Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection Repair (STAAD)

January 18, 2024 updated by: Francesco Nappi, Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Surgical Strategy for Repair of Type A Aortic Dissection: A Multicenter Registry

Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a potentially life-threatening pathology associated with significant risk of mortality and morbidity. In acute forms of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) mortality is 50% by 24 h and 50% of patients die before reaching a specialist center. Rapid diagnosis and subsequent prompt surgical repair remain the primary goal for these patients.

In the last decade it has been observed that improvements in diagnostic techniques, initial management and increased clinical awareness have contributed to a substantial increase in the number of patients benefiting from a prompt diagnosis and undergoing surgery.However, survival after surgical repair has not yet reached optimal follow-ups and is burdened by high in-hospital mortality(16-18%)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For patients requiring surgical repair for a TAAD, there is still some disagreement regarding which factors should be considered during the preoperative evaluation, the best decision-making process to undertake that best assesses procedural risk, and how operative mortality can be predicted. Furthermore, the impact of different surgical strategies on outcomes remains unclear.This prospective study was designed to evaluate the impact of the center volume-outcome relationship and that on mortality which remain poorly understood. A better understanding of the determinants of outcome in patients undergoing surgery could support decision making, aid in the design of service delivery, and improve outcomes for surviving patients who are referred to specialized centers for treatment of aortic disease.Furthermore, the study aims to evaluate whether precise risk stratification can provide better patient counseling and be used for unit-surgeon benchmarking. Ultimately in the present study, we aimed to investigate outcome predictors in patients undergoing surgery for TAAD, including clinical and perioperative variables as well as to evaluate follow up beyond 15 years.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Saint-Denis, France, 93200
        • Francesco Nappi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The STAAD study is a prospective multicenter registry including patients who will underwent surgery for acute TAAD at 6 centers of cardiac surgery located in 2 European countries and Japan (3 France, 2 Italy and 1 Hokkaido ). Data will be prospectively collected from patients (conservative vs estensive Type A aortic dissection repair) who will be treated during the study period. In addition, the aim will be to gather further data for future clinical research on this topic. Preoperative and postoperative variables will be included during in-hospital stay and follow-up data instead they will be included on subsequent encounters for all other patients who will be hospitalized.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged > 18 years
  • TAAD or intramural hematoma involving the ascending aorta
  • Symptoms started within 7 days from surgery
  • Primary surgical repair of acute TAAD
  • Any other major cardiac surgical procedure concomitant with surgery for TAAD.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged < 18 years
  • Onset of symptoms > 7 days from surgery
  • Prior procedure for TAAD
  • Concomitant endocarditis;
  • TAAD secondary to blunt or penetrating chest trauma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Ascending Aorta Replacement (AAR) with or without Hemiarch Repair
Patients who will require a conservative prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta with or without hemiarch.Patients who required a concomitant aortic valve replacement with conventional xenograft or mechanical prosthesis
Cardiac arrest will be performed by administering a potassium-rich antegrade cardioplegia solution delivered directly into the coronary ostium or in the case of aortic regurgitation after insertion of the coronary sinus cannula.The aorta will be resected up to the sinotubular junction and the thrombus located in the false lumen of the aortic root will be removed so that the aortic lesion can be visualized. The commissures will be resuspended using 4-0 or 5-0 sutures reinforced with a Teflon pledget above every commissure. A 4-0 or 5-0 polypropylene suture will be chosen to seal the proximal anastomosis and this suture line will also be used to secure the intima to the adventitia. In patients demonstrating normal-sized aortic roots associated with poor-quality valve leaflets, concomitant aortic valve replacement with conventional xenograft or mechanical prosthesis will be preferable.
Other Names:
  • Ascending Aorta Replacement with Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR)
Ascending Aorta Replacement (AAR) with Aortic Root Replacement (ARR)
Patient who will require the extensive procedure including ascending aorta replacement associated to root replacement with or without sparing of the aortic valve
Patients who experienced dilatation of the sinuses of Valsalva > 4.5 cm in diameter on computed tomography imaging, those with connective tissue disease, or those in whom intimal tears extended into the sinuses, will receive replacement of the aortic root using a biologic or mechanical composite valve graft or valve-sparing root reimplantation procedure associated to AAR
Other Names:
  • ARR with or without aortic valve sparing
Ascending Aorta Replacement with Total Arch Replacement (TARP)
Patient who will require the extensive procedure including ascending aorta replacement associated to TARP
Total arch replacement procedures (TARP) will performed with the use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and with either antegrade or retrograde cerebral perfusion, maintaining systemic cooling between 19°C to 25°C and depending on the surgeon's practice.TARPs will be carried out using 1- and 4-branch grafts and involved the resection of all the aortic tissue up to the left common carotid artery (total arch)
Other Names:
  • AAR with TARP or Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET)
Root and Ascending Aorta Replacement with Total Arch Replacement
Patient who will require the extensive procedure including root and ascending aorta replacement associated to TARP
This extensive procedure will include complete replacement of the anterior thoracic aorta extending to part or all of the aortic arch. It will be performed with the previously reported techniques
Other Names:
  • Full anterior thoracic aorta replacement with partial hemiarch repair or TARP or FET

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative Mortality (OM)
Time Frame: 30-day
Patients who died within 30 days
30-day
Rate of permanent Neurologic Deficit (PND)
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants with acute episode of a focal or global neurological deficit. Rates of alteration of degree of consciousness, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, numbness or sensory loss affecting one side of the body, dysphasia or aphasia, hemianopsia, amaurosis fugax. To consider rate of other neurologic signs or symptoms consistent with stroke duration of focal or global neurologic deficit greater than 24 hours.
30-day
Rate of perioperative Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants with MI based on fourth universal definition.
30-day
Rate of composite of Major Adverse Events (MAE)
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants with MAE which will include the composite rate of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, need for dialysis, or need for tracheostomy according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE)
30-day
Rate of mesenteric ischemia
Time Frame: 30-day
Rate of abdominal pain with or without nausea and vomiting and rectal bleeding or bloody diarrhea
30-day
Rate of acute heart failure (AHF)
Time Frame: 30-day and in-hospital mortality
Number of participants with postoperative AHF who will require prolonged use of concentration of inotropes for a period greater than 24 h and/or the insertion of any mechanical circulatory support device.
30-day and in-hospital mortality

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Transient Neurologic Deficit (TND)
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants who will complicate postoperatively with episode of TND which will include complication rate such as confusion, delirium, agitation
30-day
Rate of spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants with SCI intended as rate of paraplegia and/or paraparesis
30-day
Rate of composite of Major Adverse Pulmonary Events (MAPE)
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants with MAPE which will include the composite rate of intubation >48 hours, pneumonia, reintubation, tracheostomy according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE)
30-day
Rate of mechanical circulatory support
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants who will receive the use of intra-aortic balloon pump and/or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postoperative acute heart failure.
30-day
Rate of acute kidney injury
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants with postoperative change in serum creatinine concentration. Severity will be stratified on the basis of number of participants with the KDIGO (Kney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) criteria.
30-day
Rate of perioperative bleeding
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants who will receive postoperative transfused red blood cell units. The E-CABG ( coronary artery by pass grafting) classification of bleeding rate has been proposed as a simple classification of perioperative bleeding
30-day
Reoperation for bleeding
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants who will receive postoperative chest reopening for excessive bleeding.
30-day
Rate of reintervention
Time Frame: 18-years
The number of participants who will require reoperation for the aortic valve, proximal aorta, or distal aorta.
18-years
Rate of late survival
Time Frame: 18-years
Data on patient's survival status will be collected
18-years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of urgent procedure
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants who will require scheduled procedure within 24 hours of admission.
30-day
Rate of emergency grade 1
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants will require procedure within 24 hours of hospital admission and who are symptomatic or minimally symptomatic with stable hemodynamic conditions and no signs of malperfusion.
30-day
Rate of emergency grade 2
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants who will require procedure within the first 6 hours of hospital admission due to hemodynamic instability despite use of concentration inotropes and/or malperfusion.
30-day
Rate of salvage grade 1
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants who will require immediate surgical procedure. Rate of cardio pulmonary resuscitation with external chest compressions and/or open cardiac massage between induction of anesthesia and initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass.
30-day
Rate of salvage grade 2
Time Frame: 30-day
Number of participants who will require immediate surgical procedure. Rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with external chest compressions en route to the operating theatre or prior to induction of anesthesia.
30-day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Francesco Nappi, MD, Cardiac Surgery Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on Conservative Root- Sparing Aortic Valve Resuspension with or without Hemiarch Repair

3
Subscribe