- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05017584
ED90 of 0.75% Bupivacaine for Bilateral Tubal Ligation (BTL)
Determining the ED90 for Intrathecal 0.75% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Bilateral Tubal Ligation
Study Overview
Study Type
Phase
- Phase 4
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥ 18 years of age
- American Society of Anesthesiology class II or III
- bilateral tubal ligation
Exclusion Criteria:
- patient refusal
- BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2
- American Society of Anesthesiology class IV or above
- contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia
- allergy to bupivacaine
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Hyperbaric bupivacaine 10.5mg
|
The dose for the first subject (A#X) will be 12 mg 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Two possible outcomes will be recorded: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia which is determined by occurrence of intraoperative pain and the need for intraoperative analgesia supplementation. Satisfactory analgesia will be defined as a sensory block to the T8 dermatome and the patient shall require no further supplementation for discomfort during her procedure. Unsatisfactory analgesia will be defined as a block not achieving a T8 dermatomal level or when a patient requests additional medication for discomfort at any time during her procedure. The dose for the next (A#X+1) will be adjusted based on the outcome from previous subjects respectively using up-down sequential allocation method with a biased-coin design. This process will continue in similar fashion with dose adjustments for next subjects to be based on outcome from subjects immediately prior. |
|
Experimental: Hyperbaric bupivacaine 12mg
|
The dose for the first subject (A#X) will be 12 mg 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Two possible outcomes will be recorded: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia which is determined by occurrence of intraoperative pain and the need for intraoperative analgesia supplementation. Satisfactory analgesia will be defined as a sensory block to the T8 dermatome and the patient shall require no further supplementation for discomfort during her procedure. Unsatisfactory analgesia will be defined as a block not achieving a T8 dermatomal level or when a patient requests additional medication for discomfort at any time during her procedure. The dose for the next (A#X+1) will be adjusted based on the outcome from previous subjects respectively using up-down sequential allocation method with a biased-coin design. This process will continue in similar fashion with dose adjustments for next subjects to be based on outcome from subjects immediately prior. |
|
Experimental: Hyperbaric bupivacaine 13.5mg
|
The dose for the first subject (A#X) will be 12 mg 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Two possible outcomes will be recorded: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia which is determined by occurrence of intraoperative pain and the need for intraoperative analgesia supplementation. Satisfactory analgesia will be defined as a sensory block to the T8 dermatome and the patient shall require no further supplementation for discomfort during her procedure. Unsatisfactory analgesia will be defined as a block not achieving a T8 dermatomal level or when a patient requests additional medication for discomfort at any time during her procedure. The dose for the next (A#X+1) will be adjusted based on the outcome from previous subjects respectively using up-down sequential allocation method with a biased-coin design. This process will continue in similar fashion with dose adjustments for next subjects to be based on outcome from subjects immediately prior. |
|
Experimental: Hyperbaric bupivacaine 15mg
|
The dose for the first subject (A#X) will be 12 mg 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Two possible outcomes will be recorded: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia which is determined by occurrence of intraoperative pain and the need for intraoperative analgesia supplementation. Satisfactory analgesia will be defined as a sensory block to the T8 dermatome and the patient shall require no further supplementation for discomfort during her procedure. Unsatisfactory analgesia will be defined as a block not achieving a T8 dermatomal level or when a patient requests additional medication for discomfort at any time during her procedure. The dose for the next (A#X+1) will be adjusted based on the outcome from previous subjects respectively using up-down sequential allocation method with a biased-coin design. This process will continue in similar fashion with dose adjustments for next subjects to be based on outcome from subjects immediately prior. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Dose (in mg) of intrathecal 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine that provides effective analgesia in 90% of patients undergoing bilateral tubal ligation as measured by patient reported effectiveness.
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
|
End of study, up to 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during surgery
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
|
Pain rating 0-10 as outlined by the NPRS by patient during procedure, in the post-anesthesia care unit, and overall at discharge
|
End of study, up to 2 years
|
|
Side effects
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
|
Incidence of side effects intra-operatively
|
End of study, up to 2 years
|
|
Nausea
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
|
Presence of absence of nausea
|
End of study, up to 2 years
|
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
|
Presence of absence of vomiting
|
End of study, up to 2 years
|
|
Itching
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
|
Presence of absence of itching
|
End of study, up to 2 years
|
|
Vasopressor use
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
|
Number of participants requiring the of vasopressors (phenylephrine and ephedrine).
Indicated for blood pressure drops greater than 15% below baseline or < 100mm Hg systolic.
|
End of study, up to 2 years
|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
|
Overall patient satisfaction at discharge as measured by patient report.
This will be obtained using a scale of 1-5 where 1 = very unsatisfied, 2 = unsatisfied, 3 = neither unsatisfied or satisfied, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied
|
End of study, up to 2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Cameron Taylor, MD, Duke University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00109119
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg PainUnited States
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
Qi's ClinicNot yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
-
noiVita SrlsUniversity of Eastern PiedmontCompletedCervical Pain | Pain Management | Lumbar Pain | Muscular | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck)Italy
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingPain, Acute | Chronic Post Operative Pain | Pain, ChronicHong Kong
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
University of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital FoundationCompletedPain | Pain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain, IntractableCanada
Clinical Trials on Hyperbaric bupivacaine
-
PAEC General Hospital, IslamabadNot yet recruiting
-
University of Health Sciences Balikesir Hospital...Not yet recruitingSpinal Anesthesia | Hemodynamic Changes | Bupivacaine | Patient Positions
-
Bursa City HospitalCompletedTotal Knee Replacement | Intracranial Pressure Change | Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter MeasurementTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Serkan KumbasarRecruitingPostoperative PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Aswan UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of AlexandriaCompleted
-
Hospital Civil de GuadalajaraRecruitingEffect of Subarachnoid Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Obese Pregnant Patients Undergoing Cesarean SectionAnesthesia | Obstetric Anesthesia ProblemsMexico
-
Tanta UniversityActive, not recruitingSpinal Anesthesia in Elderly PatientsEgypt
-
Hospital Civil de GuadalajaraCompletedAnesthesia, ObstetricalMexico
-
Hamdard UniversityCompletedHaemodynamic InstabilityPakistan