- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06758466
Bipolar TURP Versus Bipolar Enucleation for BPH Management
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Bipolar TURP and Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) With Prostate Volumes Between 30-80 Grams
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Create a research protocol in a prospective study to compare bipolar transurethral resection of prostate vs bipolar enucleation of prostate between 30 and 80 gm in management of BPH
Okay, here's a detailed research protocol for a prospective study comparing Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) and Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate (BipoLEP) for BPH, specifically focusing on prostates between 30-80 grams:
Study Title: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Bipolar TURP and Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) with Prostate Volumes between 30-80 grams
1. Introduction
Background: Briefly introduce Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), its prevalence, and the associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Highlight the common surgical interventions: TURP and, more recently, enucleation techniques.
Problem Statement: State that while both bipolar TURP and BipoLEP are established treatments, there's a need for a direct comparison, especially for moderate-sized prostates (30-80g). There's an ongoing debate regarding which approach offers superior outcomes and a better balance of efficacy and safety.
Rationale: Explain why this study is necessary. This can be because there is limited direct
Primary Objective: To compare the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 months post-surgery between Bipolar TURP and BipoLEP in men with BPH and prostate volumes between 30-80 grams.
Secondary Objectives:
To compare perioperative outcomes including:
Operative time (minutes)
Catheterization time (days)
Length of hospital stay (days)
Blood loss (change in hemoglobin)
Requirement of blood transfusion
Incidence of perioperative complications (e.g., TUR syndrome, bleeding, infection, clot retention)
To compare postoperative functional outcomes including:
Peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) at 3, 6, and 12 months
Post-void residual (PVR) volume at 3, 6, and 12 months
Quality of life (QoL) using a validated questionnaire at 3, 6, and 12 months
To compare the incidence of postoperative complications including:
Urinary tract infection (UTI)
Urinary incontinence (UI)
Urethral stricture
Bladder neck contracture
Need for re-operation within 12 months.
To compare overall patient satisfaction using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 3, 6, and 12 months
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male patients aged 45-80 years diagnosed with symptomatic BPH.
- Prostate volume between 30-80 grams as determined by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) performed within 4 weeks before randomization.
- Moderate to severe LUTS with an IPSS of ≥ 8.
- Failure of medical management.
- Patients able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of prostate cancer.
- History of previous prostate surgery (including any procedure for BPH or prostate cancer).
- History of urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture.
- Neurogenic bladder dysfunction.
- Significant coagulopathy.
- Uncontrolled urinary tract infection.
- Patient on anticoagulant medication.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Bipolar enucleation
|
Prostate removal
|
|
Active Comparator: Bipolar resection
|
Prostate removal
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
Qmax
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
PVR
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Kasr Alainy- Cairo University
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
-
University of CalgaryNot yet recruitingBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow ObstructionCanada
-
San Carlo di Nancy HospitalElesta S.R.L.CompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy With Outflow Obstruction | Prostate HyperplasiaItaly
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia
-
St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonOntario Ministry of Health and Long Term CareCompletedBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaCanada
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) | Benign Prostatic Enlargement (BPE)Italy
-
Beni-Suef UniversityRecruitingBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Acute Urinary Retention | Benign Prostatic ObstructionEgypt
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedProstatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic, Czechia, Sweden
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic
-
South Valley UniversityRecruitingBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Symptomatic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Requiring Surgical Resection | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow ObstructionEgypt
-
IMBiotechnologies Ltd.CompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic HypertrophyCanada
Clinical Trials on Prostate surgery
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterTerminatedBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaUnited States
-
Rocky Mountain Cancer CentersDr. Dennis CarterWithdrawn
-
Fudan UniversityEnrolling by invitation
-
The Krongrad InstituteUnknownProstatitis | Chronic Prostatitis With Chronic Pelvic Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...Not yet recruitingPROSTATE CANCER | Prostate BiopsyChina
-
Ardeshir RastinehadPhilips HealthcareRecruitingProstate Cancer | Prostate Disease | Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen | Family History of Prostate Cancer | Positive Digital Rectal ExamUnited States
-
Albany Medical CollegeRecruitingProstate Cancer | DiagnosisUnited States, Canada
-
NanosticsAlberta Health servicesRecruiting
-
University of California, San FranciscoFilament Health Corp.Active, not recruiting
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Completed