- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04988373
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Single Aligner Appliance for Treatment of Mild Crowding Cases in Adults.
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Modified Aligner Appliance With NiTi Springs for Treatment of Mild Crowding Cases in Adults.
36 participants who have mild crowding from the Orthodontic Department at University of Damascus Dental School will be randomly assigned into two groups.
- In the experimental group, patients will be treated using single aligner appliance in order to align their crowding teeth.
- Control group will undergo typical orthodontic treatment using an MBT-prescription of metallic brackets.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
- Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults patients aged between (16 - 28) years.
- Class I malocclusion with Mild crowding (1 - 4) mm in the anterior region of the mandibular dental arch
- All lower teeth are existed (except for third molars).
- No congenitally missing or extracted teeth (except for third molars)
- Patients have not undergone previous orthodontic treatment.
- Patient with good oral hygiene (Plaque Index less than 1).
- With no severe skeletal discrepancy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bimaxillary dentoalveolar severe protrusion.
- Any systemic diseases affect teeth movement.
- Bad oral hygiene.
- Patient lack of commitment toward follow-up appointments.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Single aligner appliance
Modified aligner appliance with NiTi springs
|
Patients will be treated using a single aligner appliance with NiTi Springs in order to align their crowding teeth.
|
|
Active Comparator: Traditional fixed appliances
MBT-prescription of metallic brackets.
|
Patients will undergo typical orthodontic treatment using an MBT-prescription of metallic brackets.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Alignment
Time Frame: The assessment is based on calculating days from the beginning of treatment till the end of the alignment stage which is expected to happen within 4 to 6 months
|
The time required in days will be calculated from the beginning of treatment till the end of the alignment stage.
|
The assessment is based on calculating days from the beginning of treatment till the end of the alignment stage which is expected to happen within 4 to 6 months
|
|
Change in Little's Index of Irregularity
Time Frame: T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
The irregularity of the lower incisors is calculated by measuring the amount of deviations of the anatomic contact points between the six anterior teeth in the horizontal direction in mm, since the sum of these measurements represents the value of the index (Little, 1975). When the sum of these deviations is less than 3 mm, this indicates that the teeth are slightly crowded. When the sum is greater than 10 mm, this indicated very severe crowding. The ordinary orthodontic treatment aims to keep this Index less than 1 mm at the end of treatment. |
T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
|
Change in Lower Incisors Inclination
Time Frame: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: at the end of the alignment stage which is expected to happen within 4 to 6 months
|
The angle between the long axis of the lower Incisors and the mandible plane (Go-Me) will be measured using Cephalometric x ray.
|
immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: at the end of the alignment stage which is expected to happen within 4 to 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the perception of self-reported pain
Time Frame: : T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months)
|
At each adjustment visit, patients in both groups will be given a prepared Self-reported pain questionnaire to complete over the following week and to be returned at each subsequent visit.
This questionnaire records pain by means of a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS).
The left end of the line refers to no pain (VAS=0) where the right end refers to maximum pain (VAS=100).
The level of pain is represented in the number of millimeters measured from the left end of the line to the mark pointed out by the patient.
This is called the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) where the higher the number is the more intense the pain.
|
: T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months)
|
|
Change in the perception of discomfort
Time Frame: T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
At each adjustment visit, patients in both groups will be given a prepared discomfort questionnaire to complete over the following week and to be returned at each subsequent visit.
This questionnaire records discomfort by means of a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS).
The left end of the line refers to no discomfort (VAS=0) where the right end refers to maximum discomfort (VAS=100).
The level of discomfort is represented in the number of millimeters measured from the left end of the line to the mark pointed out by the patient.
This is called the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) where the higher the number is the more intense the discomfort.
|
T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
|
The change in the plaque index
Time Frame: T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
Assessment will be achieved using a gingival probe according to Silness and Loe (1964). The criteria for plaque index as: 0: No plaque
|
T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
|
The change in the gingival index index
Time Frame: T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months)
|
Assessment will be achieved using a gingival probe according to Silness and Loe (1964). The criteria for gingival index as: 0: Normal gingiva.
|
T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months)
|
|
The change in papillary bleeding index
Time Frame: T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months)
|
Assessment will be achieved using a gingival probe according to Muhlemann (1977). 0: No bleeding.
|
T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months)
|
|
Changes in oral health related quality of life
Time Frame: T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
Patients in both groups will be given a questionnaire to be filled at each adjustment visit.
The questionnaire to be used is called Oral-Health-Impact-Profile with 14 items (OHIP-14).
OHIP-14 includes a subjective evaluation of the individual's oral health, functional well-being, emotional well-being, expectations and satisfaction with care and sense of self.
|
T0: immediately before the start of orthodontic treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
|
Patients' satisfaction
Time Frame: At the end of leveling and alignment which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
Patients in both groups will be asked two questions about satisfaction with the appearance of the orthodontic appliance and satisfaction with the progress and results of the treatment.
The answer will be collected using three-point scale (1.
good or 2. moderate or 3. bad ).
|
At the end of leveling and alignment which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
|
The possibility of repeating the procedure
Time Frame: At the end of leveling and alignment which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
Patients in both groups will be asked about the possibility of repeating the procedure if they had the chance to give their decision again.
The answer will be collected using three-point scale (1.
yes or 2. No).
|
At the end of leveling and alignment which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
|
Recommendation to a friend
Time Frame: At the end of leveling and alignment which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
Patients in both groups will be asked about if they would recommend this procedure to a friend.
The answer will be collected using a two-point scale (1.
Yes or 2. No).
|
At the end of leveling and alignment which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ziad M Alhafi, DDS, MSc student at the Orthodontic Department, University of Damascus Dental
- Study Chair: Nada Rajeh, DDS,MSc,PhD, Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Little RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod. 1975 Nov;68(5):554-63. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90086-x.
- Hennessy J, Al-Awadhi EA. Clear aligners generations and orthodontic tooth movement. J Orthod. 2016 Mar;43(1):68-76. doi: 10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000004.
- Barrer HG. Protecting the integrity of mandibular incisor position through keystoning procedure and spring retainer appliance. J Clin Orthod. 1975 Aug;9(8):486-94. No abstract available.
- Qureshi A. The Inman Aligner for anterior tooth alignment. Dent Update. 2008 Oct;35(8):569-71, 574-6. doi: 10.12968/denu.2008.35.8.569.
- Hennessy J, Al-Awadhi EA. Clear aligners generations and orthodontic tooth movement. J Orthod. 2016 Jan 8:1-9. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2015.1108725. Online ahead of print.
- Alhafi ZM, Rajeh N. Evaluation of the effectiveness of modified aligner appliance with nickel-titanium springs in treatment of mild crowding of lower incisors: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J World Fed Orthod. 2022 Aug;11(4):107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 May 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- UDDS-Ortho-06-2021
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.