Association Between Qmax/eGFR Ratio and LUTS Severity in Men Over 40

August 30, 2025 updated by: Tarik Emre Sener, Marmara University

The Role of Qmax/eGFR Ratio in Assessing Symptom Severity and QoL in Men Over 40 With LUTS

This study will look at how well a measure called the Qmax/eGFR ratio is related to the severity of urination problems in men over the age of 40. Qmax is a test that shows how fast a person can urinate, and eGFR is a number that reflects kidney function. Men who have urinary symptoms will be asked to do a urine flow test, a blood test, and fill out a questionnaire about their symptoms and quality of life. We will study if there is a link between the Qmax/eGFR ratio and how severe their symptoms are. The results may help doctors better understand how kidney and urinary function are related in men with these problems.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective observational study aims to explore the clinical relevance of the Qmax/eGFR ratio in men over 40 years of age presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Qmax, derived from uroflowmetry, reflects bladder emptying function, while eGFR represents renal filtration capacity. While both parameters are routinely measured in clinical practice, their combined predictive or associative value in LUTS severity has not been well defined.

Participants will undergo standard non-invasive assessments including uroflowmetry, serum creatinine testing (for eGFR calculation), and will complete the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire. The IPSS includes both total symptom score and quality of life (QoL) component. The primary objective is to evaluate the correlation between the Qmax/eGFR ratio and IPSS total score. Secondary objectives include the relationship between Qmax/eGFR and QoL scores, as well as analysis based on prostate volume categories.

This study seeks to identify whether the Qmax/eGFR ratio may serve as a composite marker reflecting both voiding efficiency and renal function in the clinical assessment of LUTS, potentially supporting more individualized decision-making in urological practice.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Male outpatients aged 40 years or older who present with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) to the urology clinic. Participants will be evaluated during routine clinical visits and must be capable of completing symptom questionnaires and undergoing non-invasive tests such as uroflowmetry and blood sampling. The study population is drawn from a single tertiary academic medical center.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients aged 40 years or older presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Willing and able to undergo uroflowmetry and blood testing
  • Able to complete the IPSS questionnaire, including the QoL item
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73m²

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of urological surgery (e.g., prostatectomy, bladder surgery)
  • Diagnosed or suspected prostate cancer
  • Active urinary tract infection (based on clinical symptoms or urinalysis)
  • Neurological conditions affecting bladder function (e.g., Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury)
  • Presence of an indwelling urinary catheter at enrollment
  • eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m²
  • Inability to perform uroflowmetry or complete clinical evaluations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Men Over 40 With LUTS
Male patients aged 40 years or older presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), who undergo uroflowmetry and renal function testing, and complete the IPSS questionnaire. No interventions will be applied. This group will be prospectively observed for the association between Qmax/eGFR ratio and symptom severity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation Between Qmax/eGFR Ratio and Total IPSS Score
Time Frame: At baseline
This outcome assesses the statistical correlation between the Qmax/eGFR ratio and the total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis will be used to evaluate the relationship between the ratio and LUTS severity.
At baseline
Correlation Between Qmax/eGFR Ratio and IPSS Quality of Life Subscore
Time Frame: At baseline
This outcome evaluates the correlation between the Qmax/eGFR ratio and the IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) subscore, aiming to assess the association between voiding/renal parameters and patient-perceived well-being.
At baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Factors Associated With Qmax/eGFR Ratio
Time Frame: At baseline
This outcome aims to identify clinical factors that may influence the Qmax/eGFR ratio in men over 40 with lower urinary tract symptoms. Variables to be analyzed may include age, prostate volume, voided volume, and average flow rate (Qave), among others. Multivariable analysis will be performed to explore independent associations.
At baseline
Association of Clinical Variables With Qmax/eGFR Ratio
Time Frame: At baseline
This analysis will identify clinical parameters independently associated with Qmax/eGFR ratio, including age, prostate volume, voided volume, and average flow rate (Qave). Multivariable regression models will be used to determine significant predictors.
At baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be publicly shared due to the observational design, single-center setting, and the absence of genomic or identifying information. However, anonymized data may be made available upon reasonable scientific request and after appropriate ethical and institutional approvals.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Function

3
Subscribe