Gluten Technology and Education for Celiac Health (GLUTECH)

June 8, 2026 updated by: Benjamin Lebwohl, Columbia University
The investigators propose to plan for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (M-RCT) to test the effectiveness of novel gluten detection technologies as an adjunct to telemedicine to manage celiac disease in newly diagnosed adults. If successful, the proposed intervention will improve mucosal recovery, promote a shift in current practice of celiac disease management toward long-term monitoring, and represent a significant step toward reducing the severe physical and psychological consequences of celiac disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed project addresses the need for a rigorous trial to test the effectiveness of novel gluten detection technologies as an adjunct to telemedicine to manage celiac disease in adults. Celiac disease affects about 1% of the United States (U.S.) population and seroprevalence has increased up to 5-fold in the U.S. since the 1950's, with diagnosis rates continuing to rise. Morbidity can be severe and includes anemia, infertility, osteoporosis, and malignancies, which can increase all-cause mortality. The only proven therapy is a strict gluten-free diet, the management of which can be extremely challenging and has been linked to diminished quality of life, including anxiety, depression, and fatigue. Despite the recommendation to see a dietitian regularly, many with celiac disease do not see one at all or have only a single session immediately post-diagnosis. The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the rapid adoption of telemedicine in gastroenterology and can facilitate communication between patient and dietitian by eliminating the need to arrange face-to-face meetings at celiac disease centers, which may be at great distance. Self-monitoring with new technologies for gluten detection in urine (e.g., gluten immunogenic peptide kits) can facilitate greater individual awareness of gluten exposures, are commercially available to the public, and have been shown to be valid and reliable. Physicians and dietitians are being asked if this technology should be used, and our preliminary studies have demonstrated acceptability and feasibility, but their impact on clinical outcomes such as mucosal recovery and symptoms has not been established. This U01 proposal is for a multi-center (New York, Massachusetts, Illinois, Tennessee) randomized controlled trial (M-RCT) to assess the effectiveness and document costs of gluten detection technologies as an adjunct to telemedicine on behavioral and clinical outcomes among newly diagnosed patients with celiac disease. Participants will be randomized to receive either 1) standard of care (i.e. a one-time in-person dietitian session plus telemedicine dietitian follow-up; or 2) standard of care + gluten detection technology. This would be the first large-scale clinical trial to test the effect of self-monitoring using gluten detection technology in the management of celiac disease. The primary outcome will be mucosal recovery 12-months post-randomization. Secondary outcomes include change in gastrointestinal symptoms, diet adherence, quality of life (including anxiety and depression), eating behaviors, intraepithelial lymphocyte counts on histology, and celiac disease serology, all assessed at baseline and again at 12-months post-randomization. If the primary endpoint of this proposed U01 is met, the intervention will improve mucosal recovery, promote a shift in current practice of celiac disease management toward long-term monitoring, and represent a significant step toward reducing the severe physical and psychological consequences of celiac disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Randi Wolf, PhD, MPH
  • Phone Number: 212-678-3912

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • Recruiting
        • University of Chicago Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Sonia Kupfer, MD
          • Phone Number: 773-834-1438
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Recruiting
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Jocelyn Silvester, MD, PhD
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Recruiting
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Recruiting
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Dawn Adams, MD
          • Phone Number: 615-936-0192

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any gender; Age 18-75 years
  • Celiac disease diagnosis by serology and duodenal biopsy (corresponding to •Marsh 3 histology), adequate sampling and interpretable villus height to crypt depth ratio upon review by our study pathologist
  • Diagnosed with celiac disease within 4 months of initial study screening
  • Willingness to use gluten-detection technology
  • Not currently using a gluten detection technology that tests for gluten in urine or stool

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study
  • Not planning to follow a gluten-free diet
  • Concurrent participation in a clinical trial of an experimental pharmacologic agent (for any condition).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Participants will be provided with continuous Telehealth dietitian follow-up
Regular follow-up with an expert dietitian
Experimental: Standard of Care Plus Technology
In addition to standard of care, participants will be provided with gluten detection technology so as to assist in navigating the gluten-free diet.
Regular follow-up with an expert dietitian
Portable technology to sense gluten after ingestion
Other Names:
  • Gluten Detect

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Small Intestinal Healing
Time Frame: 12 months
This will be measured with a measure in villus height to crypt depth ratio on small intestinal biopsy.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score on the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test (CDAT)
Time Frame: 12 months
Gastrointestinal symptoms will be measured using a validated instrument, the CDAT, which is used to assess adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD). The questionnaire consists of 7 items on a 5-point Likert scale, and the sum of the numeric values assigned to the answers provides a score ranging from 7 to 35 points, with a lower score indicating excellent GFD adherence (better outcome).
12 months
Score on the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary (CDSD)
Time Frame: 12 months
Celiac disease symptoms will be measured with a validated 5-item score measuring intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms. Each question is scored to calculate a composite score, which can range from 0 (min) to 20 (max), with 0 indicating least severe (better outcome) and 20 indicating most severe.
12 months
Score on the Celiac-Disease specific Quality of Life (CDQOL)
Time Frame: 12 months
CD-QOL is a self-administered questionnaire, which has 20 items across four clinically relevant subscales that are to be answered using a Likert scale. The overall score is expressed on a scale of 0-100, with a higher score suggesting a better quality of life and better outcome (a poor score is less than or equal to a score of 40, and a good overall score is greater than or equal to a score of 60).
12 months
Score on PROMIS 29+2
Time Frame: 12 months
The The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29+2 Profile v2.1 (PROPr) is used to calculate a preference score. Preference-based scores provide an overall summary of health-related quality of life on a common metric. Preference-based scores summarize multiple domains on a metric ranging from 0 (as bad as dead) to 1 (perfect or ideal health). The profile includes all items in the PROMIS-29 plus two Cognitive Function Abilities items. Scores are calculated using a table to translate the total raw score into a T-score for each participant. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Scores can range from 31 (min) to 155 (max), and a higher score indicates a better outcome.
12 months
Score on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: 12 months
Anxiety will be measured using the STAI, which is a psychological inventory consisting of 40 self-report items on a 4-point Likert scale. The STAI measures two types of anxiety - state anxiety and trait anxiety. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores correlating with greater anxiety (worse outcome).
12 months
Score on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for adults (CESD-R)
Time Frame: 12 months
Depression will be measured using a 20-item validated survey instrument, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-R). This scale is a self-report measure of depression. The questions measure 8 different subscales, including: sadness (dysphoria), loss of interest (anhedonia), appetite, sleep, thinking/concentration, guilt (worthlessness), tired (fatigue), movement (agitation), suicidal ideation. The response values for each question range from 0 (Not at all or less than one day) to 4 (Nearly every day for 2 weeks) The total score is calculated by finding the sum of 20 items. Scores range from 0-60 with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. A score equal to or above 16 indicates a person at risk for clinical depression.
12 months
Score on the CD-FAB
Time Frame: 12 months
Eating patterns and behaviors will be measured with the Celiac Disease Food Attitudes and Behaviors (CD-FAB). The CD-FAB is an 11-item self-reported, validated tool that investigates the eating attitudes and behaviors resulting from beliefs concerning cross-contamination, trust, risk-taking, and food safety. Items are based on a 7-point Likert scale and total scores range from 11 to 77, with a higher score suggesting more maladaptive eating attitudes and behaviors (worse outcome).
12 months
Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count (ILC)
Time Frame: 12 months
Intraepithelial lymphocyte count will be assessed using standardized procedures (duodenal biopsy). Using a length of surface epithelium of an entire villus and/or the villous tip in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded, Hematoxylin and Eosin-stained biopsies under the light microscope. The results are expressed as lymphocytes per 100 epithelial cells.
12 months
Tissue Transglutaminase IgA (TTG-IgA) Level
Time Frame: 12 months
Serum Tissue Transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (IgA) will be measured using standardized immunoassays.
12 months
DGP IgA/IgG Level
Time Frame: 12 months
Serum Deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) IgA/IgG will be measured using standardized immunoassays.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin Lebwohl, MD, MS, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AAAU4644
  • U01DK136523 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Following publication of the trial results, the steering committee may grant access to de-identified data to individuals upon request. This includes the statistical code, questionnaires, and technical processes. The corresponding author of the study will be responsible for conveying the request to the steering committee, communicating with the requestor, and facilitating the transfer of data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 1 year of trial publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Following publication of the trial results, the steering committee may grant access to de-identified data to individuals upon request. This includes the statistical code, questionnaires, and technical processes. The corresponding author of the study will be responsible for conveying the request to the steering committee, communicating with the requestor, and facilitating the transfer of data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe