Serum-Protein-Based Indices for the Progression of Fracture Healing and Nonunion (UNION)

February 25, 2026 updated by: Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
To define a serum protein-based diagnostic for the progression and failure of fracture healing, through the identification of a set of serum proteins that appear at early times of biological healing and show a specific correlation with later radiological and functional signs used to define delayed healing and non-union.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Aim 1 Learning Set: At the earliest time in the study when 10 non-unions have been identified, we will select 10 control patients matched for comorbidities (including a body mass index>40, smoking history, and diabetes) from the group that has been enrolled for comparison to the 10 non-union patients. The proteins showing the most substantial changes in response to either their initial or end point measurements in both healer and non-healer sets will be identified. Temporal clustering and biological assessment tools will be used to identify the biological processes and time frames showing altered serum levels for these markers. A selection process will then use a set of pair wise iterative processes to identify both single markers and multiple marker subsets that show the best correlations to both mRUST and union/nonunion diagnosis prior to the current time that the diagnosis for failed healing is made.

Aim2 Validation Set: As soon as the next group 10 non-union patients are identified a new group of 10 healers will be selected and the target group of protein identified in phase one will be tested for robustness in a second study with this new set of non-healers healers. Assessments of the robustness will be based on level of detection (LOD) and reproducibility of LOD and diagnostic performance. A third assessment will be carried out with the total group of 20 non healers identified in both the first and second phases of the project by rescreening this group against profiles of a final and novel set of 40 new healers. This new set of healers will be selected from the total patient sets of profiles that have been collected across the entire study period and again will be randomly selected and matched for comorbidities. During each subsequent screen we will refine the marker set further taking into account both performance features, qualitative factors related to a protein's biological functions and relationships to the processes of healing, and their correlation to the clinical parameters that we are using to assess progression of healing (union). The last stage of assessment provides an independent technical biochemical/immunological validation for the ten best performing proteins. This assessment will be made using a conventional Western blot assay across a randomized set of 20 profiles from both healers and non-healers who had been previously screened using the microarray format. This last assay is a quality control step for protein identification specification.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Boston Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

We will consent and enroll up to 180 patients who meet the enrollment inclusion exclusion criteria for this study. In this group we anticipate based on our prior clinical data that about 20 patients would experience failed healing (nonunion) providing us with the ability to identify those protein in the serum that are diagnostic for failed healing. Patient enrollment will take place continuously over a three year period with the two stages of the project initiated when the enrollment numbers are met to carry out each aim of the project. When a patient presents with a humerus fracture he or she will be evaluated (according to standard of care) for possible enrollment in the study. The inclusion /exclusion criteria will be reviewed by the treating surgeon.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Skeletally mature, ages 18-70 (inclusive)
  2. Diagnosis of isolated closed extra-articular fractures of the humeral shaft deemed appropriate for closed treatment by immobilization and a sling by the treating physician
  3. Approached for consent within two weeks of injury
  4. Available for follow up at this treatment facility for at least six months

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Humeral shaft fractures that extend into the articular surface.
  2. Pathologic fractures.
  3. Additional long bone injuries or fractures of upper or lower extremity that would compromise outcome assessments of single fracture protein levels.
  4. Previous retained hardware in humerus from other injuries.
  5. Soft tissue injury compromising selected treatment method.
  6. Any injury that involved a trauma activation with entry of more than two AIS codes.
  7. Fractures with vascular injury.
  8. Pregnant women, potentially pregnant, or lactating women
  9. Immunocompromised based on the medical record and patient reported use of pharmacological medications that would lead to immunocompromise. (i.e., Anti-TNF therapies, or associated therapies for treatment of various rheumatological conditions.)
  10. Unable to comply with postoperative rehabilitation protocols or instructions (i.e., head injury or cognitively impaired).
  11. Known metabolic bone disease.
  12. Severe problems with maintaining follow-up (e.g., patients who are prisoners or homeless at the time of injury or who are intellectually challenged without adequate family support).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Observational group
Follow-up visits will be conducted at 4-6, 7-9, 12-16 and 26-32 weeks, from time of fracture. A participant's doctor will perform routine examination of fracture healing. The assessment will include evaluation of gross fracture site motion and presence or absence of radiographic healing, including a mRUST score.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fracture Healing Outcomes and Functional Healing Outcomes
Time Frame: 7-9 week visit
The primary outcome for the assessment of fracture healing will be assessed by gross motion and mRUST (modified radiograph union score) score greater than or equal to 6. mRUST score ranges from 4-16 where score greater than or equal to 6 is considered as the predictors of progression to union.
7-9 week visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient reported outcomes on physical function
Time Frame: 4 follow up time points: 4-6 weeks, 7-9 weeks, 12-16 weeks, and 22-32 weeks since the study injury.
Mesurements using the following PROMIS measures: physical function, and pain interference, and pain intensity
4 follow up time points: 4-6 weeks, 7-9 weeks, 12-16 weeks, and 22-32 weeks since the study injury.
Patient reported quality of life
Time Frame: 4 follow up time points: 4-6 weeks, 7-9 weeks, 12-16 weeks, and 22-32 weeks since the study injury.
It will be measured using VR-12.
4 follow up time points: 4-6 weeks, 7-9 weeks, 12-16 weeks, and 22-32 weeks since the study injury.
Clinical function outcome
Time Frame: 7-9 week visit
Radiographic measurements of alignment
7-9 week visit
Clinical function
Time Frame: 7-9 week visit
Range of motion testing
7-9 week visit
Protein levels
Time Frame: Sample collected at 4 follow up time points: 4-6 weeks, 7-9 weeks, 12-16 weeks, and 22-32 weeks since the study injury.
The analysis will include proteins with significant changes over time. The main analysis will focus on examining associations with protein clusters, using mean protein levels averaged over proteins within the same cluster. Secondary analysis will explore individual proteins separately or in clusters via multi-level modelling; however, the latter approach (multi-level modeling will be more of exploratory due to modelling complexity and large sample requirement.
Sample collected at 4 follow up time points: 4-6 weeks, 7-9 weeks, 12-16 weeks, and 22-32 weeks since the study injury.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Louis Gerstenfeld, PhD, Boston University
  • Principal Investigator: Renan C Castillo, PhD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Humerus Fractures

Subscribe