Comparison of the Italian and U.S. Forensic Models for Dual-diagnosis Offenders: a 3-year Longitudinal Study

May 6, 2026 updated by: Felice Carabellese, University of Bari

Comparison of the Italian and US Forensic Models Regarding Dual Diagnosis Offenders: a 3-year Longitudinal Study

This study aims to compare the Italian and U.S. forensic models in the treatment of offenders with dual diagnosis through a three-year longitudinal design. In Italy, the closure of Judicial Psychiatric Hospitals following Law 81/2014 led to the establishment of a community-based forensic system centered on REMS (Residences for the Execution of Security Measures), integrated within the National Health Service. This model seeks to limit institutionalization and promote rehabilitative pathways in community settings. However, it continues to face challenges related to limited bed availability, waiting lists, and the complex management of social dangerousness. In contrast, the U.S. system, particularly in California, is characterized by high-security forensic psychiatric hospitals with large capacities, but also presents issues such as prolonged hospitalizations, an aging patient population, and a high prevalence of substance use disorders.

Dual diagnosis, defined as the co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders, is highly prevalent in forensic populations and is associated with increased clinical complexity, higher risk of recidivism, and poorer treatment outcomes. Neurobiological and psychological mechanisms underlying addiction-including dysfunctions in the dopaminergic reward system, craving processes, and impairments in executive functioning-contribute to reduced behavioral control and increased impulsivity. Theoretical models such as the self-medication hypothesis and multifactorial frameworks suggest that substance use may both exacerbate psychiatric symptoms and represent an attempt to regulate them.

Given these complexities, integrated treatment approaches that combine psychiatric care and addiction interventions are essential, particularly in forensic settings. The present study includes offenders with mental illness in forensic care systems in Italy and California, encompassing both custodial and non-custodial settings. Participants will be followed over a three-year period, with assessments conducted at 12, 24, and 36 months. The methodology involves the use of standardized instruments to evaluate psychopathological severity, global functioning, risk of violent recidivism, protective factors, treatment adherence, impulsivity, and substance use. Data on clinical outcomes, antisocial behaviors, and discharge conditions will also be collected.

The primary objectives of the study are to describe and compare the clinical, demographic, and criminological profiles of forensic populations with dual diagnosis; to examine treatment pathways and outcomes; to identify indicators of treatment effectiveness; and to evaluate both risk and protective prognostic factors, as well as their predictive value for recidivism and clinical trajectories.

The expected impact of the study lies in improving the understanding of differences between community-based and hospital-based forensic models, with the goal of identifying integrated strategies capable of enhancing rehabilitation, reducing recidivism, and improving long-term outcomes. Findings may contribute to the development of more effective and individualized treatment approaches, as well as inform health and judicial policies aimed at better integrating clinical care and risk management in dual diagnosis forensic populations.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of adult offenders with mental disorders recruited from forensic psychiatric care systems in Italy and California. Participants are enrolled at the time of the application of a security measure or upon admission to a forensic facility, including both custodial and non-custodial settings.

In the Italian cohort, participants include individuals placed under security measures within the National Health Service, such as those admitted to REMS or managed in community-based forensic or psychiatric services. This group reflects the community-oriented Italian forensic model, characterized by rehabilitative pathways and integration with territorial mental health services.

In the California cohort, participants are recruited from high-security forensic hospitals and community forensic programs under the Department of State Hospitals, including individuals deemed incompetent to stand trial (IST) or not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI). This population reflects a h

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Individuals admitted to forensic psychiatric care in Italy or California.
  • Presence of a diagnosed mental disorder according to DSM-5 / ICD criteria.
  • Presence of a current or lifetime Substance Use Disorder, consistent with a dual-diagnosis condition.
  • Placement in one of the study settings:

Italy: REMS or other forensic/community facilities under custodial or non-custodial security measures; California: Department of State Hospitals forensic facilities.

  • Ability to provide written informed consent, or consent provided through a legal guardian when applicable.
  • Availability for longitudinal follow-up at 12, 24, and 36 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of a confirmed psychiatric disorder.
  • Absence of current or lifetime Substance Use Disorder.
  • Non-forensic psychiatric patients without criminal justice involvement.
  • Severe cognitive impairment or neurological condition preventing valid assessment.
  • Acute medical or psychiatric instability that makes participation temporarily impossible.
  • Inability to complete the assessment procedures, even with support or adapted administration.
  • Refusal to participate or withdrawal of informed consent. Insufficient clinical, forensic, or follow-up data for longitudinal analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Violent Recidivism Risk
Time Frame: from enrollment at 3 years
The risk of violent recidivism will be assessed longitudinally using structured professional judgment approaches, integrating dynamic clinical, historical, and risk management factors. Changes over time will be analyzed to evaluate the impact of treatment and system-related variables on future violence risk.
from enrollment at 3 years
Clinical Improvement (Psychopathology)
Time Frame: from enrollment to 3 years
Clinical severity will be measured through standardized psychiatric rating scales, capturing changes in psychopathological symptoms across the follow-up period. This outcome reflects the effectiveness of treatment in reducing symptom burden and improving mental stability.
from enrollment to 3 years
Substance Use Severity and Relapse
Time Frame: from enrollment to 3 years
Substance use severity and relapse will be evaluated using validated screening tools and clinical data, focusing on patterns of use, reduction, and recurrence over time. This outcome is central to understanding the trajectory of dual diagnosis and its interaction with clinical and forensic outcomes.
from enrollment to 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Felice F. Carabellese, Medical doctor, Full Professor, University of Bari Aldo Moro

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • prot. 2237/CEL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Abuse

Subscribe