Adaptation and Evaluation of the KEEP Model

August 28, 2025 updated by: Stacey Tiberio, Oregon Social Learning Center

Reaching Optimal Implementation and Mental Health Outcomes for Underserved and Rural Communities in Foster and Kinship Care: Adaptation and Evaluation of the KEEP Model

This study capitalizes on an opportunity to formally evaluate local adaptations of "Keeping Foster and Kinship Parents Supported and Trained" (KEEP), an evidence-based foster parent intervention, to reduce mental health disparities among child welfare-involved youth and improve care quality and long-term outcomes for Native, Hispanic/Latino, Black/African American, and sexual and gender minority youth. The knowledge gained from the study will impact all current and future large-scale implementations of KEEP and will bolster our scientific understanding the impact of KEEP on youth mental health outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study capitalizes on a contract with the Oregon Department of Human Services Child Welfare to implement KEEP state wide in Oregon with a focus on increasing access to services for minority youth populations. To help the child welfare system meet their goal of achieving health equity, adaptations to the KEEP curriculum have been made for minority groups, and KEEP is being delivered in "affinity groups". Affinity KEEP groups are tailored to meet a specific population's needs and are comprised of parents who all share a common interest, purpose, or key characteristic. To date, Affinity KEEP groups are being offered for foster/kin parents of populations defined by sexual and gender minority youth and Native youth, and for Spanish-speaking parents. The curriculum is currently being revised for transracial foster/kin placements where the youth and one or more parents are of a different race/ethnicity. The current proposal seeks to study N = 166 new families, as part of the ongoing Oregon KEEP implementation, and aggregate existing data from four KEEP studies to use propensity score matching to reduce selection bias and strengthen causal inferences that can be drawn from the potential benefits of providing KEEP to underserved minority populations. By leveraging two decades worth of data on the KEEP intervention and using state-of-the-art data harmonization techniques and a quasi-experimental design, this study affords a rigorous evaluation of whether tailoring the KEEP curriculum to minority populations' specific needs, and providing KEEP to foster/kin parents, improves youth mental health outcomes (i.e., depression/anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, suicidality, and externalizing behaviors) (Aim 1). The study could have a wide reach, impacting our understanding of how to improve and inform equitable delivery of services to youth and families involved in the child welfare system, and effectively address youth mental health disorders and improve care quality and long-term outcomes for a high-risk, underserved population of youth.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

283

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Oregon Social Learning Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Foster/resource parents who have been recruited to attend KEEP and have a focal youth for the intervention that:

  • is a dependent of Child Welfare Services in the state of Oregon
  • is between the ages of 4 and 21 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

Foster/resource parents who have been recruited to attend KEEP and have a focal youth for the intervention that:

  • is younger than 4 years of age.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Affinity KEEP

Affinity KEEP groups are tailored to meet a specific population's needs and are comprised of parents who all share a common interest, purpose, or key characteristic. The four types of Affinity KEEP groups for this study include:

  • foster/kin parents of sexual and gender minority youth
  • foster/kin parents of Native youth
  • transracial placements where the youth and one or more parents are of a different race/ethnicity
  • groups delivered in Spanish
The KEEP model focuses on optimizing the role of foster/kin parents as the agents of positive change for children and youth. Parent KEEP groups for children (ages 4-12) and KEEP-Safe groups for teens (ages 13-19) are delivered by two co-group leaders for 16 weeks. Sessions are 90 minutes each week. The same group of 8-10 foster/kin parents attends each week. Each KEEP group follows a manualized curriculum that emphasizes tailoring the content to the unique needs of the parents and youth in the group. The key parenting principles of the model include: (a) reinforce normative and prosocial behavior, (b) incentivize the behavior that parents want to promote, (c) build cooperation, (d) teach new behaviors, (e) use non-harsh effective limit setting, and (f) manage emotions while parenting.
Active Comparator: Non-Affinity KEEP
Parents attending a Non-Affinity KEEP group.
Non-Affinity KEEP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change in youth depression and anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months post-baseline
Psychometric scoring techniques will be used to harmonize items across multiple KEEP studies and instruments. Specifically, moderated nonlinear factor analysis will be utilized to estimate depression and anxiety symptoms factor scores that account for differential item functioning and impact across the set of study- and person-level covariates. Youth depression and anxiety symptoms will be measured via parent report using items from the Child Behavior Checklist and Parent Daily Report at baseline and 6-months post-baseline.
Baseline and 6-months post-baseline
Mean change in youth post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months post-baseline
Psychometric scoring techniques will be used to harmonize items across multiple KEEP studies and instruments. Specifically, moderated nonlinear factor analysis will be utilized to estimate PTSD symptoms factor scores that account for differential item functioning and impact across the set of study- and person-level covariates. Youth PTSD symptoms will be measured via parent report using items from the Child Behavior Checklist and Parent Daily Report at baseline and 6-months post-baseline.
Baseline and 6-months post-baseline
Mean change in youth self harming behaviors and suicidal ideation
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months post-baseline
Measured via parent report using the Child Behavior Checklist at baseline and 6-months post-baseline
Baseline and 6-months post-baseline
Mean change in youth externalizing behaviors
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-months post-baseline
Psychometric scoring techniques will be used to harmonize items across multiple KEEP studies and instruments. Specifically, moderated nonlinear factor analysis will be utilized to estimate externalizing behavior factor scores that account for differential item functioning and impact across the set of study- and person-level covariates. Youth externalizing behaviors will be measured via parent report using items from the Child Behavior Checklist and Parent Daily Report at baseline and 6-months post-baseline.
Baseline and 6-months post-baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rohanna Buchanan, PhD, Oregon Social Learning Center
  • Principal Investigator: Stacey Tiberio, PhD, Oregon Social Learning Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

These data will be archived with NIMH Data Archive.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe