A COMBINATION OF RECTAL INDOMETHACIN AND COLD WATER EXPOSURE OF THE AMPULLA AFTER ERCP IS SUPERIOR TO RECTAL INDOMETHACIN ALONE IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF POST-ERCP PANCREATITIS -RCT (ERCP)

May 8, 2026 updated by: Mohan Ramchandani, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

A COMBINATION OF RECTAL INDOMETHACIN AND COLD WATER EXPOSURE OF THE AMPULLA AFTER ERCP IS SUPERIOR TO RECTAL INDOMETHACIN ALONE IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF POST ERCP PANCREATITIS

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has emerged as the primary modality in the management of biliary and pancreatic disease. The complications occurring from ERCP can range from mild to fatal. Procedure related complications are Pancreatitis , Bleeding , Infections- Cholangitis, Cholecystitis , Perforations of which Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common serious adverse event. Reported incidence of PEP is 8.6-10.7% according to studies(overall RCTs).In India it is 6.6% (2020 study). Prevention as well as early detection and management of PEP results in a satisfactory outcome. Multiple RCTs and meta-analyses show rectal indomethacin/diclofenac significantly reduce PEP in average- and high-risk patients; now recommended by ASGE/ESGE for nearly all ERCPs. Other measures for prevention of PEP are prophylactic pancreatic duct stents in high-risk anatomy/instrumentation; wire-guided cannulation; minimizing PD contrast; periprocedural aggressive lactated Ringer's hydration. Cryoprevention effect was shown to reduce postprocedure papillary edema and thus lower the risk of PEP

  1. Rectal NSAIDs reduce but do not eliminate PEP.
  2. Cold-water ampullary cooling is biologically plausible but under-studied.
  3. First study to demonstrate if combination of rectal indomethacin and cold-water irrigation may have a synergistic effect.
  4. First study in Indian population.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

• Assess whether combination therapy reduces PEP compared to NSAIDS alone.

Secondary Aims:

  • Compare PEP severity (Cotton grading and revised Atlanta criteria).
  • Adverse effects
  • Length of hospital stay and/or intensive care unit stay
  • Assess feasibility and adherence and fidelity of cooling protocol.
  • Explore effect modification by baseline PEP risk (average vs high-risk), type of intervention (diagnostic vs therapeutic ERCP), and prophylactic pancreatic stenting use

DESIGN AND DURATION OF THE STUDY: Single centre pilot randomised control superiority trail over 12 months with 30 days followup

INCLUSION / EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Inclusion criteria:

    • Standard ERCP indication
    • Consent given
  • Exclusion criteria:

    • Pregnancy and lactation
    • Chronic calcific pancreatitis / pancreatic divisum / pancreatic head malignancy / acute pancreatitis within 14 days of ERCP
    • ERCP for biliary/pancreatic stent exchange or removal or prior biliary sphincterotomy
    • Chronic kidney disease with GFR <30 or acute kidney injury.
    • Presence of rectal anomaly
    • Active GI bleeding or high bleeding risk precluding NSAIDs;platelet <50000/L;INR >1.5 not correctable
    • NSAID allergy
    • Cirrhosis Child-Pugh C
    • Temp instability or severe cardiopulmonary disease precluding cooling/shock risk.
    • Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (Type 3)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Telangana
      • Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500079
        • Recruiting
        • Asian institute of Gastroenterology/AIG Hospitals
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

150

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Standard ERCP indication
  2. Consent given

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy and lactation
  2. Chronic calcific pancreatitis / pancreatic divisum / pancreatic head
  3. malignancy / acute pancreatitis within 14 days of ERCP
  4. ERCP for biliary/pancreatic stent exchange or removal or prior biliary sphincterotomy
  5. Chronic kidney disease with GFR <30 or acute kidney injury.
  6. Presence of rectal anomaly
  7. Active GI bleeding or high bleeding risk precluding NSAIDs;platelet <50000/L;INR >1.5 not correctable
  8. NSAID allergy
  9. Cirrhosis Child-Pugh C
  10. Temp instability or severe cardiopulmonary disease precluding cooling/shock risk.
  11. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (Type 3)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Rectal Indomethacin plus Papilary spay of Cold saline
Intervention group: Rectal indomethacin( 100 mg suppository administered 30-60 minutes pre ERCP + cold saline irrigation (4 - 10°C, 250 mL, 2 min)
Rectal Indomethacin alone
Rectal indomethacin should be administered to the patient before 30 minutes ERCP procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Categorisation of Post ERCP Pancreatitis
Time Frame: 10 Days
Incidence of Post ERCP Pancreatitis by Cotton criteria: severity graded as mild/ moderate/ severe per consensus
10 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum amylase and lipase 24 hours post ERCP.
Time Frame: 24 hours
To evaluate the serum amylase and lipase levels 24 hours after ERCP procedure
24 hours
Abdomen pain score assessment
Time Frame: 24 hours
To check pain levels every 4 hours up to 24 hours post ERCP procedure
24 hours
Adverse events detection : GI bleeding, perforation, cholangitis, aspiration, hypoxemia
Time Frame: 24 hours
To detect adverse events post procedure
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohan Dr Ramchandani, MD DM, Asian Institute Of Gastroenterology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IWCRCT1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreas Disease

Subscribe