- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06526078
Cognitive Training as an Adjunct to Ketamine in Real-world Clinics
August 18, 2026 updated by: Rebecca Price, University of Pittsburgh
A Brief Automated Neurocognitive Training to Enhance the Real-World Impact of Ketamine's Rapid Antidepressant Effect
In a sample of patients already receiving ketamine (or esketamine) treatment as part of their clinical care, this project seeks to test whether we can enhance and/or extend (es)ketamine's rapid effects by introducing helpful information delivered by a computer-based cognitive training protocol.
This work could ultimately lead to the ability to treat depression more efficiently and with broader dissemination by rapidly priming the brain for helpful forms of learning.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
600
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Rebecca B Price, PhD
- Phone Number: 412-383-2150
- Email: ketclinics@pitt.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Iya Cooper, B.S.
- Phone Number: 240-242-7318
- Email: ketclinics@pitt.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Oakland, California, United States, 94612
- Not yet recruiting
- Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, a division of Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Andrew Avins, MD
-
Contact:
- Steven Hamilton, MD
- Email: Steven.P.Hamilton@kp.org
-
Contact:
- Gabby Sanchez
- Email: Gabriela.X.Sanchez@kp.org
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- Recruiting
- University of Illinois at Chicago
-
Contact:
- Alex Leow, MD
- Email: alexfeuillet@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Sarah Kabir
- Email: skabir4@uic.edu
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Recruiting
- Baylor College of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Sanjay Mathew, MD
- Email: sjmathew@bcm.edu
-
Contact:
- Julia Engelhardt
- Email: julia.engelhardt@bcm.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- be between the ages of 18 and 80 years
- score ≥20 on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
- per SCID-5-RV interview, meet DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for at least one of the following: Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder (I or II), Persistent Depressive Disorder, or Other Specified Depressive or Bipolar Disorder
- exhibit treatment resistance, defined as: (a) failure to respond to ≥1 adequate trials of an evidence-based treatment for mood disorder [per the Antidepressant Treatment History Form-Short Form Modified Score Sheet (ATHF-SF-Modified)] and/or (b) failure to respond to ≥1 adequate mood stabilizer or other evidence-based treatment trials (for bipolar depression patients) and/or (c) a history of intolerance during attempted trials of evidence-based treatments for mood disorders and/or (d) failure to respond to ≥1 prior treatment trials (e.g., medication, psychotherapy) for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
- be eligible and clinically enrolled for an upcoming ketamine or esketamine induction series at one of our study clinics according to that clinic's standard intake procedures
- agree to maintain a stable schedule of concomitant psychiatric medications throughout the ketamine induction phase (minor adjustments to PRN meds and timing of meds are allowable), and for 4 weeks post-induction phase
- possess a level of judgment and understanding sufficient to agree to all procedures required by the protocol and must sign an informed consent document
- be willing and able to provide names and contact information for at least 1 additional emergency contact in the patient's proximal geographic area (in addition to the ketamine treatment team at the enrolling site)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of current/acute psychosis, mania, or dementia, or a diagnosis of developmental disorder with significant language and/or intellectual impairment (e.g., autism spectrum disorder)
- Current/acute suicide risk with intent to act, defined as CSSRS past-week ideation score ≥ 4 among outpatients; patients engaged in residential or inpatient care at the time of enrollment need not meet this CSSRS score criterion, as their current/acute suicide risk is extremely low by virtue of the residential/inpatient, round-the-clock care they are already receiving at time of enrollment
- Concern for dementia or significant cognitive decline, per interviewer observations and impressions during screening assessments
- Current pregnancy
- English reading level <5th grade as per patient self-report Rationale: to ensure adequate reading comprehension for verbal ASAT/sham stimuli which are presented in English
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cognitive Training
Web-based cognitive training
|
Sessions of cognitive training exercises (15-20min each) self-administered via a web app
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham Training
Web-based sham training
|
Sessions of sham training exercises (15-20min each) self-administered via a web app
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale: During (Es)Ketamine Induction
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through end of 'induction phase' treatments (up to max of 12 weeks)
|
depression severity; range 0-60; high score=worse outcome
|
Trajectories from baseline through end of 'induction phase' treatments (up to max of 12 weeks)
|
|
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale: After (Es)Ketamine Induction
Time Frame: Trajectories from final 'induction phase' treatment through 4 weeks post-induction
|
depression severity; range 0-60; high score=worse outcome
|
Trajectories from final 'induction phase' treatment through 4 weeks post-induction
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Self-reported depression (range: 0-27; higher scores = worse outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
PROMIS Measures-depression
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure: Self-reported depression T-score range: 0-100 (higher score = worse outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
Beck Hopelessness Scale
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
self reported to measure key aspects of hopelessness; range = 0-20, higher score=worse outcome
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
PROMIS Measures-anxiety
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure: Self-reported anxiety T-score range: 0-100 (higher score = worse outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
PROMIS Measures-anger
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure: Self-reported anger T-score range: 0-100 (higher score = worse outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
PROMIS Measures-Positive Affect
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure: Self-reported positive affect/well-being T-score range: 0-100 (higher score = better outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
PROMIS Measures-Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure: Self-reported sleep disturbance T-score range: 0-100 (higher score = worse outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
PROMIS Measures-Cognitive Function
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure: Self-reported cognitive function T-score range: 0-100 (higher score = better outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
Cognitive Triad Inventory
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Negative perceptions of self, future, & world (range=36-252; higher score = better outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale: Naturalistic Follow-up
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
depression severity; range 0-60; high score=worse outcome
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale--Intensity of Most Severe Ideation
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
suicidal ideation/thoughts; range 0-5; high score=worse outcome
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
Patient Health Care Utilization Survey (PHCUS)
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
interview measure of psychiatric and healthcare service utilization
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
PROMIS Measures-substance Use
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure: Self-reported substance use Raw score range: 0-35 (higher score = worse outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
PROMIS Measures-alcohol
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure: Self-reported alcohol use T-score range: 0-100 (higher score = worse outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: Baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Self-report measure of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs)
|
Baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
Qualitative interviews assessing implementation
Time Frame: 12 months post-induction
|
Custom qualitative interviews with qualitative coding
|
12 months post-induction
|
|
PROMIS Measures-Social Functioning
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures of social functioning: T-score range: 0-100 (higher score = better outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
PROMIS Measures-Pain
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures of pain: T-score range: 0-100 (higher score = better outcome)
|
Trajectories from baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
Implicit Association Test across follow-up
Time Frame: Trajectories through 12 months post-induction
|
performance-based "target engagement" measure of implicit self-esteem; range = -inf-inf; high score=worse outcome
|
Trajectories through 12 months post-induction
|
|
Time to relapse
Time Frame: Baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Time-to-event for relapse to within 25% of baseline MADRS score
|
Baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
|
Implicit Association Test
Time Frame: Trajectories from baseline through 4 weeks post-induction
|
performance-based "target engagement" measure of implicit self-esteem; range = -inf-inf; high score=worse outcome
|
Trajectories from baseline through 4 weeks post-induction
|
|
Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility
Time Frame: Post-Induction Week 1 assessment (approximately 1-7 days post induction)
|
self-report scales of intervention acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility; range = 5-20; high score=better rating
|
Post-Induction Week 1 assessment (approximately 1-7 days post induction)
|
|
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time Frame: Post-Induction Week 1 assessment (approximately 1-7 days post induction)
|
Self-reported satisfaction; range: 8-32; high score=better rating
|
Post-Induction Week 1 assessment (approximately 1-7 days post induction)
|
|
mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ)
Time Frame: Post-Induction Week 1 assessment (approximately 1-7 days post induction)
|
Self-reported usability of cognitive training web app; range = 18-126; high score=better rating
|
Post-Induction Week 1 assessment (approximately 1-7 days post induction)
|
|
Compliance with prescribed cognitive training sessions
Time Frame: Throughout the entirety of three discrete CT "bursts"
|
Compliance data from web app logs
|
Throughout the entirety of three discrete CT "bursts"
|
|
Awe Experience Scale (AWE-S)
Time Frame: 1 week after first induction treatment
|
self-report measure of awe-inspiring experiences (range: 30-210; higher score=greater awe)
|
1 week after first induction treatment
|
|
Time to first maintenance treatment
Time Frame: Baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Time-to-event for the date of return to clinic for first maintenance treatment
|
Baseline through 12 months post-induction
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rebecca B Price, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 12, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2029
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 24, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
July 29, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 19, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 18, 2026
Last Verified
August 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY23110120
- R01MH136179 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- R01MH136178 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Individual participant data that underlie the results will be shared with other researchers via the NIMH Data Archive (NDA) data repository.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will become available one year after study completion and will be available indefinitely.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
NDA access required.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.