Evaluation of Long-term Adverse Effects of Gastric Bypass in Omega (OMEGA10)

December 18, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

The omega gastric bypass (OAGB) is developing worldwide as an alternative to the Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Cases of nutrition deficiency after OAGB, in particular protein deficency, are regularly reported in the literature, raising the question of the medium/long-term safety of this procedure. In its technology assessment report issued in September 2019 (HAS, 2019), the Haute Autorité de Santé rules on the invalidity of OAGB with a 200 cm biliary limb and the lack of sufficient data on the safety of OAGB with a 150 cm biliary limb compared to RYGB. The lack of long-term data on weight, resolution of comorbidities, quality of life, and endoscopic evaluation given the risk of lower esophageal cancer is also noted.

The main objective of the study is to compare the incidence of serious adverse events related to surgery after OAGB at 10 years, according to 2 types of loop: a realization with a 150-cm biliary loop (OAGB AB150) versus a realization with a 200-cm biliary loop (OAGB AB200).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

320

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Lille, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Claude Huriez - Service de chirurgie générale et endocrinienne
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study involves patients:

  • operated between 2008 and 2013 for an OAGB with a 150 or 200cm biliary limb
  • fulfilling the HAS criteria(HAS, 2009) at the time of their surgery: BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 associated with a comorbidity likely to be improved by weight loss
  • benefiting from a follow-up.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who received 10 ± 2 years ago (between 2009 and 2013) an OAGB with a 150 or 200cm biliary limb. Patients should be consecutive at each center.
  • Patients fulfilling the criteria of indication for bariatric surgery at the time of their intervention according to the recommendations of the HAS (HAS, 2009) in an expert center.
  • Patients agreeing to perform an endoscopic evaluation with biopsies at 10 years
  • Patients who gave their consent
  • Patients with health insurance coverage

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to bariatric surgery defined according to HAS recommendations (HAS, 2009)
  • Persons deprived of liberty, under guardianship, or under curatorship
  • Patients included in a protocol with a conflict of interest with OMEGA10.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
OAGB150
One anastomosis gastric bypass with 150cm biliary limb
Clinical, biological and endoscopic evaluation
OAGB200
One anastomosis gastric bypass with 200cm biliary limb
Clinical, biological and endoscopic evaluation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of serious surgery-related adverse events
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
A serious adverse event is defined as a medical event that requires hospitalization, is life-threatening, results in persistent or substantial disability, or results in death. The "surgery-related" character will be described by each investigator in the first instance and homogenized by the group of experts designated at the beginning of the study.
10 years after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of serious adverse events not related to surgery
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
10 years after surgery
Nutritional biological status , assessed by evaluation of malnutrition parameters
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
10 years after surgery
Nutritional clinical status, assessed by dietitian evaluation
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
10 years after surgery
Excess weight loss percentage
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
calculated as follows: (weight at 10 years - initial weight) / (initial weight - ideal weight) x 100 The ideal weight is defined as the weight corresponding to a BMI = 25 kg/m2. The initial weight is the weight on the day of surgery.
10 years after surgery
Metabolic comorbidities remission
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
10 years after surgery
Diabetes remission
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
10 years after surgery
Hypertension remission
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
10 years after surgery
Obstructive sleep apnea remission
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
10 years after surgery
Dyslipidemia remission
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
10 years after surgery
Quality of life by BAROS score (Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system)
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
10 years after surgery
Quality of life by GIQLI score (Gastro Intestinal Quality of Life index) questionnaires
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
The GIQLI is a score to evaluate digestive disorders in 36 items, ranging from 0 (the worst quality of life) to 144 (the best quality of life).
10 years after surgery
GERD
Time Frame: 10 years after surgery
GERD, assessed by clinical evaluation, PPI use, and endoscopic signs of GERD (gastritis, oesophagitis, anastomotic ulcer, Barrett's esophagus, gastric metaplasia, esophageal metaplasia
10 years after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Caiazzo, MD,PhD, University Hospital, Lille

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Ten year evaluation

Subscribe