- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02955199
Stage III Community-based Efficacy Trial for Mothering From the Inside Out
July 12, 2021 updated by: Yale University
Fostering Mothers' Emotionally-Responsive Parenting: A Stage III Community-Based Efficacy Trial
This is a Stage III community-based randomized clinical efficacy trial testing Mothering from the Inside Out (MIO), the first evidence-based parenting intervention designed to be delivered by addiction counselors in addiction treatment settings where parents of young children are enrolled in treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a new Stage III community-based randomized clinical efficacy trial testing Mothering from the Inside Out (MIO), the first evidence-based parenting intervention designed to be delivered by addiction counselors in addiction treatment settings where parents of young children are enrolled in treatment.
MIO is a weekly individual parenting therapy developed as an enhancement to standard addiction treatment that targets the addicted mother's capacity to recognize and regulate her own emotional distress during stressful parenting situations so that she can support her child's developing capacity for emotional and behavioral regulation.
This capacity, called reflective functioning (RF), is a psychological skill that promotes abstinence and also helps parents foster their young children's secure attachment.
Now that MIO has demonstrated efficacy in two randomized efficacy trials, the next step will be to conduct a new Stage III community-based efficacy trial where addiction counselors are trained to deliver MIO and PE with fidelity in an addiction treatment setting and to evaluate treatment outcomes and mechanisms of change in this community setting.
At the end of this trial, if MIO demonstrates efficacy, all the necessary materials will be ready to train addiction counselors across a broad range of treatment settings in a Stage IV effectiveness trial.
120 mothers in addiction treatment and caring for children ages 11 - 60 months will be randomized to 12 sessions of MIO vs PE with a trained addiction counselor and fidelity will be monitored and maintained for treatment duration.
It is expected that MIO-assigned mothers will demonstrate greater improvement in the primary targeted outcome - reflective functioning at week 12 (end of treatment) and week 33 (end of follow up).
It is also predicted that MIO-assigned mothers will demonstrate greater improvement in secondary outcomes, including maternal sensitivity, caregiving behavior, psychiatric distress, depression and substance use at week 12 (end of treatment) and week 33 (end of follow up).
Finally, it is predicted that children of MIO-assigned mothers will demonstrate greater improvement in the secondary outcome - attachment security - at week 12 (end of treatment) and week 33 (end of follow up).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
97
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
- The Moms 'n' Kids Program at the APT Foundation
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 60 years (ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- English-speaking female adults (18-65 years of age)
- Receiving outpatient substance abuse treatment services at the APT Foundation
- Caring for at least one child between 11 and 60 months of age
- Express interest in receiving assistance with parenting
Exclusion Criteria:
- Actively suicidal, homicidal, or severe cognitive impairment
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mothering From the Inside Out
Mothering from the Inside Out (MIO) is a 12 session individual parenting therapy designed for mothers enrolled in treatment for drug and/or alcohol addiction and caring for a child between 11 and 60 months of age.
MIO aims to promote their capacity for parental reflective functioning (the capacity to recognize and make sense of their own and their child's difficult emotions during challenging parenting situations).
|
Mothering from the Inside Out (MIO) is a 12 session individual parenting therapy designed for mothers enrolled in treatment for drug and/or alcohol addiction and caring for a child between 11 and 60 months of age.
MIO aims to promote their capacity for parental reflective functioning (the capacity to recognize and make sense of their own and their child's difficult emotions during challenging parenting situations).
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Parent Education
Parent Education (PE) is a 12 session individual parent counseling intervention designed for mothers enrolled in treatment for drug and/or alcohol addiction and caring for a child between 11 and 60 months of age.
PE provides psycho-education about child development and parenting strategies typically available at community agencies on parenting.
PE is designed to control for active treatment, treatment dose, and individualized intervention approach.
|
Parent Education (PE) is a 12 session individual parent counseling intervention designed for mothers enrolled in treatment for drug and/or alcohol addiction and caring for a child between 11 and 60 months of age.
PE provides psycho-education about child development and parenting strategies typically available at community agencies on parenting.
PE is designed to control for active treatment, treatment dose, and individualized intervention approach.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maternal Reflective Functioning coded using the Parent Development Interview
Time Frame: Change from baseline in reflective functioning at 12 weeks
|
A one hour semi-structured interview that asks mothers to describe episodes with their child that typically require the capacity for reflective functioning.
The interview is coded by a rater blind to all information about the mother and her treatment assignment.
The protocol is assigned a score on a scale from -1 to 9 where higher scores indicate a better capacity for reflective functioning.
A score of 5 indicates average reflective functioning and a score of 3 and lower represents absence of the capacity.
|
Change from baseline in reflective functioning at 12 weeks
|
|
Maternal Reflective Functioning coded using the Parent Development Interview
Time Frame: Change from baseline in reflective functioning at 33 weeks
|
A one hour semi-structured interview that asks mothers to describe episodes with their child that typically require the capacity for reflective functioning.
The interview is coded by a rater blind to all information about the mother and her treatment assignment.
The protocol is assigned a score on a scale from -1 to 9 where higher scores indicate a better capacity for reflective functioning.
A score of 5 indicates average reflective functioning and a score of 3 and lower represents absence of the capacity.
|
Change from baseline in reflective functioning at 33 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maternal Sensitivity coded with Ruth Feldman's Coding Interactive Behavior (CIB) Scales
Time Frame: Change from baseline in maternal sensitivity at 12 weeks
|
Maternal behavior is observed during a 5 minute interaction with the target child during which they explore a set of novel toys together.
Maternal Sensitivity Scale includes 12 items that are rated on a 5 point scale by a trained coder who is blind to treatment assignment and all other information about the mother-child dyad.
The score range is 1 to 5 where a score of 2 and below indicates clinically significant problems and a score of 3 and higher is considered average to above average sensitivity.
|
Change from baseline in maternal sensitivity at 12 weeks
|
|
Maternal Sensitivity coded with Ruth Feldman's Coding Interactive Behavior (CIB) Scales
Time Frame: Change from baseline in maternal sensitivity at 33 weeks
|
Maternal behavior is observed during a 5 minute interaction with the target child during which they explore a set of novel toys together.
Maternal Sensitivity Scale includes 12 items that are rated on a 5 point scale by a trained coder who is blind to treatment assignment and all other information about the mother-child dyad.
The score range is 1 to 5 where a score of 2 and below indicates clinically significant problems and a score of 3 and higher is considered average to above average sensitivity.
|
Change from baseline in maternal sensitivity at 33 weeks
|
|
Maternal Caregiving Behavior coded with the Nursing Child Assessment Satellite Training (NCAST) Teaching Scales
Time Frame: Change from baseline in maternal caregiving behavior at 12 weeks
|
Maternal behavior is observed during a 5 minute interaction with the target child during which they explore a set of novel toys together.
Maternal Sensitivity Scale includes 12 items that are rated on a 5 point scale by a trained coder who is blind to treatment assignment and all other information about the mother-child dyad.
The score range is 1 to 5 where a score of 2 and below indicates clinically significant problems and a score of 3 and higher is considered average to above average sensitivity.
|
Change from baseline in maternal caregiving behavior at 12 weeks
|
|
Maternal Caregiving Behavior coded with the Nursing Child Assessment Satellite Training (NCAST) Teaching Scales
Time Frame: Change from baseline in maternal caregiving behavior at 33 weeks
|
Maternal behavior is observed during a 5 minute interaction with the target child during which they explore a set of novel toys together.
Maternal Sensitivity Scale includes 12 items that are rated on a 5 point scale by a trained coder who is blind to treatment assignment and all other information about the mother-child dyad.
The score range is 1 to 5 where a score of 2 and below indicates clinically significant problems and a score of 3 and higher is considered average to above average sensitivity.
|
Change from baseline in maternal caregiving behavior at 33 weeks
|
|
Child Attachment coded during the Strange Situation Paradigm (SSP)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in child attachment status at 12 weeks
|
The SSP is an experimental paradigm designed to activate attachment-based stress in the child during a series of separations and reunions with mother.
The assessment takes approximately 30 minutes to complete and is rated by a trained coder who is blind to treatment assignment and all other information about the mother-child dyad (except information about known disabilities in the child).
The child receives a classification of Secure, Insecure-Avoidant, Insecure-Resistant or Disorganized.
The ideal classification is Secure and the most clinically significant classification is Disorganized.
|
Change from baseline in child attachment status at 12 weeks
|
|
Child Attachment coded during the Strange Situation Paradigm (SSP)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in child attachment status at 33 weeks
|
The SSP is an experimental paradigm designed to activate attachment-based stress in the child during a series of separations and reunions with mother.
The assessment takes approximately 30 minutes to complete and is rated by a trained coder who is blind to treatment assignment and all other information about the mother-child dyad (except information about known disabilities in the child).
The child receives a classification of Secure, Insecure-Avoidant, Insecure-Resistant or Disorganized.
The ideal classification is Secure and the most clinically significant classification is Disorganized.
|
Change from baseline in child attachment status at 33 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Addiction and Child Welfare Questionnaire (ACWQ)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in risk for relapse at 12 weeks
|
The Addiction and Child Welfare Questionnaire is a 12 item scale that we developed to assess maternal risk for relapse.
Nine items ask about recent substance use and cravings and 3 items ask about child custody status (a potential trigger for relapse).
Items are rated on a binary scale and scores can range from 0 to 24 with higher scores representing higher risk for/incidence of relapse.
There is no established clinical cut off for the scale.
|
Change from baseline in risk for relapse at 12 weeks
|
|
Addiction and Child Welfare Questionnaire (ACWQ)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in risk for relapse at 33 weeks
|
The Addiction and Child Welfare Questionnaire is a 12 item scale that we developed to assess maternal risk for relapse.
Nine items ask about recent substance use and cravings and 3 items ask about child custody status (a potential trigger for relapse).
Items are rated on a binary scale and scores can range from 0 to 24 with higher scores representing higher risk for/incidence of relapse.
There is no established clinical cut off for the scale.
|
Change from baseline in risk for relapse at 33 weeks
|
|
Brief Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: Change from baseline in psychiatric symptoms at 12 weeks
|
The Brief Symptom Inventory is a well known 53-item self-report measure rated on a 4 point scale that assesses current psychiatric symptoms.
Scores can range from 0 to 212.
We use the T Score conversion of the Global Severity Index Composite scale to evaluate fluctuations in maternal psychiatric distress across the study.
T Scores can range from 1 to 100 where a score of 60 and above indicates clinically significant psychiatric distress.
|
Change from baseline in psychiatric symptoms at 12 weeks
|
|
Brief Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: Change from baseline in psychiatric symptoms at 33 weeks
|
The Brief Symptom Inventory is a well known 53-item self-report measure rated on a 4 point scale that assesses current psychiatric symptoms.
Scores can range from 0 to 212.
We use the T Score conversion of the Global Severity Index Composite scale to evaluate fluctuations in maternal psychiatric distress across the study.
T Scores can range from 1 to 100 where a score of 60 and above indicates clinically significant psychiatric distress.
|
Change from baseline in psychiatric symptoms at 33 weeks
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: Change from baseline in depression symptoms at 12 weeks
|
The Beck Depression Inventory is a well known 21 item self-report measure that assesses current depressive symptoms on a 3 point Likert Scale.
We use the Total Depression Score to evaluate fluctuations in maternal depression.
Scores range from 0 to 63 where a score of 29 or greater indicates clinically significant depression.
|
Change from baseline in depression symptoms at 12 weeks
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: Change from baseline in depression symptoms at 33 weeks
|
The Beck Depression Inventory is a well known 21 item self-report measure that assesses current depressive symptoms on a 3 point Likert Scale.
We use the Total Depression Score to evaluate fluctuations in maternal depression.
Scores range from 0 to 63 where a score of 29 or greater indicates clinically significant depression.
|
Change from baseline in depression symptoms at 33 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 1, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
November 4, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 14, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 12, 2021
Last Verified
July 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0407026890
- 3R01DA017294 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Child Abuse
-
Oral Health Centre of Expertise in Western NorwayEducational storytelling forlag og filmCompletedChild Abuse | Oral Health | Child Neglect | Child Maltreatment | Child Sexual Abuse | Dental NeglectNorway
-
University of WashingtonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Completed
-
Oral Health Centre of Expertise in Western NorwayOral Health Center of Expertise Rogaland, Norway; Childrens advocacy center... and other collaboratorsRecruitingChild Abuse | Child Neglect | Child MaltreatmentNorway
-
Yeditepe UniversityRecruitingEducational Program's Impact on Nursing Students' Knowledge and Awareness of Child Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse | Child NeglectTurkey
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedChild Abuse | Child MaltreatmentSweden
-
University of WashingtonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedChild Abuse | Child NeglectUnited States
-
University of PittsburghPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Northwell Health; University of...CompletedChild Abuse | Trauma | Child Maltreatment | Physical AbuseUnited States
-
Buzzi Children's HospitalNot yet recruitingChild Abuse | Child Neglect | Child Maltreatment
-
McGill UniversitySave the Children; European Network of Foundations Children and Violence Evaluation... and other collaboratorsUnknown
-
University of ChicagoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; Oak Foundation; UBS Optimus Foundation; Women... and other collaboratorsCompletedChild Abuse | Child MaltreatmentBurkina Faso
Clinical Trials on Mothering From the Inside Out (MIO)
-
Baystate Medical CenterBehavioral Health Network; Spectrum Health SystemsRecruiting
-
Baystate Medical CenterCompletedParenting | Substance Use Disorders | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de LiegeNot yet recruitingDiabetes Mellitus Self Management EducationBelgium
-
Universidad del Valle, ColombiaUniversidad de la SabanaCompletedMental Health Wellness 1Colombia
-
PfizerCompleted
-
Johane AllardOntario HIV Treatment NetworkTerminatedHIV Infections | Fatty LiverCanada