Study of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Severe IBS Patients (ICEBOAT)

A Prospective, Multi-center, Double Blind Randomized Trial of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) Delivered by Capsule Versus Placebo in Severe Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

The objective of this protocol is to evaluate the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) using oral capsules containing frozen stools vs sham FMT on IBS severity score at 12 weeks in patients with severe irritable bowel syndrome refractory to conventional treatments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic disease. It affects about 4.4 to 10 % of the French general population (according to Rome III or Rome IV definition) and is the most frequent functional bowel disorder in patients visiting general practitioners or gastroenterologists. The efficacy of treatments is often limited, in particular form the case severe of IBS (IBS-SSS>300) which concerns at least 20 to 25% of patients and IBS can cause significant deterioration in quality of life.

In this context, microbiota could become a potential therapeutic target, and replacement of the abnormal fecal microbiota by an "healthy" one, especially in patients refractory to previous treatment and with severe symptoms, is a seducing new therapeutic strategy. The primary outcome is an improvement in the IBS-SSS score level at 12 weeks after taking a oral capsules of FMT in patients with severe IBS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years and < 75 years
  • IBS defined according to Rome IV definition (IBS-C, IBS-D or IBS-M)
  • Severe disease (IBS-SSS >300) and refractory to at least two previous treatment strategies:among the following : anti-spasmodic and/or laxatives (polyethylene glycol) or anti-diarrheal drug (loperamide) according to transit subtype for one month, antidepressants for 2 months, probiotics (ALFLOREX, SMEBIOCTA, PROBIOLOG FLORVIS) for 1 month, hypnosis for 5 hypnosis sessions in two months, Cognitive Behavioral Therapies for 2 months, colestyramine for IBS-D patients for 1 month, ondansetron for IBS-D patients and for 1 month, ebastine for 2 months, L-glutamine (5g x3/day, for 2 months, Gelsectan for one month, Biofeedback for 15 sessions in IBS-C (3 months), Low FODMAP diet for 1 month, gluten free diet for 1 month, standard dietary advice from the NICE (UK) for 1 month, increase in physical activity.
  • Patient with health insurance (AME excepted)
  • Informed written consent
  • For women with childbearing potential, efficient contraception for the duration of the participation to the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other chronic gastrointestinal disease (celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease)
  • participants if there is a reason to suspect an alternative diagnosis to the IBS complaints
  • Surgical intervention in the gastrointestinal region except for appendectomy, hernia repair, cholecystectomy and hemorroidectomy
  • Treatment preceding FMT with: antibiotics, antifungic or probiotics treatment < 4 weeks, or factors that may affect the composition of intestinal microbiota
  • Abuse of alcohol or drugs
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Participation in any other interventional study
  • Patients under legal protection.
  • Acute COVID-19 infection
  • Presence of systemic disease, immune deficiency or treatment with immune-modulators
  • Severe psychiatric disorder
  • Participants who were assessed as likely to be noncompliant (ie, not adhering to the tasks they were to perform as participants)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Administration of the sham (PLACEBO)
Oral, capsulized, frozen capsules without fecal matter but containing cryopreservation solution will be administered at the same volume and same time point as in the experimental group. Taken in one day in two separate meals. Administration of the sham after colon cleaning.
Oral, capsulized, frozen capsules without fecal matter but containing cryopreservation solution will be administered at the same volume and same time point as in the experimental group. Taken in one day in two separate meals. Administration of the sham after colon cleaning.
Experimental: Administration of fecal microbiota transplantation ( FMT capsules)
Oral, capsulized, frozen fecal microbiota transplantation FMT delivering approximatively 24 g of stools taken in one day in two separate meals. Administration of the FMT after colon cleaning.
Oral, capsulized, frozen fecal microbiota transplantation FMT delivering approximatively 24 g of stools taken in one day in two separate meals. Administration of the FMT after colon cleaning.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease in IBS severity at 12 weeks defined by the percentage of patients having at least a 75 points decrease in IBS-SSS.
Time Frame: At 12 weeks

To evaluate the efficacy of oral capsules containing frozen fecal microbiota (FMT) vs sham FMT on IBS severity score at 12 weeks in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with severe disease refractory to conventional treatments.

Decrease in IBS severity at 12 weeks is defined by the percentage of patients having at least a 75 points decrease in IBS-SSS.

At 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease in IBS severity at 12 weeks defined by the percentage of patients having at least a 50 points decrease in IBS-SSS.
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
To evaluate the efficacy of oral capsules containing frozen fecal microbiota (FMT) vs sham FMT on IBS severity score at 12 weeks in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with severe disease refractory to conventional treatments (at least a 50 points decrease in IBS-SSS)
At 12 weeks
FMT success
Time Frame: At 12 weeks
patient's microbiota 12 weeks after FMT closer to that of the donor than the patient's microbiota before FMT. The composition of the patient's fecal microbiota 12 weeks after FMT will be compared to the patient's microbiota before transplantation and to the donor using the Sorensen similarity index. The FMT will be considered as a success if the Sorensen index [patient after FMT vs donor] > Sorensen index [patient after FMT vs patient before FMT] and if the Sorensen index [patient after FMT vs donor] ≥ 0,6. The composition of fecal microbiota will be measured by pyrosequencing (16S RNA).
At 12 weeks
Intestinal microbiota composition at week 12 and 24 by 16s sequencing.
Time Frame: at week 12 and 24

Intestinal microbiota composition and diversity at week 12 and 24 assessed by 16s sequencing. Microbiota composition and diversity assessed by 16s sequencing at week 12 and 24, compared to baseline and to healthy volunteers donor's microbiota. Microbiota composition will be assessed using Qiime pipeline and analyzed at all phylogenetic levels.

Diversity will be evaluated using Shannon index, Simpson index, Chao1 index and number of observed species.

at week 12 and 24
Efficacy (decrease in IBS severity >75 points) at week 24 according to FMT success.
Time Frame: At 24 weeks
Efficacy (decrease in IBS severity >75 points) according to FMT success.
At 24 weeks
EMA Endpoint at week 12 and 24 defined as a patient who fulfils the response criteria (simultaneous improvement of transit and abdominal pain) displayed in the following for at least 50% of the observation time.
Time Frame: at week 12 and 24
Efficacy according to EMA (European Medical Agency) endpoint in IBS on composite criteria at 12 or 24 weeks
at week 12 and 24
Percentage of responders in the different subgroups IBS-D, IBS-C and IBS-M using the primary endpoint at week 12 and 24.
Time Frame: at week 12 and 24
IBS severity at 12 weeks by donors (one donor giving FMT to several patients)
at week 12 and 24
Mean IBS-SSS (IBS severity), comparison between FMT and placebo at 12 and 24 weeks)
Time Frame: at week 12 and 24

IBS severity at 12 weeks and at 24 weeks by IBS subtypes according to transit pattern.

The score ranges from 0 to 500 ( Remission : 0 to 74, Mild : 75 to 175, Moderate : 175 to 300 and Severe : >300).

at week 12 and 24
Mean IBS-QoL score (IBS Quality of life) comparison between FMT and placebo at 12 and 24 weeks (Drossman et al. 2000)
Time Frame: at week 12 and 24
IBS Quality of life at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. Irritable Bowel Syndrom- Quality of Life (IBS-QoL) at 12 weeks and 24 weeks, IBS-QoL ranges from 0 ( worse) to 100 (better).
at week 12 and 24
Patient's perception of FMT : - Questionnaire for correct assessment of FMT or placebo and FMT acceptability) at V2 (FMT administration). - Questionnaire for assessment of FMT secondary effects at V3.
Time Frame: V2: five weeks after inclusion. V3:Four weeks after V2
Patient's perception of FMT (questionnaire for correct assessment of FMT or placebo and FMT acceptability) (Annex D), secondary effects of FMT
V2: five weeks after inclusion. V3:Four weeks after V2
Safety (Serious Adverse Events, Adverse Events) compared between groups.
Time Frame: through study completion, at 24 months
Safety (Serious Adverse Events, Adverse Events) compared between groups.
through study completion, at 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jean Marc SABATE, Pr, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Administration of the sham (PLACEBO)

Subscribe