Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Impact of the Helfer Skin Tap Technique on Pain and Comfort Levels During Ventrogluteal Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

6 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Seyda Can

This randomized controlled study evaluates the effect of the Helfer Skin Tap Technique on pain and comfort during ventrogluteal intramuscular injections in adults.

Participants aged 18-65 receiving diclofenac sodium injections at the Emergency Department of Yalova Training and Research Hospital will be randomly assigned to the intervention group (Helfer technique) or control group (standard injection). Pain and comfort will be measured using visual analog scales (VAS) before and after the injection.

The study aims to provide evidence for improving injection pain management and patient comfort. Participation is voluntary, and all procedures follow ethical guidelines.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Activo, no reclutando

Descripción detallada

The implementation of high-risk treatments and interventions in healthcare has increasingly highlighted the concept of patient safety in recent years. Patient safety is an indicator of quality in healthcare services and has become one of the fundamental elements of providing qualified and high-quality care (Korkmaz, 2018). The growing complexity of healthcare services, changing healthcare needs, and rapid technological advancements in the field introduce multiple risks for both healthcare professionals and patients (Yıldız & Yıldız, 2020).

In the healthcare process, after medications are prescribed by the physician, nurses administer these drugs and are responsible for preparing the correct medication and delivering it to the right patient, at the right time, via the right route, in the correct dose, and for monitoring its effects (Apaydın & Öztürk, 2021). Medications can be administered via oral, topical, or parenteral routes (Turan et al., 2019). Parenteral drug administration, one of the important medication routes, involves invasive procedures and carries multiple risks (Okuroğlu et al., 2019).

Intramuscular (IM) injection, one of the parenteral routes, has been used in nursing practice for over a century and is applied by delivering the drug into deep muscle tissue (Korkmaz et al., 2018). Because muscles have a rich vascular supply, IM injections allow better absorption of the drug (Turan et al., 2019). Accordingly, the absorption and bioavailability of drugs via IM injection are higher compared to oral or other parenteral routes (Ayinde et al., 2021). IM injections require nurses to have strong knowledge in anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology, as well as good psychomotor skills (Eraydın & Karagözoğlu, 2022). Additionally, determining needle depth, syringe length, and injection speed is highly important (Turan et al., 2019).

If IM injections are not properly administered, they can cause nerve (sciatic nerve), muscle, vascular, and bone injury; abscess, erythema, scar tissue formation, hematoma, bleeding, persistent pain, cellulitis, tissue necrosis, granuloma, muscle fibrosis, contracture, and infection (Eraydın & Karagözoğlu, 2022; Tok Aydın, 2019). Nerve damage can occur directly from needle impact or indirectly due to edema or hematoma at the injection site, which exerts mechanical pressure on the nerve, or via diffusion of the drug into the nerve causing toxic effects. Antibiotics and analgesics are the most frequent causes (Bostan, 2016). The World Health Organization reports that approximately 12 billion injections are administered globally each year, with 50% given unsafely (Turan et al., 2019). Therefore, safety in IM injection administration is critically important (Turan et al., 2019).

After IM injection, pain at the injection site, anxiety, fear, dissatisfaction, or loss of privacy can reduce the acceptability of treatment for patients. Awareness that IM injections are painful may affect clinicians' preference for this route. Despite this, due to its importance in treatment, pain at the injection site remains a key concern (Ayinde et al., 2021; Eraydın & Karagözoğlu, 2022).

When individuals experience pain, how the painful stimulus is transmitted to the brain, perceived, and responded to is influenced by socio-cultural factors such as family, gender, age, anxiety, previous pain experiences, race, culture, and ethnicity (Shah & Narayanan, 2016). Injection-related fear and anxiety are commonly encountered by nurses, and supporting patients during IM injections can reduce pain and anxiety (Eraydın & Karagözoğlu, 2022).

Pain management in healthcare settings is a fundamental component of nursing care, and nurses must be competent in this area, as it is part of their professional responsibility (Shah & Narayanan, 2016). A systematic review examining pain management during IM injections found that techniques such as manual pressure, Helfer Skin Tap Technique, post-injection massage, acupressure, air-lock technique, and ice application may be potentially effective in reducing injection pain (Ayinde et al., 2021).

Nurses are expected to apply interventions based on evidence, and the ventrogluteal region is preferred for IM injection due to its safety (Tosunöz, 2023). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most commonly used medications for pain, fever, and inflammation, with diclofenac sodium being one of the widely prescribed analgesics, used to treat inflammatory diseases, dysmenorrhea, and other conditions (Çiltaş, 2014; Bhadra et al., 2016). IM administration of 75 mg diclofenac sodium reaches peak plasma levels within approximately 20 minutes (Çiltaş, 2014).

Previous studies have used the Helfer Skin Tap Technique with various drugs and samples (Shaban et al., 2021; Güven & Çalbayram, 2023; Kurt et al., 2024). However, there is insufficient evidence on the effect of the technique on pain and comfort during IM diclofenac sodium injection. This study was therefore designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Helfer Skin Tap Technique on pain and comfort during IM diclofenac injection in the ventrogluteal region (Tosunöz, 2023).

The study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Helfer Skin Tap Technique, with the expectation that the findings will contribute to evidence-based nursing practices, reduce injection-related pain, improve patient comfort, and positively influence treatment adherence and quality of life.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

60

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

Individuals who can speak and understand Turkish,

Individuals who are willing to participate in the study and have provided written informed consent,

Aged between 18 and 65 years,

Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18-24 kg/m²,

Individuals without sensory-motor deficits, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, or neuropathy,

Individuals who have not received oral or parenteral analgesic treatment before the injection,

Individuals without ecchymosis, redness, or swelling at the injection site,

Individuals without orthopedic issues preventing internal rotation of extremities,

Individuals with intact orientation to time and place,

Individuals without visual or hearing impairments.

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals who refuse to undergo the technique applied within the study after being enrolled,

Individuals who voluntarily withdraw from the study,

Individuals for whom less than 24 hours have passed since their last injecti

-

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Cuidados de apoyo
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Sin intervención: Grupo de control
Experimental: Helfer Skin Tap Technique applied before IM Diclofenac injection
Helfer Skin Tap Technique applied before IM Diclofenac injection

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score for Pain
Periodo de tiempo: Immediately (0 minute) and 5 minutes after the intramuscular injection.
Description: Patient's pain level Time Frame: From the initiation of the intramuscular injection until the completion of the procedure
Immediately (0 minute) and 5 minutes after the intramuscular injection.

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Comfort Levels Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Immediately and 5 Minutes After Ventrogluteal Intramuscular Injection
Periodo de tiempo: Time Frame: Immediately (0 minute) and 5 minutes after the intramuscular injection.

Description:

Patient Comfort Level Description: patient's comfort level

Time Frame: Immediately (0 minute) and 5 minutes after the intramuscular injection.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

20 de enero de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de enero de 2028

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de enero de 2028

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

21 de enero de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

6 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

13 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

13 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

6 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de enero de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 2025/387
  • E-51301208-605-298988011 (Otro identificador: Republic of Türkiye, Yalova Provincial Directorate of Health)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Descripción del plan IPD

The study process may vary depending on the workload.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir