LOW LOAD RESISTANCE BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING VERSUS NEUROMUSCULAR TRAINING IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

October 19, 2020 updated by: Mai Mohamed Abdelkader Abdallah
This study will be conducted to compare the effect of BFR with LLRT versus neuromuscular training on quadriceps muscle strength, knee joint function and proprioception accuracy.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

PURPOSE:

This study will be conducted to compare the effect of BFR with LLRT versus neuromuscular training on quadriceps muscle strength, knee joint function and proprioception accuracy.

BACKGROUND:

Patients with knee OA may have reduction of tolerance of the high-load programs which is recommended for eliciting strength gains (Messier et al., 2013). Thus, for reducing disease risk and enhancing physical function, there is a need for effectively strengthening the quadriceps muscle while limiting pain and adverse joint loading in people with knee OA (Segal et al., 2015). Blood flow restriction (BFR) with low-load resistance training (LLRT) is an alternative to traditional strength training that can be used in knee OA with minimal adverse joint loading that is normally found in traditional strengthening programs(Pope et al., 2013). It is attained through applying pressure externally with a pneumatic cuff or tourniquet. The applied pressure occludes venous outflow while maintaining arterial inflow with intent to promote blood pooling in the capillary beds of the limb muscles distal to the tourniquet (Slysz et al., 2016). Kubota et al., (2008), showed that BFR can be applied during periods of immobilization to decrease disuse muscle atrophy of limbs. Also it can be combined with exercise which enhances muscular development. Resistance exercise appears to provide great muscular gains when combined with BFR (Slysz et al., 2016).

HYPOTHESES:

  1. There will not be a significant difference between traditional training, BFR with LLRT and neuromuscular training on improving quadriceps muscle strength using HHD in patients with unilateral knee OA.
  2. There will not be a significant difference between traditional training, BFR with LLRT and neuromuscular training on improving knee joint function on WOMAC questionnaire in patients with unilateral knee OA.
  3. There will not be a significant difference between traditional training, BFR with LLRT and neuromuscular training on improving knee joint proprioception in patients with unilateral knee OA.

RESEARCH QUESTION:

Does blood flow restriction with low load resistance training and neuromuscular training have a significant effect over traditional rehabilitation protocol (stretching and strengthening for hip and knee muscles) on quadriceps muscle strength, knee joint function and proprioception accuracy in patients with unilateral knee OA?

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age range from 45-60 years (Segal et al., 2015).
  • Walk with painful knee OA without assistive devices (Bryk et al., 2016).
  • Mild to moderate unilateral OA grade II-III (K/L) (Bryk et al., 2016).
  • BMI < 30 kg/m² (not being classified as obese) (Bryk et al., 2016).
  • Never participated in resistance training in the 3 months prior to their appointment (Jan et al., 2008)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe knee OA (grade IV according to K/L classification).
  • Bilateral knee OA.
  • Congenital or acquired inflammatory, rheumatic or neurological (systemic or local) diseases involving the knee.
  • Repeated treatment with steroids.
  • Secondary knee OA.
  • Received joint replacement surgery in either Knee or/and hip.
  • Cardiovascular and neuromuscular disorders
  • Diabetic patients
  • Psychiatric disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: control group (Traditional therapy group)
control group (Traditional therapy group) (n=21): patients will receive traditional training exercises (high load resistance training
Neuromuscular training
Other Names:
  • Blood flow restriction training
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental group I (BFR training group)
Experimental group I (BFR training group) (n=21): patients will receive LLRT with BFR.
Neuromuscular training
Other Names:
  • Blood flow restriction training
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental group II (Neuromuscular training group)
Experimental group II (Neuromuscular training group) (n=21): patients will receive neuromuscular training exercises
Neuromuscular training
Other Names:
  • Blood flow restriction training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle strength
Time Frame: 3 months
Hand-Held Dynamometer for measuring muscle strength
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee joint function
Time Frame: 3 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index for an Arab population for assessing knee function
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

January 15, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 15, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Clinical Trials on Traditional exercise therapy

Subscribe