Focus Group Interview Study on Patient Experiences and Satisfaction (RT_Focus)

May 24, 2024 updated by: Mark De Ridder, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Quality Improvement Actions on the Radiotherapy Ward: Focus Group Interview Study on Patient Experiences and Satisfaction

In order to improve quality of care at the department, the investigators will perform a focus group interview study with patients and family members. They will perform 6 (3 in the French, and 3 in the Dutch language) focus group interviews with patients and 6 (3 in the French, and 3 in the Dutch language) with family members.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In order to improve quality of care at the department, the investigators will perform a focus group interview study with patients and family members. They will perform 6 (3 in the French, and 3 in the Dutch language) focus group interviews with patients and 6 (3 in the French, and 3 in the Dutch language) with family members. Following research questions will be answered:

  • What elements of care (ie infrastructure, interpersonal contact, information, communication) are good to the opinion of patients and family members?
  • What elements of care can be improved?
  • What are priorities in improvement of the care for patients and families?
  • What actions could possibly be taken in order to improve the care for future patients?

Because the radiotherapy ward exists of 3 clusters, one per type of treatment conducted, the investigators will perform 6 focus group interviews with patients (3 in the French, and 3 in the Dutch language) and 6 focus group interviews with family members (3 in the French, and 3 in the Dutch language).

Investigators will collect sex, main diagnosis (of patients), age and nationality of all participants at the beginning of each focus group interview. They will transcribe all interviews verbatim and analyze them in Nvivo software as provided by the VUB. Participant characteristics will be analyzed by descriptive statistics.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussel, Belgium, 1090
        • UZ Brussel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria for patients:

  • Patients (18+) who were treated for cancer, receiving radiotherapy, and followed thereafter in the UZ Brussel
  • Dutch and French speaking
  • Start date of treatment max 6 months before inclusion
  • Estimated sample size: 5-8 x 6 patients

Inclusion criteria for family members:

  • All family members (+18) of patients who were treated for cancer, receiving radiotherapy, and followed thereafter in the UZ Brussel
  • Dutch and French speaking
  • Start date of treatment of patient max 6 months before inclusion
  • Estimated sample size: 5-8 x 6 family members

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient focus group
Patients who received radiation treatment
Group interview with patients who received radiation treatment
Experimental: Family focus group
Family of patients who received radiation treatment
Group interview with patients who received radiation treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of care
Time Frame: immediately after treatment
To identify elements of care that need improvement by using open ended interview questions and interaction between different participants
immediately after treatment
Problem solving
Time Frame: immediately after treatment
To identify solutions for problems in care by using open ended interview questions and interaction between different participants
immediately after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-087

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patient Satisfaction

Clinical Trials on Focus group interview

Subscribe