Randomised Study Between Intramedullary Locking Nails and Locking Plates for Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures (HUMERUS)

February 20, 2017 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Randomised Study Between Intramedullary Locking Nails and Locking Plates for Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Patients After 40-year-old

Primary purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes after displaced and proximal humerus fracture between nails and locked plates.

The hypothesis is that intramedullary nails provides satisfactory fixation and functional outcome compared to locked plate.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

: Proximal humerus fractures have a higher occurrence in elderly patients and therefore represent a public health problem.

Prognosis depends on greater and lesser tuberosity status, where rotator tendons of the shoulder have their insertion site.

Surgical treatment is recommended in case of tuberosities displacement. Goals are their anatomic reduction and stable primary fixation that will allow good bone healing and early mobilization. It has been demonstrated that an extended immobilization can result in stiffness by capsular retraction. On the contrary a too early mobilization can lead to secondary displacement of tuberosities and malunion.

These sequelae can be responsible for real disability when occuring in active patients, in particular when dominant limb is affected.

Internal fixation by locking intramedullary nails is currently the first choice technique because less invasive. However it doesn't always provide a good bone fixation, leading to tuberosities displacement or longer immobilization that decrease shoulder function prognosis. Locking plates represent a good alternative to avoid these complications by offering a better fixation of tuberosities in osteoporotic bone.

Though there is no existing randomised study comparing these techniques regarding functional outcomes, complications rates, and patient satisfaction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ile de France
      • Paris, Ile de France, France, 75018
        • Groupe Hospitalier Bichat - Claude Bernard 46, rue Henri-Huchard

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients between 40 and 85-years-old, who didn't expressed opposition to inclusion, with type III or IV displaced CEPHALOTUBEROSITY fracture( classification of Neer and DUPARC).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CEPHALOTUBEROSITY fractures type IV - CT4 will not be included because it can correspond to posterior or anterior fracture-dislocation of humeral head and therefore be associated to very high risk level of avascular necrosis . In this case a surgical treatment by arthroplasty is recommended.

Dislocated fracture Patient who express opposition to inclusion polytrauma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intramedullary nail
the fracture was reduced and fix by an intramedullary humeral nail (Multilock, SYNTHES, Switzerland) using an open surgery. An anterolateral approach will be performed, the patient sit in beach chair position under general anesthesia. If required additional sutures will be authorized to fix the tuberosities.
Other Names:
  • SURFIX, Integra
EXPERIMENTAL: Locked plate
the fracture was reduced and fix by a locking plate using an open surgery (SURFIX, Integra, France). A deltopectoral approach will be performed, the patient sit in beach position under general anesthesia. If required, additional sutures will be authorized to fix the tuberosities.
Other Names:
  • Multilock, SYNTHES

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant and MURLEY Score
Time Frame: 12 months
comparison of shoulder function outcome between 2 groups using Constant- Murley score after 12 months( mobility, function, pain and strength)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quick Dash, complication (mal union, necrosis, infection)
Time Frame: 6 and 18 months

comparison of Constant-Murley score after 6 and 18 months, comparison of complications rates and patients satisfaction( DASH and STT scores).

Those criteriae will be analysed on global groups and for each Neer and Duparc classification type fracture.

6 and 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patrick Boyer, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AOO269-32

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Proximal Humerus Fractures

Clinical Trials on Intramedullary nail

3
Subscribe