Impact of the Helfer Skin Tap Technique on Pain and Comfort Levels During Ventrogluteal Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled study evaluates the effect of the Helfer Skin Tap Technique on pain and comfort during ventrogluteal intramuscular injections in adults.

Participants aged 18-65 receiving diclofenac sodium injections at the Emergency Department of Yalova Training and Research Hospital will be randomly assigned to the intervention group (Helfer technique) or control group (standard injection). Pain and comfort will be measured using visual analog scales (VAS) before and after the injection.

The study aims to provide evidence for improving injection pain management and patient comfort. Participation is voluntary, and all procedures follow ethical guidelines.

Study Overview

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Conditions: PAIN, ANXIETY, AND COMFORT
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Helfer Skin Tap Technique applied before IM Diclofenac injection

Detailed Description

The implementation of high-risk treatments and interventions in healthcare has increasingly highlighted the concept of patient safety in recent years. Patient safety is an indicator of quality in healthcare services and has become one of the fundamental elements of providing qualified and high-quality care (Korkmaz, 2018). The growing complexity of healthcare services, changing healthcare needs, and rapid technological advancements in the field introduce multiple risks for both healthcare professionals and patients (Yıldız & Yıldız, 2020).

In the healthcare process, after medications are prescribed by the physician, nurses administer these drugs and are responsible for preparing the correct medication and delivering it to the right patient, at the right time, via the right route, in the correct dose, and for monitoring its effects (Apaydın & Öztürk, 2021). Medications can be administered via oral, topical, or parenteral routes (Turan et al., 2019). Parenteral drug administration, one of the important medication routes, involves invasive procedures and carries multiple risks (Okuroğlu et al., 2019).

Intramuscular (IM) injection, one of the parenteral routes, has been used in nursing practice for over a century and is applied by delivering the drug into deep muscle tissue (Korkmaz et al., 2018). Because muscles have a rich vascular supply, IM injections allow better absorption of the drug (Turan et al., 2019). Accordingly, the absorption and bioavailability of drugs via IM injection are higher compared to oral or other parenteral routes (Ayinde et al., 2021). IM injections require nurses to have strong knowledge in anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology, as well as good psychomotor skills (Eraydın & Karagözoğlu, 2022). Additionally, determining needle depth, syringe length, and injection speed is highly important (Turan et al., 2019).

If IM injections are not properly administered, they can cause nerve (sciatic nerve), muscle, vascular, and bone injury; abscess, erythema, scar tissue formation, hematoma, bleeding, persistent pain, cellulitis, tissue necrosis, granuloma, muscle fibrosis, contracture, and infection (Eraydın & Karagözoğlu, 2022; Tok Aydın, 2019). Nerve damage can occur directly from needle impact or indirectly due to edema or hematoma at the injection site, which exerts mechanical pressure on the nerve, or via diffusion of the drug into the nerve causing toxic effects. Antibiotics and analgesics are the most frequent causes (Bostan, 2016). The World Health Organization reports that approximately 12 billion injections are administered globally each year, with 50% given unsafely (Turan et al., 2019). Therefore, safety in IM injection administration is critically important (Turan et al., 2019).

After IM injection, pain at the injection site, anxiety, fear, dissatisfaction, or loss of privacy can reduce the acceptability of treatment for patients. Awareness that IM injections are painful may affect clinicians' preference for this route. Despite this, due to its importance in treatment, pain at the injection site remains a key concern (Ayinde et al., 2021; Eraydın & Karagözoğlu, 2022).

When individuals experience pain, how the painful stimulus is transmitted to the brain, perceived, and responded to is influenced by socio-cultural factors such as family, gender, age, anxiety, previous pain experiences, race, culture, and ethnicity (Shah & Narayanan, 2016). Injection-related fear and anxiety are commonly encountered by nurses, and supporting patients during IM injections can reduce pain and anxiety (Eraydın & Karagözoğlu, 2022).

Pain management in healthcare settings is a fundamental component of nursing care, and nurses must be competent in this area, as it is part of their professional responsibility (Shah & Narayanan, 2016). A systematic review examining pain management during IM injections found that techniques such as manual pressure, Helfer Skin Tap Technique, post-injection massage, acupressure, air-lock technique, and ice application may be potentially effective in reducing injection pain (Ayinde et al., 2021).

Nurses are expected to apply interventions based on evidence, and the ventrogluteal region is preferred for IM injection due to its safety (Tosunöz, 2023). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly used medications for pain, fever, and inflammation, with diclofenac sodium being one of the widely prescribed analgesics, used to treat inflammatory diseases, dysmenorrhea, and other conditions (Çiltaş, 2014; Bhadra et al., 2016). IM administration of 75 mg diclofenac sodium reaches peak plasma levels within approximately 20 minutes (Çiltaş, 2014).

Previous studies have used the Helfer Skin Tap Technique with various drugs and samples (Shaban et al., 2021; Güven & Çalbayram, 2023; Kurt et al., 2024). However, there is insufficient evidence on the effect of the technique on pain and comfort during IM diclofenac sodium injection. This study was therefore designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Helfer Skin Tap Technique on pain and comfort during IM diclofenac injection in the ventrogluteal region (Tosunöz, 2023).

The study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Helfer Skin Tap Technique, with the expectation that the findings will contribute to evidence-based nursing practices, reduce injection-related pain, improve patient comfort, and positively influence treatment adherence and quality of life.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Estimated): 60
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Yalova
    • Yalova, Yalova, Turkey (Türkiye), 77100
      • Yalova University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Individuals who can speak and understand Turkish,

Individuals who are willing to participate in the study and have provided written informed consent,

Aged between 18 and 65 years,

Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18-24 kg/m²,

Individuals without sensory-motor deficits, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, or neuropathy,

Individuals who have not received oral or parenteral analgesic treatment before the injection,

Individuals without ecchymosis, redness, or swelling at the injection site,

Individuals without orthopedic issues preventing internal rotation of extremities,

Individuals with intact orientation to time and place,

Individuals without visual or hearing impairments.

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals who refuse to undergo the technique applied within the study after being enrolled,

Individuals who voluntarily withdraw from the study,

Individuals for whom less than 24 hours have passed since their last injecti

-

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Experimental: Helfer Skin Tap Technique applied before IM Diclofenac injection	Behavioral: Helfer Skin Tap Technique applied before IM Diclofenac injection; Helfer Skin Tap Technique applied before IM Diclofenac injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score for Pain	Description: Patient's pain level Time Frame: From the initiation of the intramuscular injection until the completion of the procedure	Immediately (0 minute) and 5 minutes after the intramuscular injection.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Comfort Levels Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Immediately and 5 Minutes After Ventrogluteal Intramuscular Injection	Description: Patient Comfort Level Description: patient's comfort level	Time Frame: Immediately (0 minute) and 5 minutes after the intramuscular injection.

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Seyda Can
• Collaborators: Yalova training and research hospital

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): January 20, 2026
• Primary Completion (Estimated): January 1, 2028
• Study Completion (Estimated): January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 21, 2026
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 6, 2026
• First Posted (Actual): May 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 13, 2026
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 6, 2026
• Last Verified: January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Pain, Comfort,İntramusculer injection,patience,nurse,helfer skin tape
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neurologic Manifestations; Mental Disorders; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms; Signs and Symptoms; Pain; Anxiety Disorders
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2025/387; E-51301208-605-298988011 (Other Identifier: Republic of Türkiye, Yalova Provincial Directorate of Health)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: UNDECIDED
• IPD Plan Description: The study process may vary depending on the workload.

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No