AI-Assisted Medical Decision-Making

February 27, 2025 updated by: Kang Zhang, The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

A Cohort Study to Evaluate an Artificial Intelligence Model for Assisting Medical Decision-Making Using Real-Time Hospital-Wide Electronic Health Record Data

The study builds and applies an AI model to help doctors predict patient diagnoses and outcomes, such as survival or hospital stay. Real-time, multimodal data (labs, vital signs, history, imaging) from hospital records will be used. Patients will be tracked to compare the AI's performance with standard care. The goal is to improve diagnosis and treatment accuracy in a real-world, prospective study.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study aims to build and apply an artificial intelligence (AI) model to assist doctors in predicting patient diagnoses and outcomes, such as survival or hospital stay length. Patients will be enrolled across the hospital, and real-time, multimodal health data-including lab results, vital signs, medical history, and imaging-from electronic health records will be used. The study will follow participants to evaluate the AI model's performance against standard practice. The goal is to improve the accuracy and speed of diagnoses and treatments, enhancing patient care. This prospective study tests the model in real-world hospital settings.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50000000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
        • Contact:
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study includes all patients admitted to any hospital department, with real-time electronic health record data (e.g., labs, vital signs, history, imaging). Participants must consent to data collection.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients admitted to any department of the hospital (e.g., ICU, general wards, emergency, outpatient services) during the study period.
  2. Patients with available real-time electronic health record (EHR) data, including at least two of the following: laboratory results, vital signs, medical history, and imaging data.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients currently enrolled in another clinical trial that could interfere with data collection or outcomes of this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Hospital-Wide Patient Cohort
The intervention in this study involves an AI system that leverages multimodal data fusion to support the clinical decision-making and evaluation of diseases. Patients in this cohort will undergo standard examinations, with clinical decisions guided by the recommendations generated by the AI system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Time Frame: 1 year
AUC of the ROC curve, used to quantify diagnostic accuracy. No unit (a ratio or percentage, typically expressed as a number between 0 and 1).
1 year
Overall Hospital Resource Utilization Improvement
Time Frame: 1 year
The percentage reduction in overall hospital resource use (e.g., bed days, ICU admissions, diagnostic tests) attributed to AI-assisted decision-making, expressed as a percentage.
1 year
Population-Level Diagnostic Accuracy Enhancement
Time Frame: 1 year
The overall improvement in diagnostic accuracy across all hospital patients (e.g., percentage of correct diagnoses or reduction in misdiagnoses) facilitated by the AI model, expressed as a percentage or ratio.
1 year
System-Wide Reduction in Adverse Event Rates
Time Frame: 1 year
The percentage reduction in major adverse events (e.g., mortality, severe complications, or prolonged stays) across all hospital patients due to AI-assisted decision-making, expressed as a percentage.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Improvement in Hospital Patient Outcomes
Time Frame: 1 year
The aggregate improvement in key patient outcomes (e.g., mortality, morbidity, recovery rates) across the entire hospital population due to AI-assisted decision-making, expressed as a composite score or percentage.
1 year
Enhancement of Healthcare System Efficiency
Time Frame: 1 year
he overall improvement in hospital operational efficiency (e.g., reduced wait times, optimized resource allocation, decreased staff workload) attributed to the AI model, expressed as a percentage or qualitative rating.
1 year
Population Health Impact Score
Time Frame: 1 year
A composite score reflecting the AI model's effect on population health within the hospital's catchment area (e.g., reduced disease burden, improved chronic disease management), expressed as a standardized index or percentage change.
1 year
Long-Term Public Health Benefit Index
Time Frame: 1 year
A composite index measuring the AI model's long-term contribution to public health (e.g., reduced disease prevalence, improved life expectancy), expressed as a standardized score or percentage improvement.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AI Prediction

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Real-world Study

Clinical Trials on AI-associated strategy

Subscribe