WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department (WINDSURFER)

May 5, 2026 updated by: Henry Wang, MD, Ohio State University

The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine the best initial non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) strategy for adults who present to the emergency department with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, a condition in which blood oxygen levels are dangerously low and require urgent treatment. This study compares two commonly used non-invasive respiratory support strategies to evaluate their effectiveness and safety, based on important patient outcomes during hospitalization, including survival, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and the duration of respiratory support. Participants will be randomly assigned (with an equal chance) to receive one of the following treatments:

  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV): Oxygen delivered under pressure through a face mask.
  • High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO): Oxygen delivered at high-flow through a specially designed nasal cannula placed in the nostrils.

Researchers will compare the two treatment strategies using a hierarchical assessment of major pulmonary outcomes, including:

  • Hospital survival
  • Days on mechanical ventilation
  • Duration of non-invasive respiratory support

As part of the study, researchers will collect:

  • Blood and urine samples
  • Physiologic measurements (such as chest movement measured through sensors placed on the skin)
  • Information from participants' medical records

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) is a serious medical emergency that frequently presents in the emergency department (ED) and requires immediate respiratory support to prevent further clinical deterioration. Patients with AHRF are at high risk for progression to invasive mechanical ventilation and death, and early management decisions may substantially influence outcomes.

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) is widely used as first-line therapy for AHRF. Two commonly used NIRS strategies are non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). Both modalities are accepted standards of care; however, their relative effectiveness and safety when applied early in the ED remain uncertain. Prior comparative studies have largely been conducted in intensive care settings, enrolled selected patient populations, or focused on single outcomes such as intubation or mortality. Consequently, equipoise persists regarding the optimal initial NIRS strategy for ED patients with undifferentiated AHRF.

The WINDSURFER trial (WIN ratio analysis to Determine a strategy of non-invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department) is designed to compare two strategies of non-invasive respiratory support-NIPPV and HFNO-with respect to clinically meaningful outcomes in adult ED patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

The trial is conducted at multiple hospitals participating in the NIH funded Strategies to Innovate Emergency Care Clinical Trials Network (SIREN), enabling enrollment across diverse emergency care environments.

The study enrolls adult patients early in their ED course, reflecting the population in which initial respiratory support decisions are most consequential.

Participants are randomly assigned in equal proportions to one of the two study strategies, with allocation managed centrally through a secure electronic system to ensure balance across sites.

The assigned strategy is implemented as the initial approach to non invasive respiratory support for a defined protocolized period, after which ongoing respiratory management is determined by the treating clinical team according to standard clinical practice.

Clinical data are collected from the medical record and study specific assessments to characterize baseline features, treatment course, and in hospital events. Follow up extends through hospitalization and a defined post randomization observation period to ensure complete capture of relevant clinical outcomes.

Ethical Considerations: Because AHRF is a life-threatening emergency requiring immediate intervention and patients frequently lack decision making capacity at presentation, the study is conducted under Exception From Informed Consent (EFIC) in accordance with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations (21 CFR 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure are completed prior to enrollment at each site. Participants or their Legally Authorized Representatives are informed of enrollment at the earliest feasible opportunity and may withdraw from the study at any time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Valerie L Durkalski-Mauldin, PhD
  • Phone Number: 843-876-1911
  • Email: durkalsv@musc.edu

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • OSU Wexner Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jason Bischof, MD
        • Contact:
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43203
        • Ohio State East Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jason Bischof, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory failure (AHRF), defined as:

    • [(respiratory rate ≥25 breaths/min) AND (requiring ≥6 L/min of oxygen required to maintain SpO2 ≥90%), OR SpO2:FiO2 ratio<250] OR
    • Arrival at ED on prehospital Non-Invasive Respiratory Support (NIRS).
  • Clinical need for NIRS
  • Randomization ≤2 hours after identification of need for NIRS
  • Randomization ≤6 hours of ED arrival

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Urgent need for intubation
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Respiratory arrest
  • Patient not located in the ED
  • Craniofacial anatomic features that prohibit either Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) or High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO) interface
  • Tracheostomy or laryngectomy stoma
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring >0.2mcg/kg/min of norepinepherine (or equivalent) to maintain mean arterial pressure >65mmHg
  • Pre-existing "do not resuscitate" or "do not intubate" order
  • Home use of non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation for respiratory support of a medical condition other than sleep apnea
  • Transferred from another Emergency Department
  • History of advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • History of advanced heart failure
  • Presence of opt-out identification
  • Prisoner
  • Known or apparent pregnant
  • Previous enrollment in WINDSURFER
  • A patient-specific contraindication makes one assigned study intervention unsafe

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Participants (randomized) who are experiencing acute hypoxemic respiratory failure will be placed on Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV), by face mask.
Oxygen is delivered with positive pressure through a face mask covering the nose and mouth.
Other Names:
  • NIPPV
Active Comparator: High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO)
Participants (randomized) who are experiencing acute hypoxemic respiratory failure will be placed on humidified High-Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO), delivered to the participant through a specially designed nasal cannula.
Humidified oxygen is delivered to the participant through a specially-designed nasal cannula.
Other Names:
  • HFNO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects with Major Adverse Pulmonary Event (MAPE)
Time Frame: a) Hospital Death up to 28 days after randomization b) Maximum of 28 ventilator days c) Maximum of 24 NIRS hours

Composite of:

  1. Hospital Death
  2. Ventilator Days
  3. Non-Invasive Respiratory Support (NIRS) Hours
a) Hospital Death up to 28 days after randomization b) Maximum of 28 ventilator days c) Maximum of 24 NIRS hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects with New or worsening pneumonia/pneumonitis
Time Frame: Up to hospital discharge or 7 days of randomization, whichever comes first.
Development or worsening of air-space disease, as identified by radiologist interpretation of chest x-rays and comparison with first chest x-ray.
Up to hospital discharge or 7 days of randomization, whichever comes first.
Number of Subjects with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Time Frame: Up to hospital discharge or 7 days of randomization, whichever comes first.

Development or worsening of ARDS. Berlin and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine ARDS criteria, both intubated and non-intubated patients:

  • Bilateral opacities on chest x-ray or computed tomography.
  • Decreased PaO2:FiO2 or SpO2:FiO2 ratio
  • Respiratory failure not explained by heart failure or volume overload.
Up to hospital discharge or 7 days of randomization, whichever comes first.
Number of Subjects with New or worsening shock
Time Frame: Up to hospital discharge or 72 hours of randomization, whichever comes first.
Requirement for vasopressors (>0.2 mcg/kg/min norepinephrine or equivalent) for >1 hour to maintain systolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg.
Up to hospital discharge or 72 hours of randomization, whichever comes first.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Henry E Wang, MD, MS, Ohio State University
  • Principal Investigator: Jarrod Mosier, MD, University of Arizona
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Tidswell, MD, Baystate Health
  • Principal Investigator: Lai Wei, PhD, Ohio State University
  • Study Director: William Meurer, MD, University of Michigan - Strategies to Innovate EmeRgENcy Care Clinical Trials Network (SIREN) Clinical Coordinating Center
  • Study Director: Robert Silbergleit, MD, University of Michigan - SIREN Clinical Coordinating Center
  • Principal Investigator: Valerie Durkalski-Mauldin, PhD, Medical University of South Carolina - SIREN Data Coordinating Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UG3HL175260 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • U24HL175258 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After participant enrollment and follow up have been completed and the database has been locked, the Data Coordinating Center (DCC) will prepare a de-identified dataset that will be submitted to the NHLBI data repository managed by the Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center (BioLINCC) or else where as arranged with the Institute. Requests to access the shared data after the trial is completed will be handled by the BioLINCC Coordinating Center.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After data set locked and submitted to BioLINCC.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Request to BioLINCC.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Clinical Trials on Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation

Subscribe