- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04981353
Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block for Painless 1st Stage Normal Vaginal Delivery: Randomized Controlled Study
Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block for painless1st Stage Normal Vaginal Delivery: Randomized Controlled Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
- Numerical Rating Pain Score
- the Total Doses of Pethidine Needed Through-out Delivery Will be Measured
- the Incidence of Failed Delivery and Need of Cesarean Section Will be Assessed
- the Incidence of Transient Fetal Bradycardia or Deceleration After the Administration of the Block Will be Recorded
- ABGAR Score of the Neonate
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Aim of the work In this article, the efficacy of bilateral thoracic (ESP) to provide painless delivery without affecting the motor power (walking painless labor) will be studded.
The main objective:
1. numerical rating pain score (NRS) during the course of delivery will be recorded and compared.
Other objectives:
- the total doses of pethidine needed through-out delivery will be measured
- the incidence of failed delivery and need of cesarean section will be assessed
- the incidence of transient fetal bradycardia or deceleration after the administration of the block will be recorded
- ABGAR score of the neonate immediately after delivery and after 5min, 10min,15min after delivery. Will be recorded
Inclusion criteria :
Pregnant ladies aged 20-40 years, ASA 2, either prime or multipara , 37-40 weeks of gestation scheduled for vaginal delivery will be included in the study Exclusion criteria Pregnant ladies with complicated pregnancy eg; IUGR, accidental hemorrhage, preeclampsia Pregnant ladies scheduled for cesarean section Place of work: Labor ward in obstetric Department, Ain Shams University Hospital.
Sample size: all patients legible for the study will be enrolled and randomly allocated into one of the two groups. sample size was calculated using PASS 11.0 and based on a study carried out by Boules,2020. Group sample size of 15 in group 1 and 15 in group 2 achieves 100% power to detect difference of -4.0 between the null hypothesis that both group means are 2.0 and the alternative hypothesis that the mean of group 2 is 6.0 with estimated group standard deviations of 0.3 and a significance level (alpha ) of 0.05000 using a two-sided two-sample t-test. Sample size was inflated by 20% to account for attrition problem.
Methodology :
After taking the approval from Ain shams university ethical committee and informed consent from the pregnant ladies that will be legible for the study, detailed medical history of the patient will be taken and patient will be transported to operating room and basic monitors including ( ECG, pulse oximetry, NIBP)will be attached and basic reading of CTG will be recorded after that patient will be enrolled in two groups :(group 1) will be putted in sitting position and disinfecting her back. A real-time high-frequency linear ultrasound will be used to do the thoracic (ESP) at the level of T11 by visualizing the transverse process of T11 thoracic vertebrae and erector spinae muscle and injecting a 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% bilaterally using an in-plane technique, a 20-gauge, 70-mm needle (Tuoren, Henan, China) will be advanced into the plane below (ESM) after injecting lidocaine 1% 2ml at the site of injection, Needle will be advanced with a cranial to caudal direction (Boules et al,2020). (group 2) patients will receive pethidine 25mg doses if NRS >4. Patients of both groups will be positioned semi setting and CTG will be attached to her , blood pressure and maternal pulsations will be recorded every 15min throughout the delivery process. CTG records all over the labor time will be printed. Numerical rating scale (NRS) are the simplest and most widely used scale. The numerical scale is most commonly 0 to 10, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain imaginable." The patient draws a circle around the number that best describes the pain intensity. Advantages of NRS include simplicity, reproducibility, easy comprehensibility, and sensitivity to small changes in pain. It will be assessed every 30 min. throughout the delivery process. 25mg pethidine iv will be given if NRS >4 in both groups.
Endpoints of this study:
One hour after delivery of the newborn.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Abbasia
-
Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt
- Ain Shams University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- pregnant ladies 37-40 weeks of gestation scheduled for normal vaginal delivery ASA 2 either prime or multipara
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnant ladies with complicated pregnancy eg; IUGR,accidental hemorrhage, preeclampsia pregnant ladies scheduled for cesarean section
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: group 1
:(group 1) will be putted in sitting position and disinfecting her back.
A real-time high-frequency linear ultrasound will be used to do the thoracic (ESP) at the level of T11 by visualizing the transverse process of T11 thoracic vertebrae and erector spinae muscle and injecting a 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% bilaterally using an in-plane technique, a 20-gauge, 70-mm needle (Tuoren, Henan, China) will be advanced into the plane below (ESM) after injecting lidocaine 1% 2ml at the site of injection, Needle will be advanced with a cranial to caudal direction
|
A real-time high-frequency linear ultrasound will be used to do the thoracic (ESP) at the level of T11 by visualizing the transverse process of T11 thoracic vertebrae and erector spinae muscle and injecting a 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% bilaterally using an in-plane technique, a 20-gauge, 70-mm needle (Tuoren, Henan, China) will be advanced into the plane below (ESM) after injecting lidocaine 1% 2ml at the site of injection, Needle will be advanced with a cranial to caudal directio
|
|
Active Comparator: group 2
(group 2) patients will receive pethidine 25mg doses if NRS >4.
|
A real-time high-frequency linear ultrasound will be used to do the thoracic (ESP) at the level of T11 by visualizing the transverse process of T11 thoracic vertebrae and erector spinae muscle and injecting a 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% bilaterally using an in-plane technique, a 20-gauge, 70-mm needle (Tuoren, Henan, China) will be advanced into the plane below (ESM) after injecting lidocaine 1% 2ml at the site of injection, Needle will be advanced with a cranial to caudal directio
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
1. numerical rating pain score (NRS) during the course of delivery
Time Frame: every 30 minutes throughout the delivery
|
1. numerical rating pain score (NRS) during the course of delivery will be recorded and compared
|
every 30 minutes throughout the delivery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
1. the total doses of pethidine needed through-out delivery will be measured
Time Frame: throughout the first stage of delivery
|
throughout the first stage of delivery
|
|
2. the incidence of failed delivery and need of cesarean section will be assessed
Time Frame: throughout delivery time
|
throughout delivery time
|
|
3. the incidence of transient fetal bradycardia or deceleration after the administration of the block will be recorded
Time Frame: immediately after administration of the block
|
immediately after administration of the block
|
|
4. ABGAR score of the neonate immediately after delivery and after 5min, 10min,15min after delivery. Will be recorded
Time Frame: at birth , after 5 min., 10min., 15 min.
|
at birth , after 5 min., 10min., 15 min.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- FMASU R 134/2021
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Numerical Rating Pain Score
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalNot yet recruitingOpioid Consumption | Demographic Data | Numerical Rating Scale
-
Harran UniversityCompletedCortisol | Bariatric Sleeve Gastrectomy | Opioid Analgesia | Erector Spina Plan Block | Numerical Rating ScaleTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompletedSingle Traumatic Limb Injury With Severe Pain (Score > 5/10 on Numerical Pain Scale)France
-
Western University, CanadaUnknownTo Determine the Onset of Analgesia (Numerical Rating Scale for Pain = 1) in Minutes
-
Marmara UniversityRecruitingLumbar Spinal Stenosis | Claudication | Disability Physical | Magnetic Resonance | Numerical Rating ScaleTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Tanta UniversityNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Assessment of Pain Intensity Using 10-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-10)(9)Immediately After Intervention , 1 Week,1month,3 Months,6months and One Year | Assessment of Knee Function Using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
-
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research...CompletedPain Score | Morphine ConsumptionPakistan
-
University of ArizonaNot yet recruitingCesarian Section | Pain Score Reduction
-
University of MostarUnknownPain Score | Apgar Score | Mental Health Issue | Delivery Mode | Breastfeeding RateBosnia and Herzegovina
-
University Hospital, GrenobleFondation Apicil; SFMUCompletedSevere Traumatic Pain | Numeric Pain Rating Scale > 5 / 10France
Clinical Trials on bilateral erector spinae plane block at T11
-
University of California, San FranciscoRecruitingErector Spinae Plane Block | Lumbar Spine SurgeryUnited States
-
Umraniye Education and Research HospitalActive, not recruitingErector Spinae Plane Block | Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia RepairTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Regional Anesthesia | Multimodal AnalgesiaTurkey
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedChildren | Erector Spinae Plane Block | Caudal Block | Caudal Block for Postoperative Analgesia | Caudal Anesthesia | Local Analgesia Via Infiltration | Caudal Epidural AnesthesiaEgypt
-
Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute...Not yet recruiting
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedMyofascial Pain SyndromeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalNot yet recruitingPostoperative Pain Management | Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery | Erector Spina Plan BlockTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Samsun UniversityRecruitingAcute Pain | Spinal Stenosis LumbarTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Kayseri City HospitalCompletedCerebral Desaturation | Near Infrared Spectroscopy | One Lung Ventillation (OLV) | Intraoperative Analgesic Use | Erector Spina Plan BlockTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Fadime TosunNot yet recruitingNephrolithiasis | Renal Calculi | Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)