Intensive tDCS for MDD: Feasibility Study (tDCSintensif)

Intensive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Major Depression: Feasibility Study

This will be a prospective, open-label, single-arm study to determine the safety and feasibility of an intensive treatment of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for major depressive disorder (MDD). Participants will be age 18-65 with a diagnosis of unipolar MDD. Participants will receive an intensive treatment of tDCS over a 10-day treatment period and complete follow-up assessments at the end of treatment, 1, and 4 weeks post-treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This will be a prospective, open-label, single-arm study to determine the safety and feasibility of an intensive treatment of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for major depressive disorder (MDD). Secondary objective is to gather preliminary data on the clinical effects of the protocol. After assessment and inclusion into the study, participants will receive up to 50 tDCS sessions over 10 days.

Study procedures:

Daily assessments: brief questions before and after each tDCS session to evaluate potential adverse events as well as a verbal rating scale for pain.

Questionnaires : a battery of mood questionnaires will be completed to inform findings regarding clinical effects of the treatment.

Cognitive measures: a short cognitive assessment will be completed to inform findings regarding cognitive safety of the treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 3J4
        • Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Major unipolar depression for at least 4 weeks meeting the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5)
  • Age between 18 to 65
  • Minimum score of 17 on the GRID-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAMD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bipolar disorder,
  • Psychosis
  • Active substance use disorder (in the last 3 months)
  • Personality disorder
  • Neurocognitive disorder
  • High risk of suicide
  • Major comorbid medical or neurological condition
  • Pregnancy

Medical contraindications to tDCS:

  • Ferromagnetic material in the skull
  • Defect in the bone substance of the skull
  • Dermatological condition (e.g. eczema, psoriasis, urticaria, dermatitis, acne, hyperhidrosis, folliculitis, rosacea, keratosis, herpes, infectious or neoplastic phenomenon, etc.)
  • Skin lesion on the skull (ex: cuts, abrasions, rash, tattoos on the skull, piercings on the head, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active tDCS
Will be receiving active intensive tDCS treatment
tDCS alters brain excitability using a weak electric field induced through two electrodes and could potentially improve symptoms of depression

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depressive Symptoms Measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (1 week after end of treatment) and T2 (one month after the end of the treatment)

This outcome reflects the percentage change in depressive symptom severity as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a 9-item self-report scale assessing depressive symptoms over the past 2 weeks. Each item is scored from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day"), with a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. Percentage change from baseline (T0) was calculated at two follow-up timepoints:

  • T1 = 1 week after end of treatment (Day 17)
  • T2 = 1 month after end of treatment (Day 40) Percentage change was calculated using the formula: ((T_follow-up - T0) / T0) × 100. A negative value indicates improvement.
T0 (baseline), T1 (1 week after end of treatment) and T2 (one month after the end of the treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rate (> 50% improvement) and remission rate (score <7) using GRID-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAMD)
Time Frame: T1 (one week after end of the treatment) and T2 (one month after end of the treatment)
Response rate (> 50% improvement) and remission rate (score <7) using GRID-HAMD scale. (score 0-7= not depressed; very severe >23).
T1 (one week after end of the treatment) and T2 (one month after end of the treatment)
Percentage change on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-6)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline) and T2 (one month after the end of the treatment)
Percentage change on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-6)
T0 (baseline) and T2 (one month after the end of the treatment)
Percentage change on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline) and T2 (one month after the end of the treatment)
Percentage change on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
T0 (baseline) and T2 (one month after the end of the treatment)
Percentage change on General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline) and T2 (one month after the end of the treatment)
Percentage change on General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
T0 (baseline) and T2 (one month after the end of the treatment)
Percentage change on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Scale (RAVLT).
Time Frame: T0 (baseline) and T1 (one week after end of the treatment)
Cognitive safety. Percentage change on Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Scale. total learning. (Minimum score 0 and maximum score 75, higher score means better outcome)
T0 (baseline) and T1 (one week after end of the treatment)
Percentage change on Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline) and T1 (one week after end of the treatment)
Percentage change on Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF), total score immediate recall. (Minimum score 0 and maximum score 36, higher score means better outcome
T0 (baseline) and T1 (one week after end of the treatment)
Percentage change on Trail Making Test parts A&B
Time Frame: T0 (baseline) and T1 (one week after end of the treatment)
Percentage change on Trail Making Test. Total time needed for completion on part B. (no minimum and maximum time)
T0 (baseline) and T1 (one week after end of the treatment)
Percentage change on the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWAT)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline) and T1 (one week after end of the treatment)
Percentage change on the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWAT). (Minimum score: 0; Maximum score: no maximum; higher score means better outcome).
T0 (baseline) and T1 (one week after end of the treatment)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interim Analysis-GRID-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAMD)
Time Frame: After the first 10 patients are completed
Interim analysis to review response (GRID-HAMD) after 10 patients. Should there be significant concerns, the team will terminate the study. Ten was selected as it is close to previous reports and should be informative.
After the first 10 patients are completed

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Philippe Miron, MD, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 16, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 16, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-9546

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe