Young Stroke Service Deep Phenotyping: Exploring Recovery in Young Adult Survivors of Stroke

The Investigators are running a small, early-phase research study across several hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. The study will involve up to 100 young adults between the ages of 18 and 55 who have had a stroke. The goal is to test how practical it is to carry out a detailed health assessment process-called "deep phenotyping"-with this group.

This process involves collecting a wide range of information and samples from stroke survivors to better understand each participant's condition. The Investigators will look at how well this approach works in practice, including how easy it is to use, whether it's done consistently, and how acceptable it is to participants.

At the same time, the Investigators will also explore how different factors-such as biological markers (biomarkers), age, sex, type of stroke, lifestyle, and environment-might be related to stroke recovery. This pilot study will prepare for larger studies in the future.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Young adult stroke survivors within 3 months of stroke

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Between 18 and 55 years.
  2. Within one month of acute stroke confirmed with standard of care brain imaging or clinical diagnosis or for those for whom recruitment <1 month of stroke is not possible they may be recruited to participate within 3-months of stroke

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe, intercurrent or progressive illness likely to EITHER

    1. Have a prognosis for survival under 24 months; OR
    2. In the opinion of the investigator will mask the importance to the individual participant data (e.g. severe MS, dementia, etc)
  2. Major psychiatric condition requiring medical intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Young adult stroke survivors (age 18 to 55 inclusive)

The deep phenotyping observational study observes young adult stroke recovery trajectories and will also explore potential recovery biomarkers via: advanced MRI imaging; samples including blood, saliva, urine and hair stored for future analysis that may include (but is not limited to) proteomics, genomics and cortisol; and, a PET scan sub study involving ~20 participants (additional inclusion criteria) exploring the association of reactive astrogliosis with recovery outcomes using the experimental Positron Emission Tomography 18F-SMBT-1 tracer (AU TGA CTN in place).

Associations with personal and environmental factors including: physical activity and sleep quality via device (Actigraph and Somfit) and self-report; exposures such as home and work environments, diet, socioeconomic status, and dental health; quality of life, resilience, and locus of control.

Monitor healthcare utilisation, changes in medication and medical condition, participant experience and response to the assessments.

Other Names:
  • Deep phenotyping

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementability (feasibility, fidelity and acceptability)
Time Frame: From enrolment to the six month assessment visit

Evaluation of the implementability will include assessment of the protocol's:

  • Feasibility, e.g.

    • Recruitment rate
    • Retention
    • Proportion of participants screened that enrolled
    • Safety via adverse events
  • Fidelity, e.g.

    • Proportion of assessments attended
    • Proportion of data collected and biobanked or analysed
  • Acceptability, e.g. o Participant acceptability surveys
From enrolment to the six month assessment visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: 6 months

FSS: A 9-item (or 7-item with the first two items removed) measure of fatigue impairment.

Measured at baseline (<1month post stroke), 3- and 6-months post stroke.

6 months
Visual Analogue Scale to Assess Fatigue (VAS-F)
Time Frame: Assessment at <1, 3- and 6-months post stroke
18-item visual analogue scale of fatigue and energy items.
Assessment at <1, 3- and 6-months post stroke
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) is a multidimensional scale that reports physical, psychological and cognitive aspects of fatigue
Time Frame: 6 months
A multidimensional 21-item measure that evaluates physical, psychological and cognitive aspects of fatigue. Measured at baseline (<1month post stroke), 3- and 6-months post stroke.
6 months
Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: 6 months
Assessment to evaluate cognitive domains such as visuospatial memory, auditory verbal learning, visual attention, task switching, verbal fluency, and verbal short-term and working memory. Assessment <1-month, 3- and 6-months post stroke.
6 months
modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time Frame: 6 months
Single-item evaluation of global disability. Assessed at <1-month, 3- and 6-months post stroke
6 months
10 metre walk test (10mWT)
Time Frame: 6 months
Gait assessment, evaluated <1-month, 3- and 6-months post stroke
6 months
Visual Analogue Scale of the Impact of Fatigue on Communication Ability
Time Frame: 6 months

Visual analogue scale (0-10) assessing the impact of fatigue on communication ability.

Measured at baseline (<1month post stroke), 3- and 6-months post stroke.

6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent Thijs, MD, PhD, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 19, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Sharing of individual patient data will be considered upon reasonable request by qualified researchers with appropriate IRB/HREC approval

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Observational Cohort

3
Subscribe