Pain Neuroscience Education Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

July 19, 2023 updated by: Caner Karartı, Hacettepe University

The Effects of Pain Neuroscience Education Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair on Clinical Outcomes

Pain neuroscience education (PNE) aims to explain to patients the biological and physiological processes involved in a pain experience and, more importantly, defocus the issues associated with the anatomical structures. It has been demonstrated for musculoskeletal pain, PNE provides compelling evidence in reducing pain, disability, pain catastrophization, and limited physical movement. Rotator cuff tears (RCT) often lead to pain aggrevation, deterioration of patients' functioning and considerable economic burden for health care resources requiring consultations, physiotherapy, radiological examinations and surgery. Despite costly arthroscopic surgeries and long-term physiotherapy treatments, satisfactory results are scarce. The lack of satisfactory results at the end of all this effort suggests that some practices should be revised. Although PNE is likely to have beneficial effects on shoulder pathomechanics, to our knowledge, there is no randomized controlled research in the relevant literature investigating the effects of PNE in patients with an RCT. The present study aims to examine the effectiveness of PNE on clinical outcomes in a sample of patients with RCT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Therapeutic interventions based on pain neuroscience education (PNE) have emerged as promising. It consists of educational sessions describing the neurobiology and neurophysiology of chronic pain and pain processing, with a particular focus on the role of the central nervous system on chronic pain and deemphasizing anatomical issues. PNE promotes the patients' understanding of chronic pain and changes maladaptive thoughts and cognitions (e.g. pain catastrophizing), which are important barriers to active therapy and exercise. Despite the apparent complexity of neuroscience education, patients are able to understand and remember it. Furthermore, there is evidence that an educational strategy addressing neurophysiology and neurobiology of pain can have a positive effect on pain, disability, catastrophizing, and physical performance, especially if combined with exercise. Rotator cuff tears (RCT) often lead to pain aggrevation, deterioration of patients' functioning and considerable economic burden for health care resources requiring consultations, physiotherapy, radiological examinations and surgery. Despite costly arthroscopic surgeries and long-term physiotherapy treatments, satisfactory results are scarce. The lack of satisfactory results at the end of all this effort suggests that some practices should be revised. Although PNE is likely to have beneficial effects on shoulder pathomechanics, to our knowledge, there is no randomized controlled research in the relevant literature investigating the effects of PNE in patients with an RCT. The present study aims to examine the effectiveness of PNE on clinical outcomes in a sample of patients with RCT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kırşehir, Turkey, 40100
        • Kırşehir Ahi Evran University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being in the age range of 18-65 years
  • being diagnosed with a small and medium-sized RCT based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical continuity tests
  • history of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR)
  • having a good command of the Turkish language
  • scoring above 24 in the Mini Mental State Test
  • ≥80% compliance in completing the post-ARCR Phase 1 trainings
  • volunteering to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diabetes mellitus
  • neurological problems
  • cervical disc herniation
  • visual, verbal, and/or cognitive defects (aphasia, unilateral neglect, etc.)
  • osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or other systemic inflammatory problems
  • hypermobility, trauma, and/or inflammation that could be a contraindication for mobilization
  • former shoulder fractures on the affected side
  • partial RCT
  • former surgery on the affected side
  • a history of adhesive capsulitis;
  • traumatic shoulder instability (subluxation-dislocation)
  • patients who are in stage 3 and above on the Goutallier classification system
  • receiving a corticosteroid injection on the affected side within 6 weeks prior to diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group
In addition to the conservative treatment, the experimental group will follow PNE sessions (one session per week over six consecutive weeks). Each session will take between 45 min and 1 h. The physiotherapist with 6 years of clinical and PNE experience will conduct all sessions. PNE will be conducted in line with international guidelines and covered the neurophysiology of pain, transition from acute to chronic pain, and the nervous system ability to modulate the pain experience. The theoretical information will be complemented with pictures and diagrams based on previous procedures. A booklet with the contents of each session and containing a mixture of text, figures, and activities to perform between sessions will be developed for the purpose of this study and given to participants. Time devoted to PNE will decrease from session 1 (60 min) to session 6 (15 min).
The experimental group will follow a PNE protocol based on previous procedure for a whole period of 6 weeks in addition the conventional treatment.
Active Comparator: Control Group
The control group will follow a conservative treatment. The 90-minute-long training sessions will be held 5 days per week. The training program will include the following exercises: cold-pack for 20 minutes; 20 minutes of Conventional TENS; 3 minutes of soft tissue massage for deltoid and biceps muscles; scapula and glenohumeral joint mobilizations; towel sliding and duster slide exercises on the wall; wand-assisted bilateral shoulder elevation; external rotation in increasing abduction angles, internal rotation in abduction, horizontal adduction and functional internal rotation exercises; strengthening exercises; finger ladder exercises; activation of deltoid, rotator cuff, and scapular muscles at chest level as the degree of active elevation increases; anterior elevation using an elastic band; strength training in "Full Can" position; closed kinetic chain trainings; isometric exercises of the periscapular muscles, deltoid and trapezius; and posterior capsule stretching.
Patients from both groups will receive a conventional 6-week treatment programme (30 treatment sessions, five a week, for 90min duration).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
VAS is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
6 weeks
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The SPADI is a 13 item self-reported questionnaire assessing pain and functional status. Each item is measured on a 0-10 scale and a 0-100 score calculated. Higher scores represent greater levels of pain and disability. The SPADI has been shown to have good test-re-test reliability and be sensitive to change.
6 weeks
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
DASH questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Catastrophizing
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) will be used to evaluate the patient's feelings, thoughts, and emotions related to cognitive characteristics of pain. It is a self-administered questionnaire with 13 items and 3 subscales: helplessness, magnification, and rumination. A 5-point scale is used for each item, with higher values representing greater catastrophizing. The scores for each item are added to determine the subscales, and the total score is calculated by the summation of all items. The PCS scores range from 0 to 52 points.
6 weeks
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
HADS will be used to assess anxiety and depression. HADS consists of 7 items for anxiety and 7 for depression. The items are scored on a 4-point scale from 0 (not present) to 3 (considerable).
6 weeks
Tampa-Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Participants will be assessed with Tampa-Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) in terms of presence of kinesiophobia. The TSK is a 17-item scale that measures the somatic focus of patients (beliefs about underlying and serious medical problems), and activity avoidance (beliefs about (re) injury or increased pain). The TSK has moderate construct, concurrent and predictive validity, good internal consistency, and a moderate to good retest reliability. Patients scoring high on the TSK, above 37 points, are likely to have fear of movement.
6 weeks
12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Participants will be assessed with 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) in terms of quality of life. It is a self-administered survey and two scores can be measured: the Physical Component and the Mental Component. In both, scores range from 0 to 100, with the highest scores associated with better levels of quality of life.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 12, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Injuries

Clinical Trials on Pain neuroscience education

Subscribe