Assessing the Efficacy and Impact of Ambient AI Scribes in Healthcare

August 2, 2025 updated by: Scott Adams, University of Saskatchewan

Assessing the Efficacy and Impact of Ambient AI Scribes in Healthcare: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the impacts of ambient AI scribes on the workload and burnout in physicians who see patients in a clinic setting at least twice in a week, as well as the impacts on patient-physician interaction.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the impact of ambient AI scribe use on physician workload and burnout?
  • What is the impact of ambient AI scribe use on quality of patient-physician interaction?

Researchers will compare the group of physicians using the ambient AI scribes to the group not using ambient AI scribes to see if there are any significant differences.

Participants randomly assigned to Group A will make use of the AI scribe and participants randomly assigned to Group B will not use any AI scribe for the 10 working day duration of the study. They will be asked to complete a survey assessing workload and burnout immediately prior to the commencement of the study and at the end of each week of the study or 5 full working days for part time physicians. They will also invite their patients to complete a survey assessing their experience after each clinical interaction.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physicians from family medicine or any specialty
  • Physicians who regularly see patients in a clinic setting at least 2 days per week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physicians who are planning to leave their practice during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ambient AI Scribe Users
This group will make use of the ambient AI scribe in their clinical visits to generate clinical notes for them over the duration of the study.
Software that records audio of a clinical interaction and generates a clinical note.
No Intervention: Non-Ambient AI Users
This group will continue to generate their own clinical notes without the use of ambient AI scribes over the duration of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician Workload as Measured Using the NASA Task Load Index
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of the study at 10 working days.
The NASA-TLX is separated into six 100-point scales with 5-point steps that assess mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration. A higher score indicates that they feel a greater degree of each of the domains.
From enrolment to the end of the study at 10 working days.
Physician Burnout as Measured Using the MBI - HSS (MP)
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of the study at 10 working days.
The MBI-HSS (MP) is created specifically for medical personnel and assesses emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items), and personal accomplishment (8 items).
From enrolment to the end of the study at 10 working days.
Quality of Patient-Physician Interaction As Measured Using the CARE Patient Feedback Measure Domain of "Really Listening"
Time Frame: Throughout study completion at 10 working days.
The CARE measure consists of a series of 10 questions asked of patients with our focus on the domain of whether the physician was "really listening (paying close attention to what you were saying; not looking at the notes or computer as you were talking)" scored on a 5 point Likert scale.
Throughout study completion at 10 working days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Documentation Quality as Measured by the PDQI-9
Time Frame: From enrollment to the completion of the study at 10 working days.
Documentation is scored by two blinded reviewers on a scale from 1-5 (with 5 indicating a higher quality) across 9 domains: up-to-date, accurate, thorough, useful, organized, comprehensible, succinct, synthesized, and internally consistent.
From enrollment to the completion of the study at 10 working days.
Time Spent Within the EMR for Each Clinical Note
Time Frame: From enrollment to the completion of the study at 10 working days.
The amount of time spent within the EMR for each clinical note and the amount of time spent editing the note on the ambient AI platform will be tracked using EMR logs and time-tracking tools.
From enrollment to the completion of the study at 10 working days.
Time Spent in the EMR After Hours
Time Frame: From enrollment to the completion of the study at 10 working days.
The amount of time spent using the EMR after regular working hours will be measured using EMR logs and time-tracking tools.
From enrollment to the completion of the study at 10 working days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott Adams, MD, PhD, MEd, FRCPC, University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physician Burnout

Clinical Trials on Ambient AI Scribe

Subscribe