Evaluation of the Effect of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Upper Extremity Spasticity After Stroke

January 28, 2025 updated by: Haydar Gok, Ankara University

Evaluation of the Effect of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation With Shearwave Ultrasound Elastography in Upper Extremity Spasticity After Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Spasticity is a frequent problem in post-stroke patients. It can negatively affect the functional recovery of patients and impair their quality of life. The repetitive pulsed magnetic stimulation (rPMS) treatment has been shown to cause a reduction in muscle tone and improvement in activities of daily living in stroke patients. So far, the effects of rPMS on muscle tone, which is the neurophysiological component of spasticity, have been evaluated, but its effects on the biomechanical component (soft tissue stiffness) have not been demonstrated. In this study, the effects of rPMS on soft tissue stiffness as well as increased muscle tone will be evaluated with clinical and ultrasound elastography in post-stroke patients with upper extremity spasticity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Pos-stroke patients who applied to the Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and developed upper extremity spasticity will be included in the study.

Patients included in the study will be randomized into two groups; treatment group and sham group. The block randomization will be preferred using the Random Allocation Software (RAS). 10 sessions of stretching exercises will be applied to all patients once a day, five sessions a week, with each session lasting 20 minutes. Patients in the treatment group will receive an additional peripheral magnetic stimulation therapy for the upper extremity arm/forearm spastic muscles on the hemiplegic side for a total of 10 sessions once a day, five sessions a week, for two weeks, each session lasting ten minutes. The patient will be seated in a chair. rPMS will not be given to the sham group, the device will not be operated, the probe of the device will be positioned in the same way as the patients in the treatment group for ten minutes, and the sounds recorded during the operation of the device will be heard by the patients. The patients and evaluators will not know which group the patients are in. rPMS treatment will be applied with the "BTL-6000 Super Inductive System Elite" in compliance with the recommendation by the manufacturer. The rPMS treatment parameters will be adjusted to use stimulus intensity above the motor threshold which is determined individually for each patient. Duration of each session will be 10 minutes.

Socio-demographic data such as gender, age, education level, occupation, background, duration of stroke, type of lesion, history of comorbidities and drugs used for spasticity including the botulinum toxin injection will be recorded. The patients will be evaluated three times; at the beginning, after the treatment (week 2) and two weeks after the end of the treatment.

Patients will be evaluated with the Fugl - Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Rating Scale, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Modified Tardieu Scale. Measurement of tissue stiffness will be made by shear wave elastography technique on the spastic upper extremity forearm/wrist flexor muscles of the affected side. Measurements will be made with the Siemens ACUSON S2000 Ultrasound System in kilopascals (kPa).

The Modified Ashworth Scale is considered the primary clinical measure of muscle spasticity. Hence it will be used as the primary outcome variable. Patients with severe spasticity (MAS stage 4) will not be included in the study. One unit decrease in MAS will be considered as clinically significant. Accordingly a power analysis yielded a sample size of 68 volunteers with 80% power and 5% margin of error. However, due to the nature of the study, it was planned to include a total of 76 volunteers, with an expected loss of 10%.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06340
        • Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Cebeci Hospital, Neurorehabilitation Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being diagnosed with stroke according to the definition of the World Health Organization (1989)
  • Being over 18 years old
  • Having a stroke confirmed by Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Patients with spasticity between grade 1 and 3 according to the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the upper extremity arm/forearm muscle
  • Wellness of the patient's general condition after stroke

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated with botulinum toxin, phenol, alcohol injection for spasticity in the last 6 months
  • Patients who have previously undergone antispastic surgery to the treatment area
  • Patients with a change in oral antispastic drug use in the last 6 months
  • Patients with fixed contractures in the elbow and wrist
  • Patients with signs of acute inflammation in the treatment area
  • Patients with bleeding diathesis
  • Patients with implanted devices (cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant, drug pumps)
  • Patients with vascular problems such as deep vein thrombosis, phlebitis, varicose veins, arterial disease
  • Patients with a history of cancer in the treatment area
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with metal implants in the treatment area
  • Patients with nonunion fractures at the treatment site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: therapeutic group
therapeutic repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
Patients in the treatment group will receive peripheral magnetic stimulation therapy for the upper extremity arm/forearm spastic muscles on the hemiplegic side for a total of ten sessions once a day, five sessions a week, for two weeks, each session lasting ten minutes. Ten sessions of stretching exercises will be applied to all patients once a day, five sessions a week, with each session lasting 20 minutes.
Sham Comparator: sham group
sham repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
rPMS will not be given to the sham group, the device will not be operated, the probe of the device will be positioned in the same way as the patients in the treatment group for ten minutes, and the sounds recorded during the operation of the device will be heard by the patients. Patients and evaluators will not know which group the patients are in. Ten sessions of stretching exercises will be applied to all patients once a day, five sessions a week, with each session lasting 20 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 4 weeks
The Modified Ashworth scale measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity. Scores range from 0 to 4, where lower values represent normal muscle tone and higher values represent spasticity: 0: No increase in muscle tone; 1: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension; 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM; 2: More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved; 3: Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult; 4: Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
Change from baseline at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl - Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Rating Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 4 weeks
The Fugl - Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Rating Scale is a measure of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. It consists of 30 items assessing motor function and 3 items assessing reflex function. The 33 items that constitute the scale are scored on an ordinal scale of 0 (absent), 1 (partial impairment), and 2 (no impairment), resulting in a range of possible scores from 0 to 66. Lower values represent severe motor impairment, higher values represent mild motor impairment. The difference between R2 and R1 will be the measure of the dynamic component of spasticity.
Change from baseline at 4 weeks
Modified Tardieu Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 4 weeks
The Modified Tardieu Scale is used clinically to measure spasticity in patients with neurological conditions. It is differentiated into 3 parts and measures the passive range of motion (described as R2) at a stretching velocity as slow as possible (described as VI); grades the quality of muscle reaction to passive stretch at the fastest stretching velocity (described as V3); and 3) measures the angle of muscle reaction at the point of resistance to the fastest stretching velocity when the overactive stretch reflex produces a first catch (angle of muscle reaction; described as R1). The quality of muscle reaction was then rated at the fastest stretching velocity, and scores range from 0 to 5; 0 is no resistance to passive ROM to 5 indicating joint is immobile. The difference between R2 and R1 will be the measure of the dynamic component of spasticity.
Change from baseline at 4 weeks
Ultrasound elastography
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 4 weeks
A method to measure tissue stiffness quantitatively.
Change from baseline at 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Haydar Gok, Professor, Ankara University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe