Clinical Utility of ClarityDX Prostate

April 14, 2025 updated by: Nanostics

Establishing the Clinical Utility of ClarityDX Prostate

ClarityDX Prostate builds upon the utility of total and free PSA as well as simple clinical features in a decision support model to determine a patient's risk of having clinically significant prostate cancer. The highly accurate ClarityDX Prostate risk score enables clinicians and patients to collectively make more informed decisions regarding the appropriateness of subsequent imaging or biopsy procedures. The clinical pathway aligns with the Canadian Urological Association (CUA) to use adjunctive strategies to better stratify risk of clinically significant prostate cancer.

ClarityDX Prostate consists of four separate models that can be used depending on the information available:

  1. ClarityDX Prostate. This model incorporates the patient's total PSA and free PSA levels as well as the age of the patient and whether they have had a previous negative biopsy.
  2. ClarityDX Prostate + DRE. This model incorporates ClarityDX Prostate + DRE (normal or abnormal DRE findings).
  3. ClarityDX Prostate + MRI. This model incorporates ClarityDX Prostate + MRI (PI-RADS score and prostate volume as determined from an mpMRI scan).
  4. ClarityDX Prostate + MRI + DRE. This model incorporates ClarityDX Prostate + MRI + DRE.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical utility of ClarityDX Prostate on in reducing further healthcare utilization for men identified to be at risk of prostate cancer.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

  • Assess the effect of ClarityDX Prostate on the proportion of negative biopsies and biopsies diagnosing Gleason Grade (GG)<2.
  • Measure the difference in MRI numbers between the test and control groups.
  • Evaluate the effect of ClarityDX Prostate on the prioritization of healthcare services to participants with high-risk of having clinically significant prostate cancer.
  • Infer the potential to use ClarityDX Prostate for prostate cancer screening to inform urology referral.
  • Perform a health economics assessment and cost-benefit analysis for the use of ClarityDX Prostate.

This is a prospective, randomized, two-armed clinical utility study that will enroll participants referred to urology clinics for suspicion of prostate cancer. The arms of the study are ClarityDX Prostate and Standard of Care (SOC).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

When stratifying patients for prostate cancer, it is ideal to avoid delay in treating high-risk participants that do require a biopsy, while avoiding unnecessary procedures in low-risk patients. The purpose of this study is to investigate in a real-world setting whether the use of ClarityDX Prostate would further reduce potentially unnecessary healthcare utilization of men referred to urology clinics with suspicion of prostate cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1074

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Prostate Cancer Centre
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Viana Dayhimi
          • Phone Number: 403-943-8888
        • Contact:
          • M Eric Hyndman, MD, PhD, FRCSC
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 1Z1
        • Recruiting
        • Kipnes Urology Centre
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Adam Kinnaird, MD, PhD, FRCSC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males ≥ 18 years of age
  2. Referred to urology for suspicion of prostate cancer
  3. No prior prostate cancer diagnosis
  4. Willing to participate in the study
  5. Availability for cancer care in the jurisdiction of recruitment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unwilling to participate in the study
  2. Unable to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: The control
Control/Standard of Care arm- ClarityDX Prostate will be run for these participants. Participants and healthcare providers will be blinded to the results report and participants will be considered for prostate MRI/advanced imaging and /or biopsy based on standard clinical criteria. The results of the ClarityDX Prostate will be unblinded to the study teams at the 12 months follow-up visit. The study team will then share the test results with the participant's health care team to assess whether there is a need to change the participant's care path.
ClarityDX Prostate will be run for the control participants. Participants (and healthcare team) in the control arm will be blinded to the ClarityDX Prostate results and will be considered for prostate MRI/advanced imaging and/or biopsy based on standard of care criteria. The result of the ClarityDX Prostate will be unblinded to study teams at the 12 months follow-up visit (± 2 months). The study team will then share the test results with the participant's health care team to assess whether there is a need to change the participant's care path.
Experimental: ClarityDX Prostate
The report will be shared with the healthcare team of participants randomized into the ClarityDX Prostate arm before the healthcare team decides whether to perform an MRI/advanced imaging and/or biopsy.
The ClarityDX Prostate report will be shared with the healthcare team of participants randomized into ClarityDX Prostate arm before the healthcare team decides whether to perform an MRI/advanced imaging and/or biopsy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who receive biopsy and are not diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer
Time Frame: 12 months
'Not diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer' refers to biopsies that show no cancer or clinically insignificant cancer
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Proportion of patients who undergo biopsy
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Time from first urologist consultation to clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis
Time Frame: 12 months
Time in days from seeing urologist for the first time to getting diagnosed with cancer
12 months
Number of biopsies deferred
Time Frame: 12 months
A biopsy deferred is a biopsy that was ordered by the physicians but was not performed
12 months
Inferred usability of ClarityDX Prostate for prostate cancer screening prior to urology referral
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Inferred reduction in referrals to urology by family physicians as a result of a low-Risk Score from ClarityDX Prostate
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Comparison of associated healthcare costs with and without the use of ClarityDX Prostate
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Proportion of patients who undergo advanced imaging
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adam Kinnaird, MD PhD FRCSC, University of Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: M Eric Hyndman, MD, PhD, FRCSC, University of Calgary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 14, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on ClarityDX Prostate, blinded

Subscribe