Effect of Fixed Combination Citicoline Homotaurine and Pyrroloquinoline Quinone on Pattern-electroretinogram in Glaucoma
Effect of Fixed Combination Citicoline 500 mg, Homotaurine 50 mg, Pyrroloquinoline Quinone (Neuprozin Mito®) on Pattern Electroretinogram in Controlled Open Angle Glaucoma Patients:A Multicenter, Randomized, Single Blind, Cross-over Study
The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the effect of the fixed combination Citicoline 500 mg, Homotaurine 50 mg, Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) disodium salt (Neuprozin Mito®) on pattern electroretinogram (PERG) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma on well controlled intraocular pressure It will also learn about the safety of this fixed combination. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the fixed combination Citicoline 500 mg, Homotaurine 50 mg, Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) disodium salt (Neuprozin Mito®) improve PERG amplitude and/or latency? Does the fixed combination act as neuromodulator in glaucoma patients based on electrophysiology? Does the fixed combination improve quality of life of glaucoma patients? Does the fixed combination have any effect on optical coherence tomography (OCT)?
Researchers will compare the fixed combination Citicoline 500 mg, Homotaurine 50 mg, Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) disodium salt (Neuprozin Mito®) to citicoline 800 mg to see if the fixed combination works better than citicoline alone as neuroprotective agent in glaucoma.
Participants will:
Take the fixed combination or citicoline alone every day for 4 months After 4 months patients will be crossed over to the other treatment for 4 months.
Visit the clinic at enrollment and once every 4 months (at month 4 and at month 8) for checkups and tests (visual field, OCT, PERG and quality of life questionnaire)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Our general purpose is to evaluate the potential beneficial effects of supplementation of a fixed combination of Citicoline 500 mg plus Homotaurine 50 mg plus Pyrroloquinoline quinone on retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) function in subjects with glaucoma by pattern electroretinogram.
Primary objective To compare the effects of adding the fixed combination of Citicoline 500 mg plus Homotaurine 50 mg plus Pyrroloquinoline quinone (Neuprozin Mito® - NPM) a tablet a day on PERG examination (p50 wave) at four months of therapy, compared to citicoline 800 mg alone (Cebrolux® - CIT), as add-on to standard topical therapy.
Secondary objectives
To compare the two treatments (Neuprozin Mito® - NPM vs citicoline - CIT - alone) in terms of:
- visual acuity over time
- visual field changes over time, if any
- Quality of Life perception (National Eye Institute-Visual function questionnaire 25 item -NEI VFQ25 questionnaire) over time
optical coherence tomography - OCT- changes over time, if any
- Safety (Incidence of adverse events)
Study design and planning Multicentric, randomized, 2-sequence, 2-period, 2-treatment, crossover study, with blind outcome assessor.
Centers
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II ; UOC Oculistica, Napoli
- Clinica Oculistica dell'Università degli Studi di Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia.
- Dipartimento di Scienze Medico-Chirurgiche e Medicina Traslazionale, Università di Roma "Sapienza", Roma
Study duration Study duration ; 14 months Enrolment period: 6 months Minimum Follow-up: 8 months Total sample size: 40 patients
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Napoli, Italy, 80100
- Clinica Oculistica Università Federico II
-
-
PV
-
Pavia, PV, Italy, 27100
- Gemma Caterina Maria Rossi
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age > 18 years;
- diagnosis of primary OAG (POAG) from, at least, 3 years;
- visual acuity > 0.7 (7/10) decimals;
- refractive error < 5 Diopter (D) (spheric) and < 2D (toric);
- transparent diopter means (cornea and lens);
- controlled intraocular pressure (IOP) (<18 mmHg, morning value) with prostaglandin analogues as monotherapy;
- stable intraocular pressure - IOP < 18 mmHg in the last 2 years;
- stable and unchanged topical therapy in the last 6 months;
- at least two reliable visual fields (Humphrey 24-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-SITA Standard) per year in the last 2 years;
- early to moderate visual field defect (mean deviation, MD <12 dB);
- electrophysiological (pattern electroretinogram-PERG) parameters alterations similar to glaucomatous pathology;
- written consent to participate to study procedures and data utilization in an anonymous form
Exclusion Criteria:
- ocular hypertension with normal optic nerve and visual field; angle closure glaucoma; congenital glaucoma; secondary glaucoma; normal tension glaucoma;
- history of recurrent uveitis/scleritis/herpes infection;
- pregnancy and breastfeeding;
- contraindication to Citicoline and/or Homotaurine and/or pyrroloquinoline quinone -PQQ
- contraindication to prostaglandine analogues
- topical therapy with Brimonidine or beta-blockers as monotherapy or fixed combination
- topical therapy with pilocarpine and aceclidine, monotherapy or fixed combination
- systemic or topical treatment with another neuroprotective agent in the last 4 months prior to enrollment
- systemic betablockers
- systemic therapies affecting patients' performance in visual field examination (sedatives);
- glaucomatous scotomas within 10 degree from fixation
- any condition limiting the patient's ability to participate in the study;
- other ocular causes of visual field and PERG changes, such as cataract, myopic chorioretinopathy, macular diseases, retinal vascular occlusion, diabetic retinopathy;
- other systemic causes of visual field and PERG changes such as neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, acute lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis) or pituitary disorders;
- cerebral ischemia in the last 2 years
- any change in topical therapy in the 6 months prior to enrollment or during the study period
- concomitant participation to another clinical trial
- any previous filtering and/or retinal surgery;
- cataract surgery in the last 6 months;
- any previous laser treatment for glaucoma in the last 5 years
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Citicoline 500 mg+Homotaurine 50 mg+Pyrroloquinoline quinone (Neuprozin Mito®-NPM)
Citicoline 500 mg plus Homotaurine 50 mg plus Pyrroloquinoline quinone (Neuprozin Mito® - NPM) fixed combination for 4 months followed by Cebrolux -CIT for 4 months, besides standard topical treatment
|
treatment for 4 months and then cross over to the other therapy
|
|
Active Comparator: Cebrolux -CIT for 4 months
Citicoline 800 (Cebrolux-CIT) for 4 months followed by Citicoline 500 mg plus Homotaurine 50 mg plus Pyrroloquinoline quinone (Neuprozin Mito® - NPM) for 4 months, besides standard topical treatment
|
treatment for 4 months and then cross over to the other therapy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To compare the effects of adding the fixed combination of Citicoline 500 mg+Homotaurine 50 mg+Pyrroloquinoline quinone (Neuprozin Mito® - NPM) on PERG latencies
Time Frame: 4 months
|
latency of PERG waves (milliseconds)
|
4 months
|
|
To compare the effects of adding the fixed combination of Citicoline 500 mg+Homotaurine 50 mg+Pyrroloquinoline quinone (Neuprozin Mito® - NPM) on pattern-electroretinogram -PERG- amplitudes
Time Frame: 4 months
|
amplitude of PERG waves (microVolt)
|
4 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To compare the two treatments in terms of: • visual acuity over time
Time Frame: 4 months
|
visual acuity evaluation
|
4 months
|
|
To compare the two treatments in terms of: • visual field changes over time, if any
Time Frame: 4 months
|
Pattern Standard Deviation and Mean Deviation (deciBell)
|
4 months
|
|
To compare the two treatments in terms of: • optical coherence tomography - OCT changes over time, if any
Time Frame: 4 months
|
retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cells complex (GCC)
|
4 months
|
|
To compare the two treatments in terms of: • Safety (Incidence of adverse events)
Time Frame: 8 months
|
adverse events onset
|
8 months
|
|
To compare the two treatments in terms of: • Quality of Life perception national eye institute-visual function questionnaire 25 items (NEI VFQ25) over time
Time Frame: 4 months
|
quality of life with questionnaire national eye institute-visual function questionnaire 25 items (NEI-VFQ25) (from 0=worst score/quality of life to 100 better score/quality of life)
|
4 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ciro Costagliola, MD, Federico II University eye Clinic, Naples
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NP-MITO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.