- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07552961
Feasibility and Utility of a Prehabilitation Program for Use in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Who Have Elected to Undergo Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).
Evaluating the Feasibility of a Comprehensive Prehabilitation Program for Use in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a debilitating condition which is highly prevalent in older males, up to 45% of those over the age of 45 are affected and 80% of those over the age of 70 are affected. While not all men with BPH experience problematic symptoms, many will experience lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) including difficulty passing urine, recurrent urinary tract infections, bladder stones, and hematuria. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) is the gold standard in terms of surgical BPH management and is associated with a low risk for requiring repeat interventions. However, in the weeks following HoLEP procedures many men will experience transient urinary incontinence which can be distressing to patients.
In the setting of prostate cancer, exercise and mental health supports prior to surgery has been shown to improve incontinence and post-surgical recovery. This is often termed prehabilitation and consists of programming done in the months before surgery. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and feasibility of prehabilitation programming prior to HoLEP procedures for men with BPH.
The investigators will be randomizing 40 patients into 2 groups, one receiving standard of care interventions prior to their HoLEP surgery and one receiving at least 12 weeks of comprehensive prehabilitation programming including: pelvic floor physiotherapy, access to additional informational resources, and access to mental health supports including individual and couples counselling. In both groups the investigators will be collecting key demographics and clinical information from patients as well as assessing their urinary function through several questionnaires before prehabilitation, immediately before surgery, and up to 1 year after surgery.
The investigators hope to establish that prehabilitation is a safe and feasible option for these patients. Secondarily investigators hope to provide evidence that prehabilitation improves incontinence faster following HoLEP procedures and improves post-surgical recovery.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2V 1P9
- Southern Alberta Institute of Urology
-
Contact:
- Mark Assmus, MD, MPH, FRCSC
- Phone Number: 403-943-8900
- Email: info@prostatecancercentre.ca
-
Principal Investigator:
- Mark Assmus, MD, MPH, FRCSC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Opting to undergo HoLEP procedure for the treatment of BPH
- Estimated prostate size (>60 ml)
- Have received permission to exercise from their primary care provider
- Access to a computer/ smartphone and internet access to complete associated questionnaires and access online educational resource
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Other medical or psychiatric conditions which preclude the ability to participate in exercise or utilize the online education module
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Participants in this arm will receive standard information and recommendations from a surgeon prior to HoLEP.
These include recommendations to participate in exercise and information about what to expect with the procedure.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Comprehensive Prehabilitation Programming
Participants in this arm will receive the standard of care recommendations from a urologist but will also complete a comprehensive prehabilitation program over 12-weeks within 5 months of the procedure.
|
This prehabilitation program will include an exercise component consisting of once weekly pelvic floor physiotherapy sessions as well as recommendations to complete pelvic floor strengthening exercises and 150 minutes of moderate to intense cardiovascular exercise at home.
Completion of these exercises will be self-reported biweekly through an exercise tracking form submitted to study staff.
This program will also include access to a comprehensive online module with information about BPH and the HoLEP procedure.
Lastly, this will consist of access to mental health supports including individual and couples counselling.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility through modified system usability scale as well as through recruitment rates, adherence rates, and retention rates.
Time Frame: Only assessed at the pre-surgical follow-up (ie. from baseline to pre-surgery), between 1-4 weeks prior to surgery.
|
Feasibility will be assessed through a feasibility questionnaire administered only to participants in the intervention group prior to surgery.
This questionnaire is a modified version of a previously established system usability scale which consists of 10 questions assessing the feasibility of the program which participants will rate on a 1-5 Likert scale.
Four additional yes/no questions regarding feasibility for further assessment.
Feasibility will also be assessed based on recruitment (with a goal of 30% of patients approached based on previous studies), adherence to the exercise protocol (with a goal of 70% adherence based on previous studies), and retention through the full 12-weeks of the intervention (with a goal of 80% based on previous studies.
|
Only assessed at the pre-surgical follow-up (ie. from baseline to pre-surgery), between 1-4 weeks prior to surgery.
|
|
Safety assessed through side effects of prehabilitation programming and reporting of adverse events.
Time Frame: To be administered every 3 weeks of the 12-week prehabilitation program starting with the 3rd week and ending with the 12th week.
|
Safety will be assessed through a modified version of safety questionnaires used in previously reported exercise and counselling studies.
This will consist of 8 questions (graded on a 0-10 Likert scale) assessing the side effects of exercise programming, 4 questions (graded on a 0-10 Likert scale) assessing the side effects of mental health supports, and a question assessing adverse events.
Any adverse events would be reported and graded minor (Grade ≤1 - not requiring medical intervention) or serious (Grade ≥2 - requiring medical intervention) based on previously established National Health Institute criteria.
|
To be administered every 3 weeks of the 12-week prehabilitation program starting with the 3rd week and ending with the 12th week.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26-, and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
The IPSS is a 7 question screen for lower urinary tract symptoms with each question graded on a 0-5 Likert scale.
Greater scores indicate more severe dysfunction with the following cutoffs: mild (0-7), moderate (8-19), or severe (20-35).
|
To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26-, and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
|
Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index (M-ISI)
Time Frame: To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26-, and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
The M-ISI is a 10 item assessment of urinary incontinence symptoms with questions 1-8 being the total severity and questions 9 and 10 being the bother subsection of the questionnaire.
Each question is graded on a 0-4 Likert scale with greater scores indicating more severe incontinence.
|
To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26-, and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
|
Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM)
Time Frame: To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26-, and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
The SHIM is a 5-item assessment of erectile dysfunction severity with each question scored on a 0-5 Likert scale and higher scores indicating better erectile function.
The following score cutoffs are used to describe dysfunction: 1-7: Severe ED, 8-11: Moderate ED, 12-16: Mild to Moderate ED, 17-21: Mild ED, 22-25: Normal Function.
|
To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26-, and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
|
Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EjD)
Time Frame: To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26-, and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
The MSHQ-EjD is a 4-item assessment of ejaculatory dysfunction which is broken into a function score for the first 3 questions and a bother score for the last question.
Each question is graded on a 0-5 Likert scale with higher scores indicating better ejaculatory function.
|
To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26-, and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
|
Euroquol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26-, and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a 6-item assessment of quality of life.
The first 5 items are graded on a 1-5 Likert scale with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
The last item is a 0-100 rating of overall health status with higher scores indicating better health.
|
To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26-, and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
|
Novel Incontinence Questionnaire
Time Frame: To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26- and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
This is a questionnaire the investigators designed with yes/no questions to assess whether patients are experiencing any incontinence.
Pre-surgery, the questionnaire is divided based on catheterization status - if a participant has a catheter it asks whether they had incontinence prior to catheterization and if a participant does not have a catheter it asks whether they currently have incontinence.
Post-surgery, the questionnaire assesses whether the participant still has incontinence and if they report they do not, asks which week after surgery they stopped experiencing incontinence.
|
To be collected at baseline, pre-surgery, and 4-, 12-, 26- and 52-weeks post-surgery.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SS)
Time Frame: To be collected at baseline, every 3 weeks during the 12-week prehabilitation program (starting at week 3 and ending at week 12), and at 4-, 12-, and 26-weeks post-surgery.
|
This is a 7-item measure which collects information regarding the minutes of physical activity performed per week across different domains including: walking, mild activity, moderate activity, and strenuous activity.
While patients are participating in the prehabilitation program an item will also be added for participants to report their adherence to home pelvic floor strengthening exercises and the questionnaire will be modified for them to report their 3-week physical activity average rather than only for a single week.
This measure assesses minutes of physical activity per week so the minimum value is 0 minutes and the maximum value is 10080 minutes with greater values representing more physical activity.
Each minute also has a multiplier applied for the metabolic equivalent of the task (METs) in order to generate a weekly number of METs.
Again higher numbers are associated with more physical activity.
|
To be collected at baseline, every 3 weeks during the 12-week prehabilitation program (starting at week 3 and ending at week 12), and at 4-, 12-, and 26-weeks post-surgery.
|
|
Size of surgical specimen
Time Frame: Peri-operative period, up to 8 weeks after surgery pending results of surgical pathology.
|
Once pathology is available the weight of the prostate tissue resected in grams will be recorded.
|
Peri-operative period, up to 8 weeks after surgery pending results of surgical pathology.
|
|
Estimated pre-surgical prostate size
Time Frame: Peri-operative period, up to 8 weeks after surgery pending results of surgical pathology.
|
Prior to the procedure, imaging and cystoscopy notes will be reviewed to obtain an estimate of prostate size.
In the case of conflicting sizes reported, the most recent size on imaging will be recorded.
|
Peri-operative period, up to 8 weeks after surgery pending results of surgical pathology.
|
|
Post-surgical catheterization
Time Frame: Peri-operative period, up to 8 weeks after surgery pending results of surgical pathology.
|
The number of days each patient was catheterized after their HoLEP procedure.
|
Peri-operative period, up to 8 weeks after surgery pending results of surgical pathology.
|
|
Surgical complications
Time Frame: Peri-operative period, up to 8 weeks after surgery pending results of surgical pathology.
|
Any complications which occur during the surgery or post-operatively while still admitted will be recorded.
|
Peri-operative period, up to 8 weeks after surgery pending results of surgical pathology.
|
|
Pre-surgical complications of BPH
Time Frame: Pre-operative period beginning after study enrollment until the date of surgery, maximum of 20 weeks prior to surgery.
|
All complications relating to BPH requiring an emergency department visit or hospital admission will be recorded including the type of complication and duration of stay in the case of an admission.
|
Pre-operative period beginning after study enrollment until the date of surgery, maximum of 20 weeks prior to surgery.
|
|
Post-surgical outpatient complications
Time Frame: Post-discharge from HoLEP procedure until final follow-up, up to 52 weeks after surgery.
|
All complications relating to the HoLEP procedure or BPH after discharge from the hospital following HoLEP procedure will be recorded if requiring an emergency department visit or admission to hospital including the type of complication and duration of stay if admitted.
|
Post-discharge from HoLEP procedure until final follow-up, up to 52 weeks after surgery.
|
|
Duration of hospital stay
Time Frame: Peri-operative period, up to 4 weeks after surgery.
|
The number of days admitted for the HoLEP procedure will be recorded.
|
Peri-operative period, up to 4 weeks after surgery.
|
|
Post-void residual
Time Frame: From enrollment in the study until final follow-up, up to an 72 week period from 20 weeks prior to surgery until 52 weeks after.
|
All available post-void residuals will be recorded, this includes pre-operatively if performed as well as the post-void residual typically collected at discharge.
If post-void residual is obtained at any post-operative clinic visits then this will be recorded as well.
|
From enrollment in the study until final follow-up, up to an 72 week period from 20 weeks prior to surgery until 52 weeks after.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hurst C, Weston KL, Weston M. The effect of 12 weeks of combined upper- and lower-body high-intensity interval training on muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 May;31(5):661-671. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1015-9. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
- Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
- Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health. 2008 Apr;31(2):180-91. doi: 10.1002/nur.20247.
- Sim J, Lewis M. The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
- Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM. Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Oct 21;8:115. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-115.
- Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, George SM, Olson RD. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):2020-2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854.
- Santa Mina D, Hilton WJ, Matthew AG, Awasthi R, Bousquet-Dion G, Alibhai SMH, Au D, Fleshner NE, Finelli A, Clarke H, Aprikian A, Tanguay S, Carli F. Prehabilitation for radical prostatectomy: A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 7.
- Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2008 Jan;53(1):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.08.036. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
- Gilling PJ, Wilson LC, King CJ, Westenberg AM, Frampton CM, Fraundorfer MR. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years. BJU Int. 2012 Feb;109(3):408-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10359.x. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
- Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, Bandera EV, Hamilton KK, Grant B, McCullough M, Byers T, Gansler T. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;62(4):243-74. doi: 10.3322/caac.21142. Epub 2012 Apr 26. Erratum In: CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 May;63(3):215.
- Centemero A, Rigatti L, Giraudo D, Lazzeri M, Lughezzani G, Zugna D, Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Guazzoni G. Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise for early continence after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled study. Eur Urol. 2010 Jun;57(6):1039-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.028. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
- Nam JK, Kim HW, Lee DH, Han JY, Lee JZ, Park SW. Risk Factors for Transient Urinary Incontinence after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate. World J Mens Health. 2015 Aug;33(2):88-94. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2015.33.2.88. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
- Suskind AM, Dunn RL, Morgan DM, DeLancey JO, McGuire EJ, Wei JT. The Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index (M-ISI): a clinical measure for type, severity, and bother related to urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Sep;33(7):1128-34. doi: 10.1002/nau.22468. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
- Geraerts I, Van Poppel H, Devoogdt N, Joniau S, Van Cleynenbreugel B, De Groef A, Van Kampen M. Influence of preoperative and postoperative pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) compared with postoperative PFMT on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):766-72. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.013. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
- Michalak J, Tzou D, Funk J. HoLEP: the gold standard for the surgical management of BPH in the 21(st) Century. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2015 Apr 25;3(1):36-42. eCollection 2015.
- Das AK, Teplitsky S, Chandrasekar T, Perez T, Guo J, Leong JY, Shenot PJ. Stress Urinary Incontinence post-Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: a Single-Surgeon Experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Jul-Aug;46(4):624-631. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0411.
- Anan G, Kaiho Y, Iwamura H, Ito J, Kohada Y, Mikami J, Sato M. Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise for early continence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a randomized controlled study. BMC Urol. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0570-5.
- Rosen RC, Catania JA, Althof SE, Pollack LM, O'Leary M, Seftel AD, Coon DW. Development and validation of four-item version of Male Sexual Health Questionnaire to assess ejaculatory dysfunction. Urology. 2007 May;69(5):805-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.036.
- Cho MC, Park JH, Jeong MS, Yi JS, Ku JH, Oh SJ, Kim SW, Paick JS. Predictor of de novo urinary incontinence following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Sep;30(7):1343-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.21050. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
- Sandhu JS, Bixler BR, Dahm P, Goueli R, Kirkby E, Stoffel JT, Wilt TJ. Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): AUA Guideline Amendment 2023. J Urol. 2024 Jan;211(1):11-19. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003698. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
- Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Galvao DA, Pinto BM, Irwin ML, Wolin KY, Segal RJ, Lucia A, Schneider CM, von Gruenigen VE, Schwartz AL; American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Jul;42(7):1409-26. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112.
- Anderson D, Kumar D, Divya D, Zepeda JL, Razzak AN, Hasoon J, Viswanath O, Kaye AD, Urits I. Mental Health in Non-Oncologic Urology Patients. Health Psychol Res. 2022 Sep 23;10(3):38352. doi: 10.52965/001c.38352. eCollection 2022.
- Lingzhi S, Zhang H, Luo Y. The Impact of Self-Management Abilities, Sleep Quality, and Anxiety on the Well-Being of Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. J Patient Exp. 2025 May 7;12:23743735251341726. doi: 10.1177/23743735251341726. eCollection 2025.
- Pietrzyk B, Olszanecka-Glinianowicz M, Owczarek A, Gabryelewicz T, Almgren-Rachtan A, Prajsner A, Chudek J. Depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Mar;47(3):431-40. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-0920-5. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
- Liu X, Ma K, Yang L, Peng Z, Song P, Liu Z, Zhou J, Yu Y, Dong Q. The relationship between depression and benign prostatic hyperplasia in middle-aged and elderly men in India: a large-scale population study. BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 3;23(1):2152. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17027-2.
- Koh JS, Ko HJ, Wang SM, Cho KJ, Kim JC, Lee SJ, Pae CU. The Relationship between Depression, Anxiety, Somatization, Personality and Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Psychiatry Investig. 2015 Apr;12(2):268-73. doi: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.2.268. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
- Assmus MA, Lee MS, Helon J, Krambeck AE. Improving communication of post-holmium laser enucleation of the prostate recovery using a surgeon-patient handout. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 Nov;16(11):E533-E538. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7911.
- Dijkstra-Eshuis J, Van den Bos TW, Splinter R, Bevers RF, Zonneveld WC, Putter H, Pelger RC, Voorham-van der Zalm PJ. Effect of preoperative pelvic floor muscle therapy with biofeedback versus standard care on stress urinary incontinence and quality of life in men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomised control trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Feb;34(2):144-50. doi: 10.1002/nau.22523. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
- Alwaal A, Awad M, Boggs N, Kuzbel J, Snoad B. Sexual Health Inventory for Men Questionnaire as a Screening Method for Erectile Dysfunction in a General Urology Clinic. Sex Med. 2020 Dec;8(4):660-663. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
- Bhomi KK, Subedi N, Panta PP. Correlation of Visual Prostate Symptom Score with International Prostate Symptom Score and Uroflowmetry Parameters in Nepalese Male Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2017 Apr-Jun;56(206):217-220.
- Kortum P, Acemyan CZ, Oswald FL. Is It Time to Go Positive? Assessing the Positively Worded System Usability Scale (SUS). Hum Factors. 2021 Sep;63(6):987-998. doi: 10.1177/0018720819881556. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
- van der Willik EM, Meuleman Y, Prantl K, van Rijn G, Bos WJW, van Ittersum FJ, Bart HAJ, Hemmelder MH, Dekker FW. Patient-reported outcome measures: selection of a valid questionnaire for routine symptom assessment in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease - a four-phase mixed methods study. BMC Nephrol. 2019 Sep 2;20(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1521-9.
- Collin C, Bellas N, Haddock P, Wagner J. Pre-Operative Education Classes Prior to Robotic Prostatectomy Benefit Both Patients and Clinicians. Urol Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;35(6):281-5.
- Ocampo-Trujillo A, Carbonell-Gonzalez J, Martinez-Blanco A, Diaz-Hung A, Munoz CA, Ramirez-Velez R. Pre-operative training induces changes in the histomorphometry and muscle function of the pelvic floor in patients with indication of radical prostatectomy. Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Jul-Aug;38(6):378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.10.009. Epub 2014 Jan 16. English, Spanish.
- Cole E, Hopman W, Kawakami J. High resolution analysis of wait times and factors affecting surgical expediency. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011 Feb;5(1):13-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.09149.
- Patel MI, Yao J, Hirschhorn AD, Mungovan SF. Preoperative pelvic floor physiotherapy improves continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2013 Oct;20(10):986-92. doi: 10.1111/iju.12099. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
- Tibaek S, Klarskov P, Lund Hansen B, Thomsen H, Andresen H, Schmidt Jensen C, Niemann Olsen M. Pelvic floor muscle training before transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized, controlled, blinded study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007;41(4):329-34. doi: 10.1080/00365590601183584.
- Milios JE, Ackland TR, Green DJ. Pelvic floor muscle training in radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial of the impacts on pelvic floor muscle function and urinary incontinence. BMC Urol. 2019 Nov 15;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0546-5.
- Roper C, Slade A, Caras R, Shelton T, Rivera M. Ejaculatory and erectile function outcomes following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Prostate. 2024 Jun;84(9):791-796. doi: 10.1002/pros.24697. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
- Hueber PA, Zorn KC. Canadian trend in surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia and laser therapy from 2007-2008 to 2011-2012. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Sep-Oct;7(9-10):E582-6. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.203.
- Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A, Suardi N, Briganti A, Zanoni M, Valenti S, Vavassori I, Rigatti P. Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center, prospective, randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1926-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000140501.68841.a1.
- Elmansy H, Baazeem A, Kotb A, Badawy H, Riad E, Emran A, Elhilali M. Holmium laser enucleation versus photoselective vaporization for prostatic adenoma greater than 60 ml: preliminary results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2576. Epub 2012 May 15.
- Kuntz RM, Ahyai S, Lehrich K, Fayad A. Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients. J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1012-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000136218.11998.9e.
- Chen YB, Chen Q, Wang Z, Peng YB, Ma LM, Zheng DC, Cai ZK, Li WJ, Ma LH. A prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate based on a 2-year followup. J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):217-22. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.087. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
- Schroeck FR, Hollingsworth JM, Kaufman SR, Hollenbeck BK, Wei JT. Population based trends in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1837-41. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.049. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
- Roehrborn CG. The epidemiology of acute urinary retention in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Rev Urol. 2001 Fall;3(4):187-92.
- Tolani MA, Suleiman A, Awaisu M, Abdulaziz MM, Lawal AT, Bello A. Acute urinary tract infection in patients with underlying benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Jul 9;36:169. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.169.21038. eCollection 2020.
- Creta M, Russo GI, Bhojani N, Drake MJ, Gratzke C, Peyronnet B, Roehrborn C, Tikkinen KAO, Cornu JN, Fusco F. Bladder Outlet Obstruction Relief and Symptom Improvement Following Medical and Surgical Therapies for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 2024 Oct;86(4):315-326. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.031. Epub 2024 May 14.
- Park S, Ryu JM, Lee M. Quality of Life in Older Adults with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jun 4;8(2):158. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020158.
- Speakman M, Kirby R, Doyle S, Ioannou C. Burden of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) - focus on the UK. BJU Int. 2015 Apr;115(4):508-19. doi: 10.1111/bju.12745. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
- Ganesan V, Agarwal D. Medical Advancements in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatments. Curr Urol Rep. 2024 May;25(5):93-98. doi: 10.1007/s11934-024-01199-4. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
- Foo KT. Pathophysiology of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Urol. 2017 Jul;4(3):152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
- Maserejian NN, Chen S, Chiu GR, Wager CG, Kupelian V, Araujo AB, McKinlay JB. Incidence of lower urinary tract symptoms in a population-based study of men and women. Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):560-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
- Liu D, Li C, Li Y, Zhou L, Li J, Wang Y, Wan X, Zhou L, Wang L. Benign prostatic hyperplasia burden comparison between China and United States based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3629-3634. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04658-8. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- University of Calgary (RSO1020497)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
-
San Carlo di Nancy HospitalElesta S.R.L.CompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy With Outflow Obstruction | Prostate HyperplasiaItaly
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia
-
St. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonOntario Ministry of Health and Long Term CareCompletedBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaCanada
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) | Benign Prostatic Enlargement (BPE)Italy
-
Beni-Suef UniversityRecruitingBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Acute Urinary Retention | Benign Prostatic ObstructionEgypt
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedProstatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic, Czechia, Sweden
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign | Prostatic Hypertrophy | Prostatic Hypertrophy, Benign | Adenoma, Prostatic | Prostatic Adenoma | RezumDominican Republic
-
South Valley UniversityRecruitingBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Symptomatic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Requiring Surgical Resection | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow ObstructionEgypt
-
IMBiotechnologies Ltd.CompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic HypertrophyCanada
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. MatteoCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia | Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy With Outflow ObstructionItaly
Clinical Trials on Comprehensive Prehabilitation Programming
-
The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRecruitingBladder Cancer | Hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) Malignancy | Ovarian Cancer (OvCa) | Kidney CancersUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteNot yet recruitingDevelopmental Disability | Intellectual DisabilitiesUnited States
-
University of AlbertaRecruitingLiver Disease | Cirrhosis, Liver | Liver Transplant SurgeryCanada
-
University of PennsylvaniaNot yet recruiting
-
Thomas KöglspergerUniversity Hospital Muenster; Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf; Universitätsklinikum... and other collaboratorsCompletedParkinson Disease | Telemedicine | Deep Brain StimulationGermany
-
SGX Nova LLCCompletedChronic Back PainUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingSystemic Lupus ErythematosusEgypt
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedSurgery | Thoracic Diseases | Gastrointestinal Disease | Preoperative Care | Gynecologic Disease | Immune System and Related Disorders | Urological DiseaseUnited States
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...RecruitingParkinson Disease | Deep Brain Stimulation | ImagingNetherlands
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterThoratec CorporationCompleted