Effectiveness of Audiovisual Versus Written Postoperative Instructions for Patients Undergoing Minor Hand Procedures

Effectiveness of Audiovisual Versus Written Postoperative Instructions for Patients Undergoing Minor Hand Procedures: a Prospective Controlled Trial

The utility and effectiveness of video-based instructions (VBI) versus standard written instructions was not previously investigated in hand surgery; thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of audiovisual instruction as compared to regular verbal instructions given to patients undergoing common hand procedures, including instruction recall and compliance, patient education, patient satisfaction with the information given, patient satisfaction with operative experience.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Outcomes of hand surgery are greatly dependent on factors outside the operating theater as well. These include patient compliance to preoperative instructions that consist of proper surgical site care, proper positioning, and following occupational therapy protocols. Previous studies have shown that video-based information provide greater patient satisfaction than verbal instructions. Visual information was also reported to decrease patient anxiety regarding the procedure and increases patient education in terms of procedure risks and benefits(1-5). The utility and effectiveness of video-based instructions (VBI) versus standard written instructions was not previously investigated in hand surgery; thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of audiovisual instruction as compared to regular verbal instructions given to patients undergoing common hand procedures, including instruction recall and compliance, patient education, patient satisfaction with the information given, patient satisfaction with operative experience. The secondary objective is to evaluate if VBI result in better outcomes than standard written instructions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Please ensure that ALL items below are satisfied to be included in the study.

  • Patient undergoing hand and/or upper extremity surgery with Dr. Thibaudeau
  • Patient ≥ 18 years old
  • Patient who comprehends instructions provided in English and/or French
  • Patient who can navigate the internet to complete an online post-operative questionnaire

Exclusion Criteria:

Please ensure that NONE of the following items are selected to be included in the study.

  • Patient presenting with intra-articular, open, or pathological fractures
  • Patient presenting with associated tendon or nerve injuries
  • Patient receiving definitive surgery ≥21 days after injury
  • Patient with previous surgeries/deformity in the hand
  • Patient with pre-existing severe joint disease (rheumatoid arthritis, finger joint stiffness, or non-union)
  • Patient with medical contraindications to surgery
  • Patient who is unable to comply with rehabilitation
  • Patient who is unwilling to be followed up
  • Patient with dementia
  • Patient with significant mental illness
  • Patient who is unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction with the operative experience
Time Frame: within 1 week
Questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with the operative experience will be distributed within a week in post operative visit
within 1 week
patient instruction recall
Time Frame: within 1 week
Questionnaire to assess patient instruction recall will be distributed within a week in post operative visit. It consists of 9 questions, the maximum score is 9 and indicates excellent recall.
within 1 week
patient satisfaction with the information given
Time Frame: within 1 week

Questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with the information givenwill be distributed within a week in post operative visit

Overall, are you satisfied with the provided post-operative instructions for your hand surgery? Likert-scale 1-10 (with smile face) Overall, were the provided post-operative instructions for your hand surgery easy to understand? Likert-scale 1-10 (with smile face) Overall, did the provided post-operative instructions for your hand surgery had the appropriate amount of information? Likert-scale 1-10 (with smile face)

within 1 week
patient compliance
Time Frame: within 1 week
Questionnaire to assess patient instruction compliance will be distributed within a week in post operative visit. It consists of 13 questions, each with a score, with 13 being thre maximum patient compliance.
within 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nursing staff patient experience
Time Frame: within 3 months

Nursing staff will be asked to present which patients reached out to clinic number/email with questions and if the instrutions decreased the incidence of such

Assessed as binomial outcome

Have you called your surgeon's office post-operatively regarding any unexpected post-operative course? Yes No Unsure

within 3 months
Dash Scores
Time Frame: within 1 week

Questionnaire to assess patient outcome will be distributed within a week in post operative visit

Quick dash score

QuickDASH DISABILITY/SYMPTOM SCORE= (sum of n responses) - 1 x 25, wherenis equal to the number of completed responses.

within 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 19, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 19, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 2, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Subscribe