Conduit Cages and Fibergraft BG Putty

January 20, 2026 updated by: Nitin Agarwal

Assess Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Conduit Cages and Fibergraft in Cervical and Lumbar Procedures

The Conduit cages are intended to restore the intervertebral height and to facilitate the intervertebral body fusion in the cervical and lumbar spine in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease and instabilities at one or more levels of the spine. The Fibergraft Bioactive Glass (BG) is engineered to mimic the body's natural bone healing process. While previous studies have described the use of conduit cages in interbody fixation procedures, these studies did not specifically study the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who have received these implants in addition to Fibergraft. We aim to recruit patients with degenerative disc disease, and instabilities at one to multilevel contiguous levels between C2-T1 and 1-2 contiguous levels between L2-S1 of the spine with accompanying radicular symptoms, ruptured or herniated discs, and pseudarthrosis and spondylodesis. We will then follow these patients for a duration of two years to report their clinical and radiographic outcomes to determine fusion, complication rate, and revision surgeries if any.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Recruiting
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with spinal conditions mentioned in inclusion/exclusion criteria

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Have a radiograph-based diagnosis of degenerative disc disease, ruptured or herniated discs,
  3. Pathology of the cervical or lumbar spine.
  4. Pathology to be between C2-T1 in the cervical group.
  5. Pathology to be between L2-S1 in the lumbar group.
  6. Patients with 1-2 contiguous levels in both ACDF and Lumbar groups.
  7. Patients receiving the surgery/devices as standard of care prescribed by the treating physician.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients < 18 years
  2. BMI > 40 kg/m2 to be excluded
  3. Patients with a bone density (DEXA) score of <2.0 to be excluded
  4. 3 or more levels for ACDF or Lumbar interbody to be excluded
  5. Patients with previous pseudoarthrosis or failed spondylodesis to be excluded
  6. Current smokers and patients who quit smoking within 6 weeks prior to presentation will be excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fusion
Time Frame: 2 years (At baseline, postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months)
We will assess fusion with regular x-rays and CT scans at 1 and 2-year postoperatively.
2 years (At baseline, postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 years (At baseline, postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months)
We will have patients fill out validated tools for PROs to assess how the patient is doing postoperatively
2 years (At baseline, postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months)
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 2 years (At baseline, postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months)
We will have patients fill out validated tools for PROs to assess how the patient is doing
2 years (At baseline, postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months)
SF-12
Time Frame: 2 years (At baseline, postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months)
We will have patients fill out validated tools for PROs to assess how the patient is doing
2 years (At baseline, postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months)
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: 2 years (At baseline, postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months)
We will have patients fill out validated tools for PROs to assess how the patient is doing
2 years (At baseline, postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nitin Agarwal, MD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease

Clinical Trials on Use of conduit cages and fibergraft BG Putty

Subscribe