- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06675617
EXtensive mulTilayer stEnt treatmeNt in Aortic disSectiOn (EXTENSO)
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Allay® Aortic Stent as Adjunctive Endovascular Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection in Patients Eligible for Thoracic Endovascular Repair With Stent Grafts
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) with stent grafts is recommended for patients with acute complicated or high-risk type B aortic dissection (TBAD) as part of standard of care per current medical guidelines. Although the benefits of TEVAR with stent grafts are well established, there remains a significant risk of late complications, including aortic growth requiring reinterventions, or progression and/or rupture.
In the present clinical investigation, the investigational procedure of adjunctive thoracic stent graft extension with the Allay® Aortic Stent will consist of the placement of a CE-marked Thoracic Stent Graft in the descending thoracic aorta (proximal to the celiac trunk) followed by the implantation of the Allay® Aortic Stent as adjunctive treatment of TBAD.
The study objective is to demonstrate that the Allay® Aortic Stent, used as adjunctive endovascular treatment of Type B aortic dissection in patients eligible for thoracic endovascular aortic repair with stent grafts, results in a low rate of aortic growth requiring secondary reintervention, including open conversion, or aortic rupture in the treated abdominal segment at 12 months. The study will also allow to evaluate the incidence of Major Adverse Events (MAE) following TEVAR, at 30 days post-implantation of the Allay® Aortic Stent.
Based on available data on similar devices, the objective performance goal is set to an expected proportion of 85% freedom from aortic growth requiring secondary reintervention or aortic rupture of the abdominal segment at 12 months.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Virginie Martin
- Phone Number: +3281 71 99 41
- Email: virginie.martin@intressavascular.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Genk, Belgium, 3600
- Not yet recruiting
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- Not yet recruiting
- UZ Leuven
-
Liège, Belgium, 4000
- Recruiting
- Chu Liege
-
-
-
-
-
Sofia, Bulgaria, 1407
- Not yet recruiting
- Acibadem City Clinic University Hospital and Cardiovascular Center
-
-
-
-
-
Paris, France, 75015
- Not yet recruiting
- Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou AP-HP
-
-
-
-
-
Kiel, Germany, 24105
- Recruiting
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
-
Leipzig, Germany, 04103
- Recruiting
- Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR
-
Münster, Germany, 48149
- Not yet recruiting
- University Hospital of Münster
-
-
-
-
-
Belgrad, Serbia, 11000
- Not yet recruiting
- University Clinical Centre of Serbia
-
-
-
-
-
Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 100107
- Recruiting
- Republican Research Centre of Emergency Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Have a type B aortic dissection extending to the celiac trunk or beyond
- Are eligible for thoracic endovascular treatment with stent grafts as per local guidelines, and physician's decision
- Have been elected for treatment with commercially available stent graft as per their IFU within 90 days of dissection symptoms onset
Exclusion Criteria:
General Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 18 years
- Pregnant, breast-feeding or planning on becoming pregnant during the entire duration of the study
- Unable to provide written informed consent
- Unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of the study protocol
- Taking part already in an investigational device or drug study that could interfere with the outcomes being studied
- Active drug addiction or known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment
Medical Exclusion Criteria:
- Aortic rupture, free or contained including haemothorax, increasing periaortic hematoma, or mediastinal hematoma
- Aortic fistula
- Suspicion of bowel necrosis or irreversible visceral ischemia
- Stage 5 chronic kidney disease
- Life expectancy of less than 2 years due to any other medical condition than the dissection to be treated
- Active malignancy
- Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials (including cobalt, chromium, nickel)
- Known sensitivities or allergies to contrast materials that cannot be pre-medicated
- Mycotic aortic aneurysm or active systemic infection that may place the patient at increased risk of endovascular infection
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class V (moribund patient not expected to live 24 hours with or without operation)
- Diagnosed or suspected congenital degenerative connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's, Loeys-Dietz or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome)
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy, bleeding diathesis or refusal of blood transfusion
- Any major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular ischemic event, including myocardial infarction or stroke, or treatment of such event, within 90 days prior to enrolment
- Any aortic-related interventional or surgical procedure within 30 days prior to enrolment
- Any planned aortic-related interventional or surgical procedure within 30 days after the study procedure
Anatomical Exclusion Criteria:
- Aneurysmal dilatation of the false lumen defined as maximum transaortic diameter >55 mm in women or >60 mm in men in the thoraco-abdominal segment or >50 mm in women or >55 mm in men in the abdominal segment, measured inner-wall to inner-wall;
- Inadequate proximal landing zone for the stent graft, such zone being <20 mm long
- Inadequate proximal landing zone geometry for the Allay® Aortic Stent (e.g. aortic kink)
- Planned implantation of a stent graft with a distal diameter >38 mm or <20 mm
- Aorta or iliac anatomy not allowing the advancement of the delivery system
- Subject in whom the thoracic stent graft is either 1) not implanted in its intended position and/or 2) leads to any serious device complication, and/or who has 3) persistent static obstruction of the visceral or both renal arteries, prior to Allay® Aortic Stent implantation, will not be implanted with the Allay® Aortic Stent and will be withdrawn from the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Allay Aortic Stent
A covered thoracic stent graft is first deployed in supraceliac position as per standard of care then followed by the implantation of the Allay® Aortic Stent deployed from within the stent graft, extending below the celiac trunk to the end of the dissected aorta, typically the aortoiliac bifurcation.
|
Endovascular treatment of an aortic dissection
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Freedom from aortic growth requiring secondary reintervention, including open conversion, or aortic rupture in the region treated by the Allay® Aortic Stent at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
|
An aortic growth requiring reintervention in the region treated with the Allay® Aortic Stent is defined as an increase in maximum aortic transverse diameter >10mm at 12 months relative to the first post-operative CT scan done at discharge and not later than 30 days.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants with Successful Technical Performance of the Allay® Aortic Stent Implantation
Time Frame: At index procedure
|
Technical success of the implantation of the Allay® Aortic Stent will be assessed at index procedure as the composite endpoint of the following:
|
At index procedure
|
|
Incidence of Major Adverse Events (MAE) within 30 Days After Allay® Aortic Stent Implantation
Time Frame: 30 days
|
The safety endpoint will be assessed as the freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE) at 30 days, defined as the composite endpoint of the following new-onset adverse events:
|
30 days
|
|
Freedom from all-cause mortality;
Time Frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits, at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
The percentage of patients alive from any cause post-discharge at follow-up intervals.
|
Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits, at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
|
|
Freedom from Dissection-Related Mortality
Time Frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
The percentage of patients who are alive and free from dissection-related mortality, if known.
|
Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
|
Freedom from Readmission (Post-Discharge)
Time Frame: Subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
The percentage of patients who have not been readmitted to the hospital post-discharge.
|
Subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
|
Freedom from Aorta-Related Reintervention
Time Frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
The percentage of patients who have not required a reintervention related to the aorta, including details on the type and frequency if any.
|
Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
|
Freedom from Open Conversion
Time Frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
The percentage of patients who have not required conversion to open surgical intervention.
|
Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
|
Freedom from New Ischemia
Time Frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
The percentage of patients free from new ischemic events identified post-intervention.
|
Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
|
Freedom from Reintervention Related to Side Branches
Time Frame: Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
The percentage of patients who have not required reintervention related to side branches.
|
Immediately at discharge and subsequent follow-up visits at 30 days, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months.
|
|
Aortic rupture
Time Frame: Assessed at discharge or not later than 30 days from index procedure, and then compared to pre-operative CT scan
|
Incidence of aortic rupture observed through CT imaging post-intervention.
|
Assessed at discharge or not later than 30 days from index procedure, and then compared to pre-operative CT scan
|
|
Percentage of Participants with Patent Major Aortic Branches Post-Allay® Aortic Stent Implantation
Time Frame: Assessed at discharge (or within 30 days from the index procedure) and compared to the pre-operative CT scan.
|
Assessment of changes in the patency of major aortic branches post-intervention.
|
Assessed at discharge (or within 30 days from the index procedure) and compared to the pre-operative CT scan.
|
|
Percentage of Participants with Patent Major Descending Aortic Branches Covered by the Allay® Aortic Stent
Time Frame: Assessed at discharge (or within 30 days from the index procedure) and compared to the pre-operative CT scan.
|
Evaluation of changes in the patency of major descending aortic branches covered by the Allay® Aortic Stent.
|
Assessed at discharge (or within 30 days from the index procedure) and compared to the pre-operative CT scan.
|
|
Percentage of Participants with Device Deficiencies Detected by CT Imaging Post-Allay® Aortic Stent Implantation
Time Frame: Assessed at discharge (or within 30 days from the index procedure) and compared to the pre-operative CT scan.
|
Assessment of device deficiencies observed through CT imaging, including loss of patency, kink, collapse, migration, and overlap separation.
|
Assessed at discharge (or within 30 days from the index procedure) and compared to the pre-operative CT scan.
|
|
Aortic growth
Time Frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, then compared to first post-operative CT scan done at discharge and not later than 30 days from index procedure
|
Measurement of aortic growth over time as assessed through CT imaging.
|
Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months, then compared to first post-operative CT scan done at discharge and not later than 30 days from index procedure
|
|
Aortic Rupture
Time Frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan done at discharge.
|
Incidence of aortic rupture observed during follow-up CT imaging.
|
Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan done at discharge.
|
|
New Dissection or Extension of Dissection
Time Frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
Occurrence of any new dissection or extension of existing dissection observed in follow-up CT scans.
|
Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
|
Percentage of Participants with Fistula Formation Detected on Follow-Up CT Imaging
Time Frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
Identification of fistula formation during follow-up CT imaging assessments.
|
Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
|
Change in True Lumen, False Lumen, and Transaortic Diameters
Time Frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
Measurement of changes in the true lumen, false lumen, and transaortic diameters through follow-up CT imaging.
|
Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
|
Percentage of Participants with Maintained Patency in Major Aortic Branches on Follow-Up Imaging
Time Frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
Evaluation of changes in the patency of major aortic branches during follow-up imaging.
|
Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
|
Percentage of Participants with Maintained Patency in Major Descending Aortic Branches Covered by the Allay® Aortic Stent on Follow-Up Imaging
Time Frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
Observation of changes in the patency of major descending aortic branches covered by the Allay® Aortic Stent.
|
Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
|
Percentage of Participants with Maintained False Lumen Perfusion and Patency in All Treated Segments on Follow-Up Imaging
Time Frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
Assessment of false lumen perfusion and patency across all treated segments.
|
Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
|
Percentage of Participants with Device Deficiencies on Follow-Up Imaging
Time Frame: Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
Identification of device deficiencies through CT imaging, including but not limited to stent integrity, patency loss (kink, collapse), migration, separation, and endoleak Types I or III.
|
Assessed at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, compared to the first post-operative CT scan.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Wolf-Hans Eilenberg, MD, PhD, FEBVS, Medical University of Vienna
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CP-P3-03-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Type B Aortic Dissection
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRecruitingType A Aortic Dissection With Residual Type B Dissection | Chronic Type B Aortic DissectionFrance
-
Washington University School of MedicineNot yet recruitingType B Aortic DissectionUnited States
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityNot yet recruitingAortic Dissection Type B
-
Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalActive, not recruiting
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...RecruitingACute Uncomplicated Type b Aortic Dissection: Endovascular Repair vs. Best Medical Therapy (ACUTE-B)Distal Aortic Dissection | Dissection, Aortic Acute | Acute Type B Aortic Dissection (Uncomplicated)United States
-
Centre Cardiologique du NordUniversita degli Studi di Genova; Campus Bio-Medico University; Henri Mondor... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationAortic Valve Insufficiency | Type B Aortic Dissection | Aortic Diseases | Ascending Aortic Dissection | Aortic Arch | Aortic Root Dissection | Aortic Root Dilatation | Type A Aortic DissectionFrance
-
Hangzhou Endonom Medtech Co., Ltd.CompletedAortic Dissection Type BChina
-
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of CirculationUnknownAortic Dissection Type B
-
Yonsei UniversityWithdrawn
-
JOTEC GmbHCompletedType B Aortic DissectionGermany, Spain, Poland, Italy
Clinical Trials on Allay Aortic Stent
-
Asan Medical CenterTerminatedAortic Aneurysm | Aortic Dissection | Stent-graftKorea, Republic of
-
Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.RecruitingThoracoabdominal; Aortic, Aneurysm, DissectingChina
-
Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.CompletedThoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm | Pararenal Aortic AneurysmChina
-
Richard E. RingelCompleted
-
Hangzhou Endonom Medtech Co., Ltd.Not yet recruitingAortic DissectionChina
-
Hangzhou Endonom Medtech Co., Ltd.Not yet recruiting
-
Endospan Ltd.RecruitingAortic Aneurysm | Aortic Dissection | Penetrating Aortic Ulcer | Intramural HematomaUnited States, New Zealand
-
University Paul Sabatier of ToulouseCompleted
-
Medtronic CardiovascularNo longer availableAbdominal Aortic AneurysmsUnited States
-
Endospan Ltd.Completed