Stimulating Specific Brain Areas (VOP/VIM) With Electricity to Improve Movement and Muscle Control

November 5, 2025 updated by: Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez

VOP/VIM Direct Electrical Stimulation Increases Motor Cortex Excitability and Motor Output

In this study the investigators aim to enroll patients scheduled to undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation for movement disorders for intra-operative testing. In addition to standard-of-care surgical procedure to implant deep brain stimulation electrode leads, participants will also be stimulated and recorded from cortical areas by a temporary strip electrode (1X6) in the subdural space. The electrodes will be connected to external stimulators and a series of experiments will be performed to assess effects of the DBS on movement quality and electrophysiology measures. Results of this study will elucidate the biological mechanisms related to deep brain stimulation in modulating motor and speech function in patients with abnormal movement disorders.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study the investigators aim to enroll patients for intra-operative testing. Specifically, the investigators will recruit patients already undergoing DBS implantation for movement disorders. In addition to standard-of-care subcortical mapping using micro-electrode recording (MER) and macro-stimulation mapping during DBS placement, cortical local field potentials (LFPs) will be simultaneously recorded from primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortical areas by placement of a temporary strip electrode (1X6) in the subdural space. Appropriate localization of this grid over M1 and S1 will be confirmed by the so-called phase-reversal of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). Once M1 is localized, the strip electrode over M1 will be used to produce motor evoked potentials to contralateral hand muscles from direct cortical stimulation (DCMEPs). The stimulation threshold of the DCMEPs will be used as a direct measure of the excitability of the cortical spinal tract and compared with and without stimulation of the VOP/VIM nuclei. Cortical and subcortical LFPs will be obtained alongside electromyographic (EMG) data while the patient performs contralateral upper extremity movement tasks measuring velocity, grip strength, and strength modulation and while the patient perform a variety of articulation exercises. Along with the DCMEP stimulation thresholds, these parameters of motor output will be obtained both with and without VOP/VIM stimulation to assess for stimulation induced potentiation of motor output.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Cierra Clark, MS
  • Phone Number: 240-441-4216
  • Email: cic27@pitt.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Elvira Pirondini, PhD
  • Phone Number: 412-636-0595
  • Email: elvirap@pitt.edu

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Recruiting
        • University of Pittsburgh
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Essential tremor patients who are scheduled to undergo deep brain stimulation surgery at UPMC Presbyterian with asymmetric essential tremor symptoms will be included, with the tested limb corresponding to the least affected arm to better approximate normal function. These patients are implanted bilaterally regardless of symptom laterality, as the natural history of essential tremor indicates eventual bilateral symptoms.
  • Parkinson's Disease patients who are scheduled to undergo deep brain stimulation surgery at UPMC Presbyterian with a history of Parkinson's Disease will also be recruited for intra-operative stimulation of their STN-targeted implants, to assess if VIM/VOP has high specificity for improving motor output.

Confirmation that subjects' terms of insurance coverage for their standard of care procedure will not be altered by study enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded from the study if there is any seizure history, to avoid the increased epileptogenic risk of intraoperative stimulation.
  • Patients with significant bilateral tremor that precludes completion of motor tasks.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Direct Cortical Stimulation and Deep Brain Stimulation of the Motor Thalamus
Individuals undergoing deep brain stimulation device implanted in the motor thalamus for movement disorders treatment. Some of whom may also sustain speech, swallowing, and motor deficits.
All participants enrolled will undergo implantation of deep brain stimulation electrode leads for treatment of movement disorders. In addition to standard-of-care subcortical mapping using micro-electrode recording (MER) and macrostimulation mapping during DBS placement, cortical local field potentials (LFPs) will be simultaneously recorded from primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortical areas by placement of a temporary strip electrode (1X6) in the subdural space. The strip electrode over M1 will be used to produce motor evoked potentials to contralateral hand muscles from direct cortical stimulation (DCMEPs). Cortical and subcortical LFPs will be obtained alongside electromyographic (EMG) data while the patient performs contralateral upper extremity movement tasks and a variety of articulation exercises.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Electromyography Activity
Time Frame: 14 days
The investigators will record electromyography activity (EMG) to measure the motor evoked potentials of upper limb and facial muscles. At the end of the procedures these needles and/or the superficial adhesive electrodes will be removed. Based on the preliminary data, the investigators will consider the number of participants with at least an 18% increase in muscle activation as minimally acceptable.
14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Speech Intelligibility
Time Frame: 14 days
The investigators will use the Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech (AIDS) to assess the quality of communication and intelligibility of speech at both word- and sentence-level. Intelligibility is calculated as the percentage of words correctly identified in the single-word task, and as the percentage of correctly transcribed words and speech rate (in words per minute) in the sentence task. Based on the preliminary data, the investigators will consider the number of participants with an improvement of 5% correctly transcribed to be minimally acceptable.
14 days
Dexterity of Articulation AMRs
Time Frame: 14 days
The investigators will measure dexterity of articulation by alternating motion rates (AMRs) of the repetitive plosive sound (pah, tah, and kah). Based on the preliminary data, the investigators will consider the number of participants with an improvement of 10% in the rate to be minimally acceptable.
14 days
Dexterity of Articulation SMRs
Time Frame: 14 days
The investigators will measure dexterity of articulation by sequential motion rates (SMRs) of the repetitive plosive sound (pah, tah, and kah). Based on the preliminary data, the investigators will consider the number of participants with an improvement of 10% in the rate to be minimally acceptable.
14 days
Facial Muscle Motor Function - Range of Motion
Time Frame: 14 days
The investigators will use electromyography (EMG) testing to measure range of motion produced by the subject during isometric facial movements (e.g. smile, tongue out, puckered lips, and open-close mouth). Based on the preliminary data, the investigators will consider the number of participants with an increase of 50% in ROM as a minimally acceptable improvement.
14 days
Facial Muscle Motor Function - Muscle Strength
Time Frame: 14 days
The investigators will use electromyography (EMG) testing to measure muscle strength produced by the subject during isometric facial movements (e.g. smile, tongue out, puckered lips, and open-close mouth). Amplitude of movement will be calculated by Area-Under-the-Curve with units of uV^2/ms. Based on the preliminary data, the investigators will consider the number of participants with an increase of 50% in ROM as a minimally acceptable improvement in muscle strength.
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, MD, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification, may be shared with other researchers for the purpose of data analysis and collaboration.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available at the end of the trial upon publication of the first manuscript. Estimation is 7 years from enrollment of the first participant.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data must be directly requested from the PI and will be shared upon completion of the necessary data-sharing agreement to protect confidential patient information.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Direct cortical stimulation and deep brain stimulation of motor thalamus

Subscribe