- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06060015
Effect of Subarachnoid Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Obese Pregnant Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section
September 22, 2023 updated by: María de los Angeles Campechano Ascencio, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
Effect of Subarachnoid Hyperbaric Bupivacaine on Mean Arterial Pressure in Obese Pregnant Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section
Evaluates the effect of hyperbaric subarachnoid bupivacaine at doses of 5 mg vs 10 mg on mean arterial pressure in obese pregnant patients undergoing cesarean section
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients over 18 years of age, with a pregnancy of ≥37 weeks of gestation and adequate fetal well-being, with obesity with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 presented for cesarean surgery will be included in the study.
The objectives of the study protocol, benefits, and benefits will be explained to them.
and risks and by election by sealed envelope will be assigned to one of the two study groups, they will be given to sign the consent letter under information.
They underwent pre-anesthetic evaluation, baseline vital signs: non-invasive blood pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), O2 saturation and heart rate, fetal heart rate will be recorded from the fetal monitor.
A preload of Hartmann's solution fluids at 10ml/kg of pre-pregnancy weight and premedication with omeprazole 40mg and metoclopramide 10mg will be administered.
Once inside the operating room, baseline vital signs will be recorded and the placement of anesthesia with mixed technique neuraxial block (epidural catheter placement + subarachnoid block) will begin in a sitting position, the anatomical reference of the intervertebral space L2-L3, L3- will be located.
L4.
The aseptic and antiseptic technique with povidone-iodine and alcohol will be performed on the skin, sterile fields will be placed, the skin and subcutaneous tissue will be infiltrated with 5 ml of 2% lidocaine, a Tuohy No. 17 needle is inserted with the "hanging Drop" technique, to locate the epidural space, it was corroborated with the "loss of resistance" technique.
Through the "Tuohy needle", the "spinal needle" No. 27 spinal needle is inserted until cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is obtained.
The blocking dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine of 10 mg (2 ml) or mg (1 ml) will be administered according to the assigned group; The "spinal needle" was withdrawn and the epidural catheter was inserted in a cephalic direction, leaving 5 cm inside the epidural space.
The catheter was fixed to the skin with adhesive tape for later use.
The patient will be placed in the supine position and a position is given with the surgical table 30 degrees to the left.
Vital sign monitoring was started every 3 minutes for the first 15 minutes and then every 5 minutes until the end of the procedure.
When a MAP record of less than 20% is obtained at the beginning, 10 mg ephedrine will be administered, an evaluation of the sensory block will begin 6 minutes after administering the block dose, with the prick technique, this evaluation will be It will be performed every 3 minutes during the first 15 minutes and then every 15 minutes until the end of the surgery.
Simultaneously, an assessment of motor blockade will begin with a Bromage scale.
After taking the second vital signs (3 minutes), the patient will be asked if she feels nauseated or if she vomits and it will be recorded.
At the time of the extraction of the fetus, the Apgar score given by the neonatologist at one minute and at 5 minutes of extrauterine life will be recorded.
Once the placenta has been delivered, a sample for gasometry will be taken with a heparinized syringe from the umbilical artery and sent to the laboratory for processing.
A dose of local anesthetic will be administered through a 5% to 2% lidocaine epidural catheter if the patient reports discomfort or pain and the surgical procedure has not been completed.
The information collected will be recorded in the data collection sheet.
The sample size was calculated with a formula for comparing two means with a finite population.A pilot test was carried out with the specified criteria, which included 40 patients, 20 patients received 5 mg of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine and 20 patients received 10 mg, for the maximum arterial hypotension variable registered a standard deviation of 16.87 was obtained.
The finite population was obtained by registering the total cesarean sections of the Civil Hospital of Guadalajara performed during the year 2022, which were 1,256 cesarean sections and losses of 20% are calculated, obtaining a total of 53 patients per group with a total of 106 patients.
Once the sample is completed, the database will be started in the Microsoft Office Excel program, which will be exported to the statistical program Statistics Product and Service Solution (SPSS) for statistical analysis.
The data obtained will be expressed through measures of central tendency and dispersion, mean, minimum, maximum, median and standard deviation for quantitative variables, and frequencies and percentages in the case of qualitative variables.
The intragroup differences for the quantitative variables were performed using the Student's T test, differences between the groups were determined with the U Mann Whitney test.
Qualitative variables will be analyzed with the Chi Square test.
A value of p≤0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
106
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: María de los Angeles Campechano Ascencio, MSc
- Phone Number: +5213310233983
- Email: angelescampechano@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Miriam Mendez del Villar, PhD
- Phone Number: +5213310640220
- Email: miriamendez@hotmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Jalisco
-
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44280
- Recruiting
- Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
-
Contact:
- MARIA DE LOS ANGELES CAMPECHANO ASCENCIO, MSc
- Phone Number: 3310233983 +5213310233983
- Email: angelescampechano@hotmail.com
-
Contact:
- MIRIAM MENDEZ DEL VILLAR, MSc PhD
- Phone Number: +5213310640220
- Email: miriamendez@hotmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- MARIA DE LOS ANGELES CAMPECHANO-ASCENCIO, MSc
-
Sub-Investigator:
- MIRIAM MENDEZ-DEL VILLAR, MSc PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- LEONEL GARCIA-BENAVIDES, MSc PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- JORGE BRAVO-RUBIO, MSc
-
Sub-Investigator:
- EDY DAVID RUBIO-ARELLANO, MSc
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy ≥37 weeks gestation with single fetus
- Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2
- Indication of termination of pregnancy via abdominal caesarean section
- Indication of subarachnoid neuraxial block under mixed technique
- Signing of consent under information
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy to local anesthetics
- Psychiatric treatment (antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics)
- Addiction to any type of drug
- Liver, renal, pulmonary or cardiac disease
- High blood pressure
- Type I, II and gestational diabetes
- Diagnostic of non-calming fetal state
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 5mg bupivacaine
Anesthetic technique, the patient receives subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 5mg
|
Anesthetic technique, the patient receives subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 5mg
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: 10mg bupivacaine
Anesthetic technique, the patient receives subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 10mg
|
Anesthetic technique, the patient receives subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 10 mg
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assess the mean blood pressure
Time Frame: 3 hour
|
Number of pregnant patients with obesity who present a decrease in mean arterial pressure after the administration of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine with doses of 5mg and 10mg during cesarean surgery
|
3 hour
|
|
Determine the effects on the heart rate
Time Frame: 3 hour
|
Number of pregnant patients with obesity who present changes in heart rate such as bradycardia (heart rate less than 60 beats minute) or tachycardia (heart rate greater than 120 beats minute) after administration of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine with doses of 5mg and 10 mg during cesarean surgery
|
3 hour
|
|
Determine the effects on the O2 saturation
Time Frame: 3 hour
|
Number of pregnant patients with obesity who present changes in O2 saturation after administration of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine with doses of 5mg and 10mg during cesarean surgery
|
3 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Document the Apgar score
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Document the Apgar score in the newborn.
(Apgar Score evaluate five sign: color, heart rate, reflex irritability, muscle tone and respiration) The score ranges from 0 to 2 per sign according to the criteria of the neonatologist, to grant a maximum score of 10 points.
A grade of less than 7 points is considered low Apgar scores.
This scores is registered t minute and five minutes of life.
|
5 minutes
|
|
Describe the adverse effects (nausea or vomiting)
Time Frame: 3 hour
|
Number of pregnant patients with obesity with side effects such as nausea or vomiting after administration of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine with doses of 5mg and 10 mg during cesarean surgery
|
3 hour
|
|
Identify the level of sensory blockade
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
Number of pregnant patients with obesity with adequate sensory block (thoracic dermatome 4 is defined as adequate to begin the surgical technique), the level of sensory block reached after the administration of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine with doses of 5mg and 10mg.
The sensory block was evaluated using pinprick.
Every 3 minutes the first 15 minutes after the subarachnoid block.
|
15 minutes
|
|
Describe the adverse effects on the fetus
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Number of pregnant patients with obesity with any side effect associated with the fetal bradycardia anesthetic technique (Fetal heart rate less than 120 beats minute) cardiac arrest (Fetal heart rate less than 100 beats minute) And in the newborn fetal acidosis (umbilical vein gasometry with Hydrogen Potential (pH) <7.0 or excess bases >-12 mmol/L)
|
1 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: María de los Angeles Campechano Ascencio, MSc, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
- Study Director: Miriam Mendez del Villar, PhD, Universidad de Guadalajara Centro Universitario de Tonalá
- Study Chair: Leonel Garcia Benavides, PhD, Universidad de Guadalajara Centro Universitario de Tonalá
- Study Chair: Jorge Bravo Rubio, MSc, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara
- Study Chair: Edy David Rubio Arellano, MSc, Universidad de Guadalajara Centro Universitario Ciencias de la Salud
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Tonidandel A, Booth J, D'Angelo R, Harris L, Tonidandel S. Anesthetic and obstetric outcomes in morbidly obese parturients: a 20-year follow-up retrospective cohort study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014 Nov;23(4):357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Erratum In: Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 Feb;24(1):96.
- Ouzounian JG, Elkayam U. Physiologic changes during normal pregnancy and delivery. Cardiol Clin. 2012 Aug;30(3):317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
- Hood DD, Dewan DM. Anesthetic and obstetric outcome in morbidly obese parturients. Anesthesiology. 1993 Dec;79(6):1210-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199312000-00011.
- Tan T, Sia AT. Anesthesia considerations in the obese gravida. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Dec;35(6):350-5. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.05.021.
- Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Tan PE, Ng FF, Karmakar MK. Placental transfer and fetal metabolic effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2009 Sep;111(3):506-12. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b160a3.
- Lee Y, Balki M, Parkes R, Carvalho JC. Dose requirement of intrathecal bupivacaine for cesarean delivery is similar in obese and normal weight women. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 Nov-Dec;59(6):674-83. doi: 10.1016/s0034-7094(09)70092-3. English, Portuguese.
- Carvalho B, Collins J, Drover DR, Atkinson Ralls L, Riley ET. ED(50) and ED(95) of intrathecal bupivacaine in morbidly obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2011 Mar;114(3):529-35. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318209a92d.
- Ring LE. The anesthetic approach to operative delivery of the extremely obese parturient. Semin Perinatol. 2014 Oct;38(6):341-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
- Badve MH, Golfeiz C, Vallejo MC. Anesthetic considerations for the morbid obese parturient. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2014 Summer;52(3):132-47. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000024. No abstract available.
- Lamon AM, Habib AS. Managing anesthesia for cesarean section in obese patients: current perspectives. Local Reg Anesth. 2016 Aug 16;9:45-57. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S64279. eCollection 2016.
- Dennis AT, Castro JM, Ong M, Carr C. Haemodynamics in obese pregnant women. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Apr;21(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.11.007. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
- Rodrigues FR, Brandao MJ. Regional anesthesia for cesarean section in obese pregnant women: a retrospective study. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;61(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70002-2.
- Wise RA, Polito AJ, Krishnan V. Respiratory physiologic changes in pregnancy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006 Feb;26(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2005.10.004.
- Chandra S, Tripathi AK, Mishra S, Amzarul M, Vaish AK. Physiological changes in hematological parameters during pregnancy. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2012 Sep;28(3):144-6. doi: 10.1007/s12288-012-0175-6. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 549: obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):213-7. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000425667.10377.60.
- Soens MA, Birnbach DJ, Ranasinghe JS, van Zundert A. Obstetric anesthesia for the obese and morbidly obese patient: an ounce of prevention is worth more than a pound of treatment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Jan;52(1):6-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01483.x.
- Gaiser R. Anesthetic Considerations in the Obese Parturient. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;59(1):193-203. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000180.
- Nani FS, Torres ML. Correlation between the body mass index (BMI) of pregnant women and the development of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;61(1):21-30. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70003-4.
- Klohr S, Roth R, Hofmann T, Rossaint R, Heesen M. Definitions of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: literature search and application to parturients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Sep;54(8):909-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02239.x. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
- Rasolonjatovo TY, Ravololonirina BM, Randriamanantany ZA, Raveloson NE. [Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: risk factors for emergence of Apgar scores below 7 in Malagasy newborns]. Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Oct 23;19:193. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2014.19.193.3392. eCollection 2014. French.
- Mercier FJ, Auge M, Hoffmann C, Fischer C, Le Gouez A. Maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean delivery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Jan;79(1):62-73. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
- Polin CM, Hale B, Mauritz AA, Habib AS, Jones CA, Strouch ZY, Dominguez JE. Anesthetic management of super-morbidly obese parturients for cesarean delivery with a double neuraxial catheter technique: a case series. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 Aug;24(3):276-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
- Sng BL, Siddiqui FJ, Leong WL, Assam PN, Chan ES, Tan KH, Sia AT. Hyperbaric versus isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 15;9(9):CD005143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005143.pub3.
- Hollowell J, Pillas D, Rowe R, Linsell L, Knight M, Brocklehurst P. The impact of maternal obesity on intrapartum outcomes in otherwise low risk women: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2014 Feb;121(3):343-55. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12437. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
- Zhu T, Tang J, Zhao F, Qu Y, Mu D. Association between maternal obesity and offspring Apgar score or cord pH: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 22;5:18386. doi: 10.1038/srep18386.
- Edwards RK, Cantu J, Cliver S, Biggio JR Jr, Owen J, Tita ATN. The association of maternal obesity with fetal pH and base deficit at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):262-267. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829b1e62.
- Reyes M, Pan PH. Very low-dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in a morbidly obese preeclamptic patient and its potential implications. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2004 Apr;13(2):99-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2003.09.004.
- Bamgbade OA, Khalaf WM, Ajai O, Sharma R, Chidambaram V, Madhavan G. Obstetric anaesthesia outcome in obese and non-obese parturients undergoing caesarean delivery: an observational study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Jul;18(3):221-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.07.013. Epub 2009 May 17.
- Ngaka TC, Coetzee JF, Dyer RA. The Influence of Body Mass Index on Sensorimotor Block and Vasopressor Requirement During Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery. Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1527-1534. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001568.
- Eltzschig HK, Lieberman ES, Camann WR. Regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 23;348(4):319-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra021276. No abstract available.
- Teoh WH, Thomas E, Tan HM. Ultra-low dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine 3.75 mg for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006 Oct;15(4):273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
- Hassanin AS, El-Shahawy HF, Hussain SH, Bahaa Eldin AM, Elhawary MM, Elbakery M, Elsafty MSE. Impact of interval between induction of spinal anesthesia to delivery on umbilical arterial cord ph of neonates delivered by elective cesarean section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04536-y.
- Kominiarek MA, Chauhan SP. Obesity Before, During, and After Pregnancy: A Review and Comparison of Five National Guidelines. Am J Perinatol. 2016 Apr;33(5):433-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1567856. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
- Silva JC, Amaral AR, Ferreira BD, Petry JF, Silva MR, Krelling PC. [Obesity during pregnancy: gestational complications and birth outcomes.]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2014 Nov;36(11):509-513. doi: 10.1590/s0100-720320140005024. Epub 2014 Nov 1. Portuguese.
- Kim ST. Anesthetic management of obese and morbidly obese parturients. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Oct;16(4):313-321. doi: 10.17085/apm.21090. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
- Arias J, Lacassie HJ. [Prophylaxis and treatment of arterial hypotension during caesarean with spinal anaesthesia]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2013 Nov;60(9):511-8. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.023. Epub 2012 Oct 23. Spanish.
- Davies GAL, Maxwell C, McLeod L. No. 239-Obesity in Pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Aug;40(8):e630-e639. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.05.018.
- Lamon AM, Einhorn LM, Cooter M, Habib AS. The impact of body mass index on the risk of high spinal block in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study. J Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):552-558. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2352-0. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
- Committee Membership:; Burns S, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, Johansen M, Jones L, Krassioukov A, Kirshblum S, Mulcahey MJ, Read MS, Waring W. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012 Winter;18(1):85-99. doi: 10.1310/sci1801-85. No abstract available.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 22, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
September 29, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 29, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 22, 2023
Last Verified
September 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 168/23
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anesthesia
-
Samsun UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Regional Anesthesia | Anesthesia ManagementTurkey
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectGermany
-
Novocol Pharmaceutical of Canada, Inc.CompletedAnesthesia, Local | Dental Anesthesia | Anesthesia, ReversalUnited States
-
Universitas Sebelas MaretIndonesia Endowment Fund for EducationNot yet recruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; Reaction
-
University Health Network, TorontoActive, not recruiting
-
University of PecsCompleted
-
Hormozgan University of Medical SciencesUnknownAnesthesia | Anesthesia; FunctionalIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentCompletedAnesthesia | Sedation | Anesthesia, Intravenous | Sedation Complication | Recovery From Anesthesia | Monitoring of Depth of AnesthesiaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Aligarh Muslim UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectIndia
-
University of ChicagoWithdrawnAnesthesia | Patient Satisfaction | Anesthesia Risks | Anesthesia Consent | Consent RetentionUnited States
Clinical Trials on 5mg bupivacaine
-
Helse Stavanger HFCompleted
-
Eisai Co., Ltd.Completed
-
University of EdinburghNHS LothianCompleted
-
Vigonvita Life SciencesCompletedErectile DysfunctionChina
-
Yuhan CorporationCompletedHypertension | HypercholesterolemiaKorea, Republic of
-
Dong-A ST Co., Ltd.CompletedThe Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and Safety/Tolerability of Evogliptin in Hemodialysis PatientsHemodialysis PatientsKorea, Republic of
-
vTv TherapeuticsTerminatedAlzheimer's DiseaseUnited States, Canada
-
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteMinistero della Salute, ItalyUnknownDilated Cardiomyopathy | Acute Heart FailureItaly
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityNot yet recruiting