Effects of Virtual Reality and Traditional Exercise on Cognitive and Physical Performance in Sedentary Adults (VR-TRAD-EX)

April 28, 2026 updated by: Esranur Terzi, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University

A Comparison of Virtual Reality and Traditional Exercise Methods in Terms of Certain Physiological and Psychological Parameters

This study aimed to compare the effects of virtual reality (VR)-based exercise and traditional exercise methods on selected physiological and cognitive parameters in sedentary individuals. Sedentary lifestyles are increasingly associated with reduced physical fitness and impaired cognitive performance, including decreased concentration, slower reaction time, and reduced flexibility. While traditional exercise programs are effective, their long-term adherence may be limited due to low motivation.

Virtual reality-based exercise has emerged as an innovative approach that combines physical activity with interactive and engaging environments, potentially enhancing both motivation and cognitive engagement. Therefore, this study investigated whether VR-based exercise provides additional benefits compared to traditional exercise.

A total of 33 sedentary adults were randomly assigned to three groups: a VR exercise group, a traditional exercise group, and a control group. The intervention groups participated in structured exercise programs three times per week for eight weeks, while the control group maintained their usual lifestyle without exercise intervention.

Outcome measures included concentration, reaction time (hand and foot), balance, and flexibility, assessed before and after the intervention. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to understanding whether VR-based exercise can be used as an effective alternative to traditional exercise methods for improving both cognitive and physical performance in sedentary populations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Physical inactivity is a major public health concern associated with increased risk of chronic diseases and decreased cognitive functioning. Sedentary behavior, particularly among young adults and university students, negatively affects both physiological parameters such as flexibility and balance, and cognitive functions such as attention and reaction time. Therefore, identifying effective and engaging exercise interventions is essential.

Virtual reality (VR)-based exercise has gained attention as a novel training modality that integrates physical movement with cognitive stimulation through immersive environments. Unlike traditional exercise, VR-based programs may enhance motivation, adherence, and cognitive engagement, potentially leading to greater improvements in both physical and mental performance.

This study was designed as a randomized controlled experimental trial with a pre-test-post-test design. Participants were sedentary individuals aged 18 years and older who did not engage in regular physical activity and had no significant health problems. A total of 33 participants were randomly assigned into three groups: VR training group (n=11), traditional training group (n=11), and control group (n=11).

The intervention lasted 8 weeks, with exercise sessions performed three times per week. Each session lasted approximately 25-30 minutes and included warm-up and cool-down periods. The VR group performed exercises using VR applications via a head-mounted display system, while the traditional group performed the same exercises in a real-world environment under supervision. The control group did not participate in any structured exercise program.

Outcome measures included:

Concentration (measured via EEG-based NeuroSky device), Reaction time (hand and foot, measured using a light-based reaction system), Balance (assessed with a balance disc), Flexibility (evaluated using the sit-and-reach test).

All measurements were conducted before and after the intervention under standardized conditions. Data were analyzed using parametric statistical methods, including paired-samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA, following confirmation of normal distribution and homogeneity of variances.

The study aimed to determine whether VR-based exercise provides superior or additional benefits compared to traditional exercise in improving cognitive-motor performance and physical fitness parameters. The findings are expected to support the development of innovative exercise strategies to combat sedentary lifestyles and improve overall health outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants were selected from among individuals aged 18 and over who had not experienced any serious physical or psychological problems in the past 6 months, did not exercise regularly, did not regularly use alcohol or tobacco, and volunteered for the program.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional Exercise Training
Participants in this arm performed a structured traditional exercise program for 8 weeks, 3 days per week. The program included aerobic, strength, balance, and flexibility exercises identical in structure to the VR group but delivered in a real-world environment without virtual reality technology. Sessions included warm-up, main exercise sets, and cool-down phases under supervision.
Participants in this intervention arm completed a structured traditional exercise training program for 8 weeks, with sessions conducted 3 days per week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday). The training protocol consisted of the same exercise components as the VR group, including aerobic, strength, balance, and flexibility exercises, but performed in a real-world environment without virtual reality technology. Each session included standardized warm-up exercises, main exercise sets (such as squats, lunges, jumping, reaction drills, balance tasks, and flexibility exercises), and a cool-down period. All sessions were supervised and conducted under controlled laboratory conditions with standardized environmental settings.
Other Names:
  • Traditional Training
Experimental: Virtual Reality Exercise Training
Participants in this arm performed virtual reality-based exercise training for 8 weeks, 3 days per week. Training sessions were conducted using an Oculus 3 virtual reality headset and included structured exercise programs delivered through VR applications (e.g., FitXR, Holofit, PowerBeats VR). Each session consisted of warm-up, main exercise tasks targeting aerobic capacity, balance, reaction time, and flexibility, followed by a cool-down period. All sessions were performed under standardized laboratory conditions.
Participants in this intervention arm completed a structured virtual reality-based exercise training program for 8 weeks, with sessions conducted 3 days per week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday). Training sessions were performed using an Oculus 3 virtual reality headset and included interactive exercise modules delivered through VR applications (FitXR, Holofit, PowerBeats VR, and similar platforms). Each session consisted of standardized warm-up exercises, main training tasks targeting aerobic capacity, balance, reaction time, and flexibility, and a cool-down period. All sessions were conducted under controlled laboratory conditions with standardized environmental settings.
Other Names:
  • VR Training
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants in this arm did not receive any structured exercise intervention during the 8-week study period. They continued their normal daily activities and routine lifestyle without participation in any supervised training program. No VR-based or traditional exercise sessions were administered. Pre-test and post-test measurements were conducted in the same manner as the intervention groups.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Concentration Level Measured by EEG (NeuroSky Mobile Brainwave Sensor)
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of exercise intervention
Concentration performance will be assessed using an EEG-based NeuroSky Mobile Brainwave Sensor. Participants will be asked to focus on a fixed object for 3 minutes, and attention levels will be recorded. The outcome will be expressed as the change in concentration score from baseline to post-intervention.
After 8 weeks of exercise intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Reaction Time (Hand and Foot) Measured by Light Trainer System
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of exercise intervention
Reaction time will be measured using an 8-module light-based reaction system. The average response time (milliseconds) across trials will be calculated for both hand and foot responses. The outcome will be reported as change from baseline.
After 8 weeks of exercise intervention
Change in Balance Performance Assessed by Togu Challenge Disc
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of exercise intervention
Balance will be evaluated using a stability index scored on a 1-5 scale (1 = very good, 5 = very poor). The best performance score will be recorded and analyzed as change from baseline.
After 8 weeks of exercise intervention
Change in Flexibility Measured by Sit-and-Reach Test
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of exercise intervention
Flexibility will be assessed using a sit-and-reach bench. The maximum reach distance (cm) will be recorded. The outcome will be expressed as change from baseline.
After 8 weeks of exercise intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Halil İ Çakır, Asst. Prof. Dr., Recep Tayyip Erdogan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RTEU-VR-EX-2024-01
  • 02026004016266 (Other Grant/Funding Number: RTEU Development Foundation)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Inactivity

Clinical Trials on Traditional Exercise Training

Subscribe