Perioperative Use of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Anesthetic Management of Spinal Surgery in Children

April 29, 2026 updated by: Maxim Monastirniy, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia
Testing the hypothesis that in children undergoing spinal surgery, ESP-block will increase the time to emergency anesthesia in the postoperative period compared with intravenous lidocaine infusion.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Interventions for congenital or acquired spinal anomalies are usually voluminous and traumatic, which causes a high level of pain stimulation during the perioperative period. Thus, the problem of pain in spinal surgery is extremely important and is one of the main components of successful treatment.

Combined anesthesia using regional techniques (local anesthesia is added to general anesthesia) can be a significant alternative to performing traditional combined anesthesia with high doses of opioids (narcotic painkillers with undesirable side effects). It allows you to follow the principles of multimodal analgesia, with the possibility of rapid recovery of the patient in the postoperative period.

The use of ESPB (spinal straightening plane blockade) in vertebrology has currently been studied only in adult patients. ESPB is effective and safe for postoperative pain relief after lumbar spine surgery. ESPB can reduce the consumption of opioids (narcotic painkillers) after surgery, increase patient satisfaction, and shorten the length of hospitalization.

Currently, the use of the local anesthetic lidocaine as a medicinal agent for intravenous infusion in children, as an alternative to narcotic anesthesia, is also being actively discussed.

A large number of studies indicate the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine infusion for perioperative anesthesia in adult patients. In pediatric practice, this technique is not widely used due to the lack of evidence base for efficacy and safety.

Intravenous infusion of lidocaine consistently improves analgesic parameters in the adult and pediatric populations in the first 24 hours, while an effective decrease in the consumption of narcotic painkillers is noted by 48 hours.

Intravenous lidocaine has demonstrated antineuropathic, antihyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory effects and is a new method. Numerous studies in adults have demonstrated the beneficial effects of intravenous lidocaine, including improved pain relief with reduced postoperative use of narcotic painkillers, earlier activation, and shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit. To date, the dose ranges studied in the pediatric population have not been associated with serious side effects, and current evidence suggests that intravenous lidocaine administration will be well tolerated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

68

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sankt-Peterburg
      • Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, Russia, 190121
        • SaintPetersburgSU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Elective surgery on the thoracic and lumbosacral spine. 2. Signed informed consent to participate in the study; 3. Age 3-17 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications to the use of local anesthetics;
  2. Operations on the cervical spine;
  3. Contraindications to performing ESPB;
  4. The patient's refusal to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Blockade of the plane straightening the spine (Erector Spinae Plane Block, ESPB).
The patient will undergo an ESP blockade under the control of ultrasound during the implementation of anesthetic support. A local anesthetic will be injected into the fascial space of the muscles straightening the spine: ropivacaine 0.375%, 3 mg / kg, on both sides.
Active Comparator: IV Lidocaine
During the implementation of anesthetic support, the patient will receive a constant intravenous infusion of lidocaine: a loading dose of 1.5 mg/kg/ h (1 hour), followed by an infusion of 1 mg/kg/h for 24 hours during the perioperative period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time before emergency pain relief (opioid).
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Time before emergency pain relief (opioid).
24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the need for opioids in the postoperative period within 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours
the need for opioids in the postoperative period within 24 hours (of the start of anesthesia)
24 hours
assessment of intraoperative analgesia quality (pulse)
Time Frame: during surgery
pulse monitoring during surgery
during surgery
assessment of intraoperative analgesia quality (BP)
Time Frame: during surgery
Blood pressure monitoring during surgery
during surgery
Complications associated with intravenous lidocaine infusion (general toxic effects on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems)
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours
Complications associated with spinal straightening plane block (ESPB)
Time Frame: 24 hours
Complications: neurological, bleeding, hematoma, infection.
24 hours
pain level assessment using pain scales (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale)
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively

use Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (postoperative period)

The Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale is used for general assessment of pain intensity in adult patients and children over 3 years of age.

The scale consists of 6 faces, ranging from laughing (no pain) to crying (unbearable pain).

Each face corresponds to a certain number of points:

0 points - a happy smiling face, means no pain (No Hurt); 2 points - a slight smile on the face, means slight soreness (Hurts Little Bit); 4 points - neutral facial expression, means slight pain (Hurts Little More); 6 points - facial expression with slightly furrowed eyebrows, means average pain (Hurts Even More); 8 points - a facial expression with heavily furrowed eyebrows means severe pain (Hurts a Whole Lot); 10 points - a crying, unhappy expression means excessive unbearable pain (Hurts Worst).

24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maxim Sergeevich Monastirniy, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

By a reasonable request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe