surgery using the "Evaluation du Vécu de l'Anesthésie" or "EVAN" (EVAN-G for EVAN-General anesthesia or EVAN-LR for EVAN-locoregional anesthesia). The EVAN-G includes 26 items; six specific scores (Attention, Information, Discomfort, Privacy, Waiting and Pain) and one global index score. The EVAN-LR comprises 19 items; five specific scores (Attention, Information, Discomfort, Waiting, and Pain) and one global index score. Specific and global index scores were linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 100 indicating the best possible level of satisfaction and 0 indicating the worst. |
48 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- JDS_2020_29
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Satisfaction, Patient
-
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research...CompletedSatisfaction, Patient | SatisfactionPakistan
-
Duke UniversityCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Clinician SatisfactionUnited States
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselWithdrawnPatient Satisfaction | Patient PreferenceBelgium
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterTerminated
-
HaEmek Medical Center, IsraelUnknownPatient Satisfaction | Patient Compliance
-
Methodist Health SystemCompletedSatisfaction, PatientUnited States
-
Acibadem UniversityCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Patient Relations, NurseTurkey
-
University Hospital, ToulouseCompletedSatisfaction, PatientFrance
-
University of AarhusAarhus University HospitalCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Patient-Centered CareDenmark
-
Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training...CompletedPatient Satisfaction | Bowel Preparation | Patient ExperienceTurkey