Endothelial Side Up Inverted Femtosecond Laser Assisted DSAEK

October 18, 2024 updated by: Tarek Haitham Ezzat Nasr, Dar El Oyoun Hospital

Endothelial Side Up Inverted Femtosecond Laser Assisted DSAEK a Pilot Study

To evaluate the clinical outcomes (pos toperative best corrected visual acuity, endothelial count) and anatomical results (interface smoothness) of DSAEK with Femto LDV-prepared grafts from the endothelial side.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Corneal transplantation is the most frequently performed transplant surgery worldwide, restoring visual function when corneal damage is severe. Traditionally, Penetrating Keratoplasty (PKP) was used to treat all forms of corneal blindness, but it comes with potential complications such as graft rejection, wound leaks, and astigmatism. To address these limitations, Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) emerged as a less invasive alternative, particularly for conditions where only the corneal endothelium is compromised (e.g., Fuch's endothelial dystrophy and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy).

EK began with Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (PLK) and evolved through Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) and Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK), which uses a microkeratome to create a thin corneal graft. DSAEK, however, results in a meniscus-shaped graft with some degree of hyperopic shift postoperatively. Another advancement, Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK), uses only the donor's Descemet membrane and endothelium, providing better visual outcomes and fewer rejection risks. Despite these benefits, DMEK is technically challenging and unsuitable for some complex cases.

Ultrathin (UT) DSAEK introduced sequential microkeratome cuts, achieving graft thickness below 100 µm. This approach offers faster visual recovery and comparable refractive outcomes to DMEK, but with higher perforation risks during graft preparation. Newer graft preparation methods, such as femtosecond laser-assisted techniques, have been introduced to improve consistency, though deeper femtosecond laser cuts sometimes reduce accuracy due to laser scattering.

This study proposes using Femto LDV (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG) to prepare ultrathin DSAEK grafts from the endothelial side to ensure smoother interfaces and consistent graft thickness. Previous in-vitro studies indicate that these grafts offer better endothelial protection and less damage when coated with Viscoat (sodium chondroitin sulfate 4.0%-sodium hyaluronate 3.0%) compared to basic saline solution.

Study Aim The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes (best-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell count) and anatomical outcomes (interface smoothness) of DSAEK with Femto LDV-prepared grafts.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy Patients with bullous keratopathy secondary to intraocular surgeries, iridocorneal endothelial syndrome, or viral keratitis

Exclusion Criteria:

Bullous keratopathy secondary to glaucoma or ocular trauma Corneal stromal scarring or opacities Diseases not affecting the corneal endothelium, including corneal ectasia (e.g., keratoconus, keratoglobus, pellucid marginal degeneration) Epithelial, Bowman layer/anterior stromal, and stromal dystrophies Hypotonic eyes Retinal diseases Any type of optic atrophy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Inverted DSAEK

The Femto LDV Z8 laser system will be set to create a 100 μm thick graft with a 7.5 mm diameter.

The graft will be inverted, placed endothelial side up in the anterior chamber, and coated with Viscoat. A fixation ring will center the graft by holding the scleral rim with forceps.

After cutting, the cornea should remain endothelium-up, stained with Trypan Blue, and dissected using a blunt spatula. The graft will be placed on a Busin glide and coated with Viscoat.

A 3-4 mm corneal incision will be made, and Descemet's membrane will be marked and stripped. The graft will be inserted using the Busin glide, spreading automatically. A small air bubble will fill the anterior chamber to compress the graft for 10 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: after 3 and 6 months
Measurement Tool: Snellen chart Unit of Measure: LogMAR
after 3 and 6 months
Endothelial cell count using specular microscopy
Time Frame: after 3 and 6 months
Measurement Tool: Specular microscopy Time Frame: After 3 months and 6 months
after 3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total central corneal thickness (CCT)
Time Frame: after 3 and 6 months
Measurement Tool: Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) Unit of Measure: Micrometers (µm)
after 3 and 6 months
Donor Corneal Endothelial Thickness (CET)
Time Frame: After 3 months and 6 months
Measurement Tool: Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) Unit of Measure: Micrometers (µm)
After 3 months and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe