ED90 of 0.75% Bupivacaine for Bilateral Tubal Ligation (BTL)

May 23, 2022 updated by: Duke University

Determining the ED90 for Intrathecal 0.75% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Bilateral Tubal Ligation

The purpose of this study is to determine the dose of bupivacaine that provides effective pain management in 90% (ED90) of patients undergoing bilateral tubal ligation. This will guide anesthesiologists on the most effective dose to minimize intraoperative pain during this procedure. The goal is to make women as comfortable as possible when they undergo this procedure while also minimizing the amount of time they are required to remain in the hospital afterwards for monitoring.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • American Society of Anesthesiology class II or III
  • bilateral tubal ligation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal
  • BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2
  • American Society of Anesthesiology class IV or above
  • contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia
  • allergy to bupivacaine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hyperbaric bupivacaine 10.5mg

The dose for the first subject (A#X) will be 12 mg 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Two possible outcomes will be recorded: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia which is determined by occurrence of intraoperative pain and the need for intraoperative analgesia supplementation. Satisfactory analgesia will be defined as a sensory block to the T8 dermatome and the patient shall require no further supplementation for discomfort during her procedure. Unsatisfactory analgesia will be defined as a block not achieving a T8 dermatomal level or when a patient requests additional medication for discomfort at any time during her procedure.

The dose for the next (A#X+1) will be adjusted based on the outcome from previous subjects respectively using up-down sequential allocation method with a biased-coin design. This process will continue in similar fashion with dose adjustments for next subjects to be based on outcome from subjects immediately prior.

Experimental: Hyperbaric bupivacaine 12mg

The dose for the first subject (A#X) will be 12 mg 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Two possible outcomes will be recorded: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia which is determined by occurrence of intraoperative pain and the need for intraoperative analgesia supplementation. Satisfactory analgesia will be defined as a sensory block to the T8 dermatome and the patient shall require no further supplementation for discomfort during her procedure. Unsatisfactory analgesia will be defined as a block not achieving a T8 dermatomal level or when a patient requests additional medication for discomfort at any time during her procedure.

The dose for the next (A#X+1) will be adjusted based on the outcome from previous subjects respectively using up-down sequential allocation method with a biased-coin design. This process will continue in similar fashion with dose adjustments for next subjects to be based on outcome from subjects immediately prior.

Experimental: Hyperbaric bupivacaine 13.5mg

The dose for the first subject (A#X) will be 12 mg 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Two possible outcomes will be recorded: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia which is determined by occurrence of intraoperative pain and the need for intraoperative analgesia supplementation. Satisfactory analgesia will be defined as a sensory block to the T8 dermatome and the patient shall require no further supplementation for discomfort during her procedure. Unsatisfactory analgesia will be defined as a block not achieving a T8 dermatomal level or when a patient requests additional medication for discomfort at any time during her procedure.

The dose for the next (A#X+1) will be adjusted based on the outcome from previous subjects respectively using up-down sequential allocation method with a biased-coin design. This process will continue in similar fashion with dose adjustments for next subjects to be based on outcome from subjects immediately prior.

Experimental: Hyperbaric bupivacaine 15mg

The dose for the first subject (A#X) will be 12 mg 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Two possible outcomes will be recorded: satisfactory or unsatisfactory anesthesia which is determined by occurrence of intraoperative pain and the need for intraoperative analgesia supplementation. Satisfactory analgesia will be defined as a sensory block to the T8 dermatome and the patient shall require no further supplementation for discomfort during her procedure. Unsatisfactory analgesia will be defined as a block not achieving a T8 dermatomal level or when a patient requests additional medication for discomfort at any time during her procedure.

The dose for the next (A#X+1) will be adjusted based on the outcome from previous subjects respectively using up-down sequential allocation method with a biased-coin design. This process will continue in similar fashion with dose adjustments for next subjects to be based on outcome from subjects immediately prior.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Dose (in mg) of intrathecal 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine that provides effective analgesia in 90% of patients undergoing bilateral tubal ligation as measured by patient reported effectiveness.
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
End of study, up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during surgery
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
Pain rating 0-10 as outlined by the NPRS by patient during procedure, in the post-anesthesia care unit, and overall at discharge
End of study, up to 2 years
Side effects
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
Incidence of side effects intra-operatively
End of study, up to 2 years
Nausea
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
Presence of absence of nausea
End of study, up to 2 years
Vomiting
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
Presence of absence of vomiting
End of study, up to 2 years
Itching
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
Presence of absence of itching
End of study, up to 2 years
Vasopressor use
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
Number of participants requiring the of vasopressors (phenylephrine and ephedrine). Indicated for blood pressure drops greater than 15% below baseline or < 100mm Hg systolic.
End of study, up to 2 years
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: End of study, up to 2 years
Overall patient satisfaction at discharge as measured by patient report. This will be obtained using a scale of 1-5 where 1 = very unsatisfied, 2 = unsatisfied, 3 = neither unsatisfied or satisfied, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied
End of study, up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cameron Taylor, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Hyperbaric bupivacaine

Subscribe