- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06551311
The Effects of Eccentric Cycling Exercise Program in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients
To Explore Efficacy and Load of Eccentric Cycling Training in Older CKD Patients with or Without Sarcopenia
Progress in medical technology, enhancements in environmental cleanliness, and elevated living conditions have notably prolonged the mean life expectancy, resulting in a swift increase in the aging population. The prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is more pronounced among the elderly in contrast to younger demographics. With the aging of the CKD population, the capacity to autonomously handle daily activities becomes a critical concern. This demographic frequently encounters concurrent health conditions, a decrease in self-care capabilities, general health decline, and diminished quality of life.
Recent studies suggest that physical activity has the potential to enhance cardiovascular health, cardiopulmonary endurance, muscle strength, quality of life, uremic toxin management, and inflammation levels among individuals with CKD. Given that CKD patients often exhibit sedentary behavior and reduced exercise capacity, eccentric cycling exercises may be particularly well-suited for this demographic.
Compared to concentric contractions, eccentric contractions subject the muscles to higher tension. Since muscle growth partially depends on the "stress exerted on muscle fibers"-meaning the greater the stress, the more stimulation the muscles receive-training focused on eccentric contractions could provide more stimulation and promote greater muscle growth.
In recent studies, eccentric cycling has emerged as a feasible and promising aerobic exercise intervention. It can provide a safe and appropriate amount of exercise while relatively reducing joint pressure. This novel combined aerobic and anaerobic exercise method is particularly beneficial for individuals with weaker lower limb muscles, lower joint pressure tolerance, poor metabolic and cardiovascular function, and a tendency to fatigue.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Kun-Ling Tsai, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 886-6-2353535 Ext. 6219
- Email: kunlingtsai@mail.ncku.edu.tw
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tainan, Taiwan, 701
- Recruiting
- National Cheng Kung University Hostipal
-
Contact:
- Kun-Ling Tsai, PhD
- Phone Number: 6219 062353535
- Email: kunlingtsai@mail.ncku.edu.tw
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
This study will be conducted in collaboration with the Departments of Nephrology and Geriatric Medicine at National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Taiwan. Participants will be recruited as voluntary subjects from outpatient clinics. The attending physician will assess eligible patients. After the study's purpose and methodology are explained by the research staff and patients consent to participate, block randomization will be used to assign participants into one of three groups randomly. The allocation results will be securely stored by the principal investigator.
Inclusion Criteria:
- (1) Clinical diagnosis of CKD
- (2) eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m^2 or undergoing routine dialysis
- (3) Must be able to communicate normally, understand and comply with instructions.
- (4) Must be able to walk independently.
Exclusion Criteria:
- (1) Clinical diagnosis of acute renal failure
- (2) Hospitalization for acute illness within the past three months
- (3) Clinical diagnosis of severe joint disease and lower extremity surgery
- (4) Clinical diagnosis of severe neurological disease
- (5) Clinical diagnosis of severe cardiovascular disease
- (6) Unconsciousness or lack of ability to cooperate with the assessment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control group
Receive regular health care
|
|
|
Experimental: The concentric cycling exercise training group
Over eight weeks, participants completed 24 exercise sessions, three times per week, with each session lasting between 20 and 30 minutes under concentric cycling exercise training.
|
Participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: control (CTL), concentric cycling training (CON), or eccentric cycling training (ECC). CTL: Received standard health education guidance. CON and ECC: Participants in both the CON and ECC groups engaged in 24 exercise sessions, performed three times per week, lasting between 20 and 30 minutes. Both groups trained on a stationary bicycle, with the CON group performing concentric cycling and the ECC group performing eccentric cycling. The exercise intensity for both groups was set to a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) level of 13. Sessions began at 20 minutes and increased incrementally by 3-5 minutes each week until participants could sustain a 30-minute duration. The initial exercise intensity was set at 50% of the maximal output determined by a cardiopulmonary exercise test, and it was progressively increased by 5-10% of the estimated target power weekly, with adjustments made primarily to maintain an RPE of 13. |
|
Experimental: The eccentric cycling exercise training group
Over eight weeks, participants completed 24 exercise sessions, three times per week, with each session lasting between 20 and 30 minutes under eccentric cycling exercise training.
|
Participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: control (CTL), concentric cycling training (CON), or eccentric cycling training (ECC). CTL: Received standard health education guidance. CON and ECC: Participants in both the CON and ECC groups engaged in 24 exercise sessions, performed three times per week, lasting between 20 and 30 minutes. Both groups trained on a stationary bicycle, with the CON group performing concentric cycling and the ECC group performing eccentric cycling. The exercise intensity for both groups was set to a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) level of 13. Sessions began at 20 minutes and increased incrementally by 3-5 minutes each week until participants could sustain a 30-minute duration. The initial exercise intensity was set at 50% of the maximal output determined by a cardiopulmonary exercise test, and it was progressively increased by 5-10% of the estimated target power weekly, with adjustments made primarily to maintain an RPE of 13. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET)
Time Frame: at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
CPET evaluates both submaximal and peak exercise responses of the pulmonary, cardiovascular, hematopoietic, neuropsychological, and skeletal muscle systems for diagnostic and prognostic assessment.
It aims to assess exercise performance, functional capacity, and impairment by identifying undiagnosed exercise intolerance and symptoms.
|
at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Pulmonary function test
Time Frame: at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
Spirometry is a physiological test that measures the ability to inhale and exhale air over time.
The main spirometry results are forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), and the FEV1/FVC ratio.
|
at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Maximum respiratory pressure (MIP/MEP)
Time Frame: at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) measurements help evaluate respiratory muscle weakness.
|
at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
The American Thoracic Society developed the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) to assess patients with cardiopulmonary issues and has since been used for various other conditions.
It is a low-intensity, submaximal exercise test that measures aerobic capacity, endurance, and oxygen saturation.
|
at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Lower limb strength-Knee Extension Strength Test
Time Frame: at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
The Knee Extension Strength Test is a clinical assessment used to measure the maximal force production of the quadriceps muscles in both legs (bilateral lower limb strength).
It's a valuable tool for identifying muscle weakness, tracking progress after injury or rehabilitation, and guiding treatment decisions.
|
at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Physical fitness-Body composition
Time Frame: at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
Body composition is a key component for maintaining good general. Body composition refers to the distribution of fat, muscle, bone, and other tissues that make up your body. It is often expressed as the percentage of total body weight that consists of fat and/or lean body mass. Body composition offers numerous insights into health, fitness, and nutritional status. Utilize Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) equipment to assess a range of body composition parameters, including high (m^2), weight (kg), body fat (%), Skeletal muscle rate (%), basal metabolic rate, and BMI (kg/m^2). |
at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Physical fitness-Flexibility
Time Frame: at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
Flexibility, the ability to move joints through their full range of motion, is key for physical health.
Upper limb test: Apley scratch test assess shoulder flexibility, helping gauge overall mobility.
|
at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Physical fitness-muscle strength
Time Frame: at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
Muscle strength is characterized as the maximum force that a muscle or a group of muscles can produce at a specific or predetermined velocity. In essence, it refers to the capacity of skeletal muscle to generate force, which is crucial for ensuring stability and mobility within the musculoskeletal system. Upper arm testing-hand grip test: The purpose of the handgrip strength test is to measure the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. The subject holds the dynamometer in the hand to be tested, with the arm at right angles and the elbow by the side of the body. The handle of the dynamometer is adjusted if required - the base should rest on the first metacarpal (heel of palm), while the handle should rest on middle of the four fingers. When ready the subject squeezes the dynamometer with maximum isometric effort, which is maintained for about 5 seconds. No other body movement is allowed. The subject should be strongly encouraged to give a maximum effort. Lower |
at Baseline, midterm test (at 4 weeks), post-test (at 8 weeks), and follow-up test (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Quality of life indicators-SF-36 Questionnaire
Time Frame: at Baseline and follow up test (at 12 weeks)
|
SF-36 is a very popular instrument for evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life. The SF-36 measures eight scales: physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). the score is in two steps. Precoded numerical values are first recorded by the scoring key in eight scales. Each item is rated, and a higher number indicates that the subject is in better overall health. Also, each item is graded on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 and 100 as the lowest and highest possible scores. The eight scale scores are produced in step 2 by averaging the items on the same scale. There are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS). All scales contribute in different proportions to the scoring of both PCS and MCS measures. |
at Baseline and follow up test (at 12 weeks)
|
|
Quality of life indicators- KDQOL Questionnaire
Time Frame: at Baseline and follow up test (at 12 weeks)
|
Health-related quality of life is a crucial outcome for the chronic kidney disease population, the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL) questionnaire is commonly used as an integral part of clinical evaluations. The KDQOL-36™ is a short form that includes the SF-12 as generic core plus the burden of kidney disease, symptoms/problems of kidney disease, and effects of kidney disease scales from the KDQOL-SF™v1.3. Items 1-12: SF-12 Items 13-16: Burden of kidney disease Items 17-28: Symptoms/problems Items 29-36: Effects of kidney disease |
at Baseline and follow up test (at 12 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- A-BR-110-109
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Disease
-
3-C Institute for Social DevelopmentUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedChronic Kidney Diseases | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage4 | Pediatric Kidney Disease | Chronic Kidney Disease stage3 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage V | Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage IV (Severe) | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 2 | Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage IUnited States
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaRecruitingChronic Kidney Diseases | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage4 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage3 | Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic DialysisMalaysia
-
National Taiwan University HospitalCompletedChronic Kidney Disease stage4 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage3 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 2 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1Taiwan
-
Centre Hospitalier le MansLe Mans UniversiteRecruitingFatigue | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage4 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3BFrance
-
Centre Hospitalier le MansLe Mans UniversiteWithdrawnFatigue | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 | Chronic Kidney Disease stage3 | Chronic Kidney Failure | Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 4 (Severe)
-
American Academy of Family PhysiciansUniversity of Colorado, Denver; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive... and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Kidney Disease | Chronic Renal Insufficiency | Chronic Kidney Insufficiency | Chronic Renal Diseases | Kidney Insufficiency, ChronicUnited States
-
Lund UniversityBaxter Healthcare Corporation; Universidad de CórdobaCompletedEnd Stage Kidney Disease | Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic DialysisArgentina
-
Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc de LyonNot yet recruitingKidney Failure, Chronic | Diet Habit | Chronic Kidney Disease stage3 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B | Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3 (Moderate) | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3A (Disorder)France
-
A.C. AbrahamsCompletedEnd Stage Renal Disease | Chronic Kidney Disease | End Stage Kidney Disease | Chronic Kidney FailureNetherlands
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalActive, not recruitingMetabolic Syndrome | Chronic Disease | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 2 | Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1Taiwan
Clinical Trials on cycling training exercise
-
University Medical Centre LjubljanaSlovenian Research AgencyUnknownKidney Diseases | Chronic Kidney Diseases | Physical Activity | End Stage Renal Disease | Kidney FailureSlovenia
-
Poznan University of Physical EducationPoznan University of Medical SciencesCompletedHypertension | Obesity | Dyslipidemias | Type 2 Diabetes | Endothelial DysfunctionPoland
-
Nanjing Mingzhou Rehabilitation HospitalGuilin institute of information technologyRecruitingPatellofemoral Pain SyndromeChina
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalRecruitingEccentric Exercise TrainingTaiwan
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompletedEccentric Exercise TrainingTaiwan
-
University of SydneyCompleted
-
Université Catholique de LouvainCompleted
-
Bispebjerg HospitalNot yet recruitingSarcopenia | Treatment Adherence and Compliance | Hospital Acquired Condition | Inactivity, PhysicalDenmark
-
Chung Shan Medical UniversityCompleted
-
KU LeuvenUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenRecruitingCritical Illness | Intensive Care Unit Acquired WeaknessBelgium